Cargando…

Comparative analysis of the visual performance after implantation of the toric implantable collamer lens in stable keratoconus: a 4-year follow-up after sequential procedure (CXL+TICL implantation)

AIMS: To report on 4-year postoperative visual performance with the toric implantable collamer lens (TICL) for stable keratoconus after sequential procedure (corneal collagen crosslinking plus TICL implantation). METHODS: Forty eyes of 24 patients with stable keratoconus with myopia between 0.00 and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Doroodgar, Farideh, Niazi, Feazollah, Sanginabadi, Azad, Niazi, Sana, Baradaran-Rafii, Alireza, Alinia, Cyrus, Azargashb, Eznollah, Ghoreishi, Mohammad
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5721648/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29354720
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjophth-2017-000090
_version_ 1783284851996098560
author Doroodgar, Farideh
Niazi, Feazollah
Sanginabadi, Azad
Niazi, Sana
Baradaran-Rafii, Alireza
Alinia, Cyrus
Azargashb, Eznollah
Ghoreishi, Mohammad
author_facet Doroodgar, Farideh
Niazi, Feazollah
Sanginabadi, Azad
Niazi, Sana
Baradaran-Rafii, Alireza
Alinia, Cyrus
Azargashb, Eznollah
Ghoreishi, Mohammad
author_sort Doroodgar, Farideh
collection PubMed
description AIMS: To report on 4-year postoperative visual performance with the toric implantable collamer lens (TICL) for stable keratoconus after sequential procedure (corneal collagen crosslinking plus TICL implantation). METHODS: Forty eyes of 24 patients with stable keratoconus with myopia between 0.00 and −18.00 dioptres (D) and astigmatism between 1.25 and 8.00 D were evaluated in this prospective interventional study (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02833649). We evaluated refraction, visual outcomes, astigmatic changes analysed by Alpins vector, contrast sensitivity, aberrometry, modulation transfer functions (MTFs), defocus curve, and operative and postoperative complications. RESULTS: At 4-year follow-up, 45% had 20/20 vision or better and 100% had 20/40 or better uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA). Vector analysis of refractive astigmatism shows that the surgically induced astigmatism (SIA) (3.20±1.46 D) was not significantly different from the target induced astigmatism (TIA) (3.14±1.42 D) (p=0.620). At 4 years postoperatively, none of the eyes showed a decrease in UCVA, in contrast to 24 eyes in which UCVA was increased by ≥1 lines, with contrast sensitivity and improvement in total aberrations and MTF value at 5 per degree (*p=0.004) after TICL implantation. The cumulative 4-year corneal endothelial cell loss was ≤5%. No patients reported dissatisfaction. At the end of follow-up, the vault was 658±54.33m (range, 500–711) and the intraocular pressure was 11.7±2.08 mm Hg. Occurrences of glare and night-driving troubles diminished after TICL surgery. CONCLUSION: The results from this standardised clinical investigation support TICL implantation from clinical and optical viewpoints in patients with stable keratoconus. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02833649, Pre-results
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5721648
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57216482018-01-19 Comparative analysis of the visual performance after implantation of the toric implantable collamer lens in stable keratoconus: a 4-year follow-up after sequential procedure (CXL+TICL implantation) Doroodgar, Farideh Niazi, Feazollah Sanginabadi, Azad Niazi, Sana Baradaran-Rafii, Alireza Alinia, Cyrus Azargashb, Eznollah Ghoreishi, Mohammad BMJ Open Ophthalmol Original Article AIMS: To report on 4-year postoperative visual performance with the toric implantable collamer lens (TICL) for stable keratoconus after sequential procedure (corneal collagen crosslinking plus TICL implantation). METHODS: Forty eyes of 24 patients with stable keratoconus with myopia between 0.00 and −18.00 dioptres (D) and astigmatism between 1.25 and 8.00 D were evaluated in this prospective interventional study (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02833649). We evaluated refraction, visual outcomes, astigmatic changes analysed by Alpins vector, contrast sensitivity, aberrometry, modulation transfer functions (MTFs), defocus curve, and operative and postoperative complications. RESULTS: At 4-year follow-up, 45% had 20/20 vision or better and 100% had 20/40 or better uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA). Vector analysis of refractive astigmatism shows that the surgically induced astigmatism (SIA) (3.20±1.46 D) was not significantly different from the target induced astigmatism (TIA) (3.14±1.42 D) (p=0.620). At 4 years postoperatively, none of the eyes showed a decrease in UCVA, in contrast to 24 eyes in which UCVA was increased by ≥1 lines, with contrast sensitivity and improvement in total aberrations and MTF value at 5 per degree (*p=0.004) after TICL implantation. The cumulative 4-year corneal endothelial cell loss was ≤5%. No patients reported dissatisfaction. At the end of follow-up, the vault was 658±54.33m (range, 500–711) and the intraocular pressure was 11.7±2.08 mm Hg. Occurrences of glare and night-driving troubles diminished after TICL surgery. CONCLUSION: The results from this standardised clinical investigation support TICL implantation from clinical and optical viewpoints in patients with stable keratoconus. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02833649, Pre-results BMJ Publishing Group 2017-09-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5721648/ /pubmed/29354720 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjophth-2017-000090 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2016. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Original Article
Doroodgar, Farideh
Niazi, Feazollah
Sanginabadi, Azad
Niazi, Sana
Baradaran-Rafii, Alireza
Alinia, Cyrus
Azargashb, Eznollah
Ghoreishi, Mohammad
Comparative analysis of the visual performance after implantation of the toric implantable collamer lens in stable keratoconus: a 4-year follow-up after sequential procedure (CXL+TICL implantation)
title Comparative analysis of the visual performance after implantation of the toric implantable collamer lens in stable keratoconus: a 4-year follow-up after sequential procedure (CXL+TICL implantation)
title_full Comparative analysis of the visual performance after implantation of the toric implantable collamer lens in stable keratoconus: a 4-year follow-up after sequential procedure (CXL+TICL implantation)
title_fullStr Comparative analysis of the visual performance after implantation of the toric implantable collamer lens in stable keratoconus: a 4-year follow-up after sequential procedure (CXL+TICL implantation)
title_full_unstemmed Comparative analysis of the visual performance after implantation of the toric implantable collamer lens in stable keratoconus: a 4-year follow-up after sequential procedure (CXL+TICL implantation)
title_short Comparative analysis of the visual performance after implantation of the toric implantable collamer lens in stable keratoconus: a 4-year follow-up after sequential procedure (CXL+TICL implantation)
title_sort comparative analysis of the visual performance after implantation of the toric implantable collamer lens in stable keratoconus: a 4-year follow-up after sequential procedure (cxl+ticl implantation)
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5721648/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29354720
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjophth-2017-000090
work_keys_str_mv AT doroodgarfarideh comparativeanalysisofthevisualperformanceafterimplantationofthetoricimplantablecollamerlensinstablekeratoconusa4yearfollowupaftersequentialprocedurecxlticlimplantation
AT niazifeazollah comparativeanalysisofthevisualperformanceafterimplantationofthetoricimplantablecollamerlensinstablekeratoconusa4yearfollowupaftersequentialprocedurecxlticlimplantation
AT sanginabadiazad comparativeanalysisofthevisualperformanceafterimplantationofthetoricimplantablecollamerlensinstablekeratoconusa4yearfollowupaftersequentialprocedurecxlticlimplantation
AT niazisana comparativeanalysisofthevisualperformanceafterimplantationofthetoricimplantablecollamerlensinstablekeratoconusa4yearfollowupaftersequentialprocedurecxlticlimplantation
AT baradaranrafiialireza comparativeanalysisofthevisualperformanceafterimplantationofthetoricimplantablecollamerlensinstablekeratoconusa4yearfollowupaftersequentialprocedurecxlticlimplantation
AT aliniacyrus comparativeanalysisofthevisualperformanceafterimplantationofthetoricimplantablecollamerlensinstablekeratoconusa4yearfollowupaftersequentialprocedurecxlticlimplantation
AT azargashbeznollah comparativeanalysisofthevisualperformanceafterimplantationofthetoricimplantablecollamerlensinstablekeratoconusa4yearfollowupaftersequentialprocedurecxlticlimplantation
AT ghoreishimohammad comparativeanalysisofthevisualperformanceafterimplantationofthetoricimplantablecollamerlensinstablekeratoconusa4yearfollowupaftersequentialprocedurecxlticlimplantation