Cargando…

Reducing oral contamination during corneal scrapes

AIMS: To identify potential contaminants of the corneal sampling procedure and examine the effect of wearing surgical face masks on the rate of contamination. METHODS: Ten surgeons recited out loud a 30 s standardised script for corneal scraping with blood agar plates positioned 30 cm away from them...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Samarawickrama, Chameen, Li, Yi-Chiao, Carnt, Nicole, Willcox, Mark, Dutta, Debarun, Watson, Stephanie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Open Ophthalmology 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5721650/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29354701
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjophth-2016-000044
_version_ 1783284852478443520
author Samarawickrama, Chameen
Li, Yi-Chiao
Carnt, Nicole
Willcox, Mark
Dutta, Debarun
Watson, Stephanie
author_facet Samarawickrama, Chameen
Li, Yi-Chiao
Carnt, Nicole
Willcox, Mark
Dutta, Debarun
Watson, Stephanie
author_sort Samarawickrama, Chameen
collection PubMed
description AIMS: To identify potential contaminants of the corneal sampling procedure and examine the effect of wearing surgical face masks on the rate of contamination. METHODS: Ten surgeons recited out loud a 30 s standardised script for corneal scraping with blood agar plates positioned 30 cm away from them. Three groups were identified: in group 1 a surgical mask was worn; group 2 had no mask worn; and group 3 had no mask but used agar plates pretreated with 5% povidone-iodine as a negative control. Each surgeon repeated the process 10 times for all groups, totalling 30 plates per surgeon and 300 plates for the experiment. All plates were masked and incubated aerobically at 37°C for 24 hours, and the number of colony forming units (CFUs) was determined. RESULTS: At 24 hours, group 1 had a mean of 0.3 CFUs per surgeon; group 2 had 6.4 CFUs per surgeon and group 3 had 0.1 CFUs per surgeon. The difference between group 1 and group 2 was significant (p<0.001) whereas the difference between group 1 and group 3 was non-significant (p=0.4). Use of face masks decreased the number of plates with CFUs by 93% (from 29 to 2 plates) and decreased the total number of CFUs by 95% (from 63 to 3 CFUs). The most common microbiota identified was Streptococcus species. CONCLUSIONS: Oral bacterial microbiota may contaminate the slides and media used to collect samples during corneal sampling. Use of a face mask can significantly decrease the rate of contamination of such samples.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5721650
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BMJ Open Ophthalmology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57216502018-01-19 Reducing oral contamination during corneal scrapes Samarawickrama, Chameen Li, Yi-Chiao Carnt, Nicole Willcox, Mark Dutta, Debarun Watson, Stephanie BMJ Open Ophthalmol Original Article AIMS: To identify potential contaminants of the corneal sampling procedure and examine the effect of wearing surgical face masks on the rate of contamination. METHODS: Ten surgeons recited out loud a 30 s standardised script for corneal scraping with blood agar plates positioned 30 cm away from them. Three groups were identified: in group 1 a surgical mask was worn; group 2 had no mask worn; and group 3 had no mask but used agar plates pretreated with 5% povidone-iodine as a negative control. Each surgeon repeated the process 10 times for all groups, totalling 30 plates per surgeon and 300 plates for the experiment. All plates were masked and incubated aerobically at 37°C for 24 hours, and the number of colony forming units (CFUs) was determined. RESULTS: At 24 hours, group 1 had a mean of 0.3 CFUs per surgeon; group 2 had 6.4 CFUs per surgeon and group 3 had 0.1 CFUs per surgeon. The difference between group 1 and group 2 was significant (p<0.001) whereas the difference between group 1 and group 3 was non-significant (p=0.4). Use of face masks decreased the number of plates with CFUs by 93% (from 29 to 2 plates) and decreased the total number of CFUs by 95% (from 63 to 3 CFUs). The most common microbiota identified was Streptococcus species. CONCLUSIONS: Oral bacterial microbiota may contaminate the slides and media used to collect samples during corneal sampling. Use of a face mask can significantly decrease the rate of contamination of such samples. BMJ Open Ophthalmology 2017-02-25 /pmc/articles/PMC5721650/ /pubmed/29354701 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjophth-2016-000044 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Original Article
Samarawickrama, Chameen
Li, Yi-Chiao
Carnt, Nicole
Willcox, Mark
Dutta, Debarun
Watson, Stephanie
Reducing oral contamination during corneal scrapes
title Reducing oral contamination during corneal scrapes
title_full Reducing oral contamination during corneal scrapes
title_fullStr Reducing oral contamination during corneal scrapes
title_full_unstemmed Reducing oral contamination during corneal scrapes
title_short Reducing oral contamination during corneal scrapes
title_sort reducing oral contamination during corneal scrapes
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5721650/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29354701
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjophth-2016-000044
work_keys_str_mv AT samarawickramachameen reducingoralcontaminationduringcornealscrapes
AT liyichiao reducingoralcontaminationduringcornealscrapes
AT carntnicole reducingoralcontaminationduringcornealscrapes
AT willcoxmark reducingoralcontaminationduringcornealscrapes
AT duttadebarun reducingoralcontaminationduringcornealscrapes
AT watsonstephanie reducingoralcontaminationduringcornealscrapes