Cargando…

Passive standing as an adjunct rehabilitation intervention after stroke: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Early physical rehabilitation enhances functional recovery in stroke survivors. Supported standing is a common adjunctive therapeutic practice in subjects with several central nervous diseases who are unable to stand actively. Data on the effect of supported positioning on standing frame...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ferrarello, Francesco, Deluca, Gabriella, Pizzi, Assunta, Baldini, Carlo, Iori, Francesca, Marchionni, Niccolò, Di Bari, Mauro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5721723/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29340171
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40945-015-0002-0
_version_ 1783284866588082176
author Ferrarello, Francesco
Deluca, Gabriella
Pizzi, Assunta
Baldini, Carlo
Iori, Francesca
Marchionni, Niccolò
Di Bari, Mauro
author_facet Ferrarello, Francesco
Deluca, Gabriella
Pizzi, Assunta
Baldini, Carlo
Iori, Francesca
Marchionni, Niccolò
Di Bari, Mauro
author_sort Ferrarello, Francesco
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Early physical rehabilitation enhances functional recovery in stroke survivors. Supported standing is a common adjunctive therapeutic practice in subjects with several central nervous diseases who are unable to stand actively. Data on the effect of supported positioning on standing frames in individuals with recent stroke are scarce and contradictory. OBJECTIVES: To verify if the addition of supported standing practice (SSP), delivered by means of a standing frame in two durations, to conventional physical therapy (CPT), may improve motor function, autonomy, and mobility in individuals with disability due to recent stroke. METHODS: After baseline assessment, 75 participants with severe disability due to stroke, all receiving CPT, were randomly assigned to adjunctive 20 or 40 min of SSP, or CPT only (control). Motor function, autonomy, and mobility were assessed before and after training, and three months later. RESULTS: All participants assessed received the planned dose of intervention. No adverse events of SSP were detected. Most outcome measures improved from baseline through the end of treatment and in the follow-up in all groups; the extent of change was comparable across the three randomization groups. CONCLUSIONS: In this randomized trial, SSP was unable to provide any sizeable adjunctive benefit, above and beyond CPT, in subjects with recent stroke.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5721723
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57217232018-01-16 Passive standing as an adjunct rehabilitation intervention after stroke: a randomized controlled trial Ferrarello, Francesco Deluca, Gabriella Pizzi, Assunta Baldini, Carlo Iori, Francesca Marchionni, Niccolò Di Bari, Mauro Arch Physiother Research Article BACKGROUND: Early physical rehabilitation enhances functional recovery in stroke survivors. Supported standing is a common adjunctive therapeutic practice in subjects with several central nervous diseases who are unable to stand actively. Data on the effect of supported positioning on standing frames in individuals with recent stroke are scarce and contradictory. OBJECTIVES: To verify if the addition of supported standing practice (SSP), delivered by means of a standing frame in two durations, to conventional physical therapy (CPT), may improve motor function, autonomy, and mobility in individuals with disability due to recent stroke. METHODS: After baseline assessment, 75 participants with severe disability due to stroke, all receiving CPT, were randomly assigned to adjunctive 20 or 40 min of SSP, or CPT only (control). Motor function, autonomy, and mobility were assessed before and after training, and three months later. RESULTS: All participants assessed received the planned dose of intervention. No adverse events of SSP were detected. Most outcome measures improved from baseline through the end of treatment and in the follow-up in all groups; the extent of change was comparable across the three randomization groups. CONCLUSIONS: In this randomized trial, SSP was unable to provide any sizeable adjunctive benefit, above and beyond CPT, in subjects with recent stroke. BioMed Central 2015-07-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5721723/ /pubmed/29340171 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40945-015-0002-0 Text en © Ferrarello et al. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ferrarello, Francesco
Deluca, Gabriella
Pizzi, Assunta
Baldini, Carlo
Iori, Francesca
Marchionni, Niccolò
Di Bari, Mauro
Passive standing as an adjunct rehabilitation intervention after stroke: a randomized controlled trial
title Passive standing as an adjunct rehabilitation intervention after stroke: a randomized controlled trial
title_full Passive standing as an adjunct rehabilitation intervention after stroke: a randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Passive standing as an adjunct rehabilitation intervention after stroke: a randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Passive standing as an adjunct rehabilitation intervention after stroke: a randomized controlled trial
title_short Passive standing as an adjunct rehabilitation intervention after stroke: a randomized controlled trial
title_sort passive standing as an adjunct rehabilitation intervention after stroke: a randomized controlled trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5721723/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29340171
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40945-015-0002-0
work_keys_str_mv AT ferrarellofrancesco passivestandingasanadjunctrehabilitationinterventionafterstrokearandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT delucagabriella passivestandingasanadjunctrehabilitationinterventionafterstrokearandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT pizziassunta passivestandingasanadjunctrehabilitationinterventionafterstrokearandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT baldinicarlo passivestandingasanadjunctrehabilitationinterventionafterstrokearandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT iorifrancesca passivestandingasanadjunctrehabilitationinterventionafterstrokearandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT marchionniniccolo passivestandingasanadjunctrehabilitationinterventionafterstrokearandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT dibarimauro passivestandingasanadjunctrehabilitationinterventionafterstrokearandomizedcontrolledtrial