Cargando…
Passive standing as an adjunct rehabilitation intervention after stroke: a randomized controlled trial
BACKGROUND: Early physical rehabilitation enhances functional recovery in stroke survivors. Supported standing is a common adjunctive therapeutic practice in subjects with several central nervous diseases who are unable to stand actively. Data on the effect of supported positioning on standing frame...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5721723/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29340171 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40945-015-0002-0 |
_version_ | 1783284866588082176 |
---|---|
author | Ferrarello, Francesco Deluca, Gabriella Pizzi, Assunta Baldini, Carlo Iori, Francesca Marchionni, Niccolò Di Bari, Mauro |
author_facet | Ferrarello, Francesco Deluca, Gabriella Pizzi, Assunta Baldini, Carlo Iori, Francesca Marchionni, Niccolò Di Bari, Mauro |
author_sort | Ferrarello, Francesco |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Early physical rehabilitation enhances functional recovery in stroke survivors. Supported standing is a common adjunctive therapeutic practice in subjects with several central nervous diseases who are unable to stand actively. Data on the effect of supported positioning on standing frames in individuals with recent stroke are scarce and contradictory. OBJECTIVES: To verify if the addition of supported standing practice (SSP), delivered by means of a standing frame in two durations, to conventional physical therapy (CPT), may improve motor function, autonomy, and mobility in individuals with disability due to recent stroke. METHODS: After baseline assessment, 75 participants with severe disability due to stroke, all receiving CPT, were randomly assigned to adjunctive 20 or 40 min of SSP, or CPT only (control). Motor function, autonomy, and mobility were assessed before and after training, and three months later. RESULTS: All participants assessed received the planned dose of intervention. No adverse events of SSP were detected. Most outcome measures improved from baseline through the end of treatment and in the follow-up in all groups; the extent of change was comparable across the three randomization groups. CONCLUSIONS: In this randomized trial, SSP was unable to provide any sizeable adjunctive benefit, above and beyond CPT, in subjects with recent stroke. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5721723 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57217232018-01-16 Passive standing as an adjunct rehabilitation intervention after stroke: a randomized controlled trial Ferrarello, Francesco Deluca, Gabriella Pizzi, Assunta Baldini, Carlo Iori, Francesca Marchionni, Niccolò Di Bari, Mauro Arch Physiother Research Article BACKGROUND: Early physical rehabilitation enhances functional recovery in stroke survivors. Supported standing is a common adjunctive therapeutic practice in subjects with several central nervous diseases who are unable to stand actively. Data on the effect of supported positioning on standing frames in individuals with recent stroke are scarce and contradictory. OBJECTIVES: To verify if the addition of supported standing practice (SSP), delivered by means of a standing frame in two durations, to conventional physical therapy (CPT), may improve motor function, autonomy, and mobility in individuals with disability due to recent stroke. METHODS: After baseline assessment, 75 participants with severe disability due to stroke, all receiving CPT, were randomly assigned to adjunctive 20 or 40 min of SSP, or CPT only (control). Motor function, autonomy, and mobility were assessed before and after training, and three months later. RESULTS: All participants assessed received the planned dose of intervention. No adverse events of SSP were detected. Most outcome measures improved from baseline through the end of treatment and in the follow-up in all groups; the extent of change was comparable across the three randomization groups. CONCLUSIONS: In this randomized trial, SSP was unable to provide any sizeable adjunctive benefit, above and beyond CPT, in subjects with recent stroke. BioMed Central 2015-07-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5721723/ /pubmed/29340171 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40945-015-0002-0 Text en © Ferrarello et al. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Ferrarello, Francesco Deluca, Gabriella Pizzi, Assunta Baldini, Carlo Iori, Francesca Marchionni, Niccolò Di Bari, Mauro Passive standing as an adjunct rehabilitation intervention after stroke: a randomized controlled trial |
title | Passive standing as an adjunct rehabilitation intervention after stroke: a randomized controlled trial |
title_full | Passive standing as an adjunct rehabilitation intervention after stroke: a randomized controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Passive standing as an adjunct rehabilitation intervention after stroke: a randomized controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Passive standing as an adjunct rehabilitation intervention after stroke: a randomized controlled trial |
title_short | Passive standing as an adjunct rehabilitation intervention after stroke: a randomized controlled trial |
title_sort | passive standing as an adjunct rehabilitation intervention after stroke: a randomized controlled trial |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5721723/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29340171 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40945-015-0002-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ferrarellofrancesco passivestandingasanadjunctrehabilitationinterventionafterstrokearandomizedcontrolledtrial AT delucagabriella passivestandingasanadjunctrehabilitationinterventionafterstrokearandomizedcontrolledtrial AT pizziassunta passivestandingasanadjunctrehabilitationinterventionafterstrokearandomizedcontrolledtrial AT baldinicarlo passivestandingasanadjunctrehabilitationinterventionafterstrokearandomizedcontrolledtrial AT iorifrancesca passivestandingasanadjunctrehabilitationinterventionafterstrokearandomizedcontrolledtrial AT marchionniniccolo passivestandingasanadjunctrehabilitationinterventionafterstrokearandomizedcontrolledtrial AT dibarimauro passivestandingasanadjunctrehabilitationinterventionafterstrokearandomizedcontrolledtrial |