Cargando…

Contemporary Risk Stratification After Myocardial Infarction in the Community: Performance of Scores and Incremental Value of Soluble Suppression of Tumorigenicity‐2

BACKGROUND: Current American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology guidelines recommend the GRACE (Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events) and TIMI (Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction) scores to assess myocardial infarction (MI) prognosis. Changes in the epidemiological characteristi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gerber, Yariv, Weston, Susan A., Enriquez‐Sarano, Maurice, Jaffe, Allan S., Manemann, Sheila M., Jiang, Ruoxiang, Roger, Véronique L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5721833/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29054840
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.117.005958
_version_ 1783284892141879296
author Gerber, Yariv
Weston, Susan A.
Enriquez‐Sarano, Maurice
Jaffe, Allan S.
Manemann, Sheila M.
Jiang, Ruoxiang
Roger, Véronique L.
author_facet Gerber, Yariv
Weston, Susan A.
Enriquez‐Sarano, Maurice
Jaffe, Allan S.
Manemann, Sheila M.
Jiang, Ruoxiang
Roger, Véronique L.
author_sort Gerber, Yariv
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Current American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology guidelines recommend the GRACE (Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events) and TIMI (Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction) scores to assess myocardial infarction (MI) prognosis. Changes in the epidemiological characteristics of MI and the availability of new biomarkers warrant an assessment of the performance of these scores in contemporary practice. We assessed the following: (1) the performance of GRACE and TIMI to predict 1‐year mortality in a cohort of patients stratified by ST‐segment elevation MI (STEMI) and non‐STEMI (NSTEMI) and (2) the incremental discriminatory power of soluble suppression of tumorigenicity‐2, a myocardial fibrosis biomarker. METHODS AND RESULTS: Olmsted County, Minnesota, residents with incident MI (N=1401) were recruited prospectively from November 1, 2002 to December 31, 2012 (mean age, 67 years; 61% men; 79% with NSTEMI). Baseline data were used to calculate risk scores; soluble suppression of tumorigenicity‐2 was measured in stored plasma samples obtained at index MI. C‐statistics adapted to survival data were used to assess the discriminatory power of the risk scores and the improvement gained by adding other markers. During the first year of follow‐up, 190 patients (14%) died. The discriminatory performance to predict death was reasonable for GRACE and poor for TIMI, and was generally worse in those with NSTEMI versus those with STEMI. In people with NSTEMI, sequential addition of comorbidities and soluble suppression of tumorigenicity‐2 substantially improved the c‐statistic over GRACE (from 0.78 to 0.80 to 0.84) and TIMI (from 0.61 to 0.73 to 0.81), respectively (all P≤0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Guideline‐recommended scores for risk assessment after MI underperform in contemporary community patients, particularly those with NSTEMI, which now represents most infarcts. Incorporating comorbidities and soluble suppression of tumorigenicity‐2 substantially improves risk prediction, thereby delineating opportunities to improve clinical care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5721833
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57218332017-12-12 Contemporary Risk Stratification After Myocardial Infarction in the Community: Performance of Scores and Incremental Value of Soluble Suppression of Tumorigenicity‐2 Gerber, Yariv Weston, Susan A. Enriquez‐Sarano, Maurice Jaffe, Allan S. Manemann, Sheila M. Jiang, Ruoxiang Roger, Véronique L. J Am Heart Assoc Original Research BACKGROUND: Current American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology guidelines recommend the GRACE (Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events) and TIMI (Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction) scores to assess myocardial infarction (MI) prognosis. Changes in the epidemiological characteristics of MI and the availability of new biomarkers warrant an assessment of the performance of these scores in contemporary practice. We assessed the following: (1) the performance of GRACE and TIMI to predict 1‐year mortality in a cohort of patients stratified by ST‐segment elevation MI (STEMI) and non‐STEMI (NSTEMI) and (2) the incremental discriminatory power of soluble suppression of tumorigenicity‐2, a myocardial fibrosis biomarker. METHODS AND RESULTS: Olmsted County, Minnesota, residents with incident MI (N=1401) were recruited prospectively from November 1, 2002 to December 31, 2012 (mean age, 67 years; 61% men; 79% with NSTEMI). Baseline data were used to calculate risk scores; soluble suppression of tumorigenicity‐2 was measured in stored plasma samples obtained at index MI. C‐statistics adapted to survival data were used to assess the discriminatory power of the risk scores and the improvement gained by adding other markers. During the first year of follow‐up, 190 patients (14%) died. The discriminatory performance to predict death was reasonable for GRACE and poor for TIMI, and was generally worse in those with NSTEMI versus those with STEMI. In people with NSTEMI, sequential addition of comorbidities and soluble suppression of tumorigenicity‐2 substantially improved the c‐statistic over GRACE (from 0.78 to 0.80 to 0.84) and TIMI (from 0.61 to 0.73 to 0.81), respectively (all P≤0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Guideline‐recommended scores for risk assessment after MI underperform in contemporary community patients, particularly those with NSTEMI, which now represents most infarcts. Incorporating comorbidities and soluble suppression of tumorigenicity‐2 substantially improves risk prediction, thereby delineating opportunities to improve clinical care. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-10-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5721833/ /pubmed/29054840 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.117.005958 Text en © 2017 The Authors and Mayo Clinic. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Research
Gerber, Yariv
Weston, Susan A.
Enriquez‐Sarano, Maurice
Jaffe, Allan S.
Manemann, Sheila M.
Jiang, Ruoxiang
Roger, Véronique L.
Contemporary Risk Stratification After Myocardial Infarction in the Community: Performance of Scores and Incremental Value of Soluble Suppression of Tumorigenicity‐2
title Contemporary Risk Stratification After Myocardial Infarction in the Community: Performance of Scores and Incremental Value of Soluble Suppression of Tumorigenicity‐2
title_full Contemporary Risk Stratification After Myocardial Infarction in the Community: Performance of Scores and Incremental Value of Soluble Suppression of Tumorigenicity‐2
title_fullStr Contemporary Risk Stratification After Myocardial Infarction in the Community: Performance of Scores and Incremental Value of Soluble Suppression of Tumorigenicity‐2
title_full_unstemmed Contemporary Risk Stratification After Myocardial Infarction in the Community: Performance of Scores and Incremental Value of Soluble Suppression of Tumorigenicity‐2
title_short Contemporary Risk Stratification After Myocardial Infarction in the Community: Performance of Scores and Incremental Value of Soluble Suppression of Tumorigenicity‐2
title_sort contemporary risk stratification after myocardial infarction in the community: performance of scores and incremental value of soluble suppression of tumorigenicity‐2
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5721833/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29054840
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.117.005958
work_keys_str_mv AT gerberyariv contemporaryriskstratificationaftermyocardialinfarctioninthecommunityperformanceofscoresandincrementalvalueofsolublesuppressionoftumorigenicity2
AT westonsusana contemporaryriskstratificationaftermyocardialinfarctioninthecommunityperformanceofscoresandincrementalvalueofsolublesuppressionoftumorigenicity2
AT enriquezsaranomaurice contemporaryriskstratificationaftermyocardialinfarctioninthecommunityperformanceofscoresandincrementalvalueofsolublesuppressionoftumorigenicity2
AT jaffeallans contemporaryriskstratificationaftermyocardialinfarctioninthecommunityperformanceofscoresandincrementalvalueofsolublesuppressionoftumorigenicity2
AT manemannsheilam contemporaryriskstratificationaftermyocardialinfarctioninthecommunityperformanceofscoresandincrementalvalueofsolublesuppressionoftumorigenicity2
AT jiangruoxiang contemporaryriskstratificationaftermyocardialinfarctioninthecommunityperformanceofscoresandincrementalvalueofsolublesuppressionoftumorigenicity2
AT rogerveroniquel contemporaryriskstratificationaftermyocardialinfarctioninthecommunityperformanceofscoresandincrementalvalueofsolublesuppressionoftumorigenicity2