Cargando…
Low Prevalence of Inappropriate Shocks in Patients With Inherited Arrhythmia Syndromes With the Subcutaneous Implantable Defibrillator Single Center Experience and Long‐Term Follow‐Up
BACKGROUND: Up to 40% of patients with transvenous implantable cardioverter‐defibrillator (ICD) experience lead‐associated complications and may suffer from high complication rates when lead extraction is indicated. Subcutaneous ICD may represent a feasible alternative; however, the efficacy of the...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5721842/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29042423 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.117.006265 |
_version_ | 1783284894299848704 |
---|---|
author | Rudic, Boris Tülümen, Erol Berlin, Veronika Röger, Susanne Stach, Ksenija Liebe, Volker El‐Battrawy, Ibrahim Dösch, Christina Papavassiliu, Theano Akin, Ibrahim Borggrefe, Martin Kuschyk, Jürgen |
author_facet | Rudic, Boris Tülümen, Erol Berlin, Veronika Röger, Susanne Stach, Ksenija Liebe, Volker El‐Battrawy, Ibrahim Dösch, Christina Papavassiliu, Theano Akin, Ibrahim Borggrefe, Martin Kuschyk, Jürgen |
author_sort | Rudic, Boris |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Up to 40% of patients with transvenous implantable cardioverter‐defibrillator (ICD) experience lead‐associated complications and may suffer from high complication rates when lead extraction is indicated. Subcutaneous ICD may represent a feasible alternative; however, the efficacy of the subcutaneous ICD in the detection and treatment of ventricular arrhythmias in patients with hereditary arrhythmia syndromes has not been fully evaluated. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients with primary hereditary arrhythmia syndromes who fulfilled indication for defibrillator placement were eligible for enrollment. Between 2010 and 2016, 62 consecutive patients with primary hereditary arrhythmia syndromes, without indication for antibradycardia therapy, were enrolled in the study. Mean follow‐up was 31.0±14.2 months. The study cohort comprised of 24 patients with Brugada syndrome, 17 with idiopathic ventricular fibrillation, 6 with long‐QT syndrome, 1 with short‐QT syndrome, 3 with catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia, 8 with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, and 3 with arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy. Thirty‐nine patients were implanted for secondary prevention. Twenty‐two patients had a previous transvenous ICD implanted, but required revision because of infection or lead defects. A total of 20 spontaneous ventricular tachyarrhythmias requiring shock intervention occurred in 10 patients during follow‐up. All episodes were terminated within the first ICD shock delivery with 80 J. Two patients had inappropriate therapies caused by oversensing following an uneventful implantation. No pocket‐site infections and no premature revisions have occurred during follow‐up. CONCLUSIONS: Our study supports the use of the subcutaneous ICD for both secondary and primary prevention of sudden cardiac death as a reliable alternative to the conventional transvenous ICD. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5721842 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57218422017-12-12 Low Prevalence of Inappropriate Shocks in Patients With Inherited Arrhythmia Syndromes With the Subcutaneous Implantable Defibrillator Single Center Experience and Long‐Term Follow‐Up Rudic, Boris Tülümen, Erol Berlin, Veronika Röger, Susanne Stach, Ksenija Liebe, Volker El‐Battrawy, Ibrahim Dösch, Christina Papavassiliu, Theano Akin, Ibrahim Borggrefe, Martin Kuschyk, Jürgen J Am Heart Assoc Original Research BACKGROUND: Up to 40% of patients with transvenous implantable cardioverter‐defibrillator (ICD) experience lead‐associated complications and may suffer from high complication rates when lead extraction is indicated. Subcutaneous ICD may represent a feasible alternative; however, the efficacy of the subcutaneous ICD in the detection and treatment of ventricular arrhythmias in patients with hereditary arrhythmia syndromes has not been fully evaluated. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients with primary hereditary arrhythmia syndromes who fulfilled indication for defibrillator placement were eligible for enrollment. Between 2010 and 2016, 62 consecutive patients with primary hereditary arrhythmia syndromes, without indication for antibradycardia therapy, were enrolled in the study. Mean follow‐up was 31.0±14.2 months. The study cohort comprised of 24 patients with Brugada syndrome, 17 with idiopathic ventricular fibrillation, 6 with long‐QT syndrome, 1 with short‐QT syndrome, 3 with catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia, 8 with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, and 3 with arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy. Thirty‐nine patients were implanted for secondary prevention. Twenty‐two patients had a previous transvenous ICD implanted, but required revision because of infection or lead defects. A total of 20 spontaneous ventricular tachyarrhythmias requiring shock intervention occurred in 10 patients during follow‐up. All episodes were terminated within the first ICD shock delivery with 80 J. Two patients had inappropriate therapies caused by oversensing following an uneventful implantation. No pocket‐site infections and no premature revisions have occurred during follow‐up. CONCLUSIONS: Our study supports the use of the subcutaneous ICD for both secondary and primary prevention of sudden cardiac death as a reliable alternative to the conventional transvenous ICD. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-10-17 /pmc/articles/PMC5721842/ /pubmed/29042423 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.117.006265 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Rudic, Boris Tülümen, Erol Berlin, Veronika Röger, Susanne Stach, Ksenija Liebe, Volker El‐Battrawy, Ibrahim Dösch, Christina Papavassiliu, Theano Akin, Ibrahim Borggrefe, Martin Kuschyk, Jürgen Low Prevalence of Inappropriate Shocks in Patients With Inherited Arrhythmia Syndromes With the Subcutaneous Implantable Defibrillator Single Center Experience and Long‐Term Follow‐Up |
title | Low Prevalence of Inappropriate Shocks in Patients With Inherited Arrhythmia Syndromes With the Subcutaneous Implantable Defibrillator Single Center Experience and Long‐Term Follow‐Up |
title_full | Low Prevalence of Inappropriate Shocks in Patients With Inherited Arrhythmia Syndromes With the Subcutaneous Implantable Defibrillator Single Center Experience and Long‐Term Follow‐Up |
title_fullStr | Low Prevalence of Inappropriate Shocks in Patients With Inherited Arrhythmia Syndromes With the Subcutaneous Implantable Defibrillator Single Center Experience and Long‐Term Follow‐Up |
title_full_unstemmed | Low Prevalence of Inappropriate Shocks in Patients With Inherited Arrhythmia Syndromes With the Subcutaneous Implantable Defibrillator Single Center Experience and Long‐Term Follow‐Up |
title_short | Low Prevalence of Inappropriate Shocks in Patients With Inherited Arrhythmia Syndromes With the Subcutaneous Implantable Defibrillator Single Center Experience and Long‐Term Follow‐Up |
title_sort | low prevalence of inappropriate shocks in patients with inherited arrhythmia syndromes with the subcutaneous implantable defibrillator single center experience and long‐term follow‐up |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5721842/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29042423 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.117.006265 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rudicboris lowprevalenceofinappropriateshocksinpatientswithinheritedarrhythmiasyndromeswiththesubcutaneousimplantabledefibrillatorsinglecenterexperienceandlongtermfollowup AT tulumenerol lowprevalenceofinappropriateshocksinpatientswithinheritedarrhythmiasyndromeswiththesubcutaneousimplantabledefibrillatorsinglecenterexperienceandlongtermfollowup AT berlinveronika lowprevalenceofinappropriateshocksinpatientswithinheritedarrhythmiasyndromeswiththesubcutaneousimplantabledefibrillatorsinglecenterexperienceandlongtermfollowup AT rogersusanne lowprevalenceofinappropriateshocksinpatientswithinheritedarrhythmiasyndromeswiththesubcutaneousimplantabledefibrillatorsinglecenterexperienceandlongtermfollowup AT stachksenija lowprevalenceofinappropriateshocksinpatientswithinheritedarrhythmiasyndromeswiththesubcutaneousimplantabledefibrillatorsinglecenterexperienceandlongtermfollowup AT liebevolker lowprevalenceofinappropriateshocksinpatientswithinheritedarrhythmiasyndromeswiththesubcutaneousimplantabledefibrillatorsinglecenterexperienceandlongtermfollowup AT elbattrawyibrahim lowprevalenceofinappropriateshocksinpatientswithinheritedarrhythmiasyndromeswiththesubcutaneousimplantabledefibrillatorsinglecenterexperienceandlongtermfollowup AT doschchristina lowprevalenceofinappropriateshocksinpatientswithinheritedarrhythmiasyndromeswiththesubcutaneousimplantabledefibrillatorsinglecenterexperienceandlongtermfollowup AT papavassiliutheano lowprevalenceofinappropriateshocksinpatientswithinheritedarrhythmiasyndromeswiththesubcutaneousimplantabledefibrillatorsinglecenterexperienceandlongtermfollowup AT akinibrahim lowprevalenceofinappropriateshocksinpatientswithinheritedarrhythmiasyndromeswiththesubcutaneousimplantabledefibrillatorsinglecenterexperienceandlongtermfollowup AT borggrefemartin lowprevalenceofinappropriateshocksinpatientswithinheritedarrhythmiasyndromeswiththesubcutaneousimplantabledefibrillatorsinglecenterexperienceandlongtermfollowup AT kuschykjurgen lowprevalenceofinappropriateshocksinpatientswithinheritedarrhythmiasyndromeswiththesubcutaneousimplantabledefibrillatorsinglecenterexperienceandlongtermfollowup |