Cargando…

Multivessel Versus Culprit Vessel–Only Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Among Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction: Insights From the TRANSLATE‐ACS Observational Study

BACKGROUND: Among patients with acute myocardial infarction (MI) who have multivessel disease, it is unclear if multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) improves clinical and quality‐of‐life outcomes compared with culprit‐only intervention. We sought to compare clinical and quality‐of‐li...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ibrahim, Homam, Sharma, Praneet K., Cohen, David J., Fonarow, Gregg C., Kaltenbach, Lisa A., Effron, Mark B., Zettler, Marjorie E., Peterson, Eric D., Wang, Tracy Y.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5721846/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28982673
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.117.006343
_version_ 1783284895273975808
author Ibrahim, Homam
Sharma, Praneet K.
Cohen, David J.
Fonarow, Gregg C.
Kaltenbach, Lisa A.
Effron, Mark B.
Zettler, Marjorie E.
Peterson, Eric D.
Wang, Tracy Y.
author_facet Ibrahim, Homam
Sharma, Praneet K.
Cohen, David J.
Fonarow, Gregg C.
Kaltenbach, Lisa A.
Effron, Mark B.
Zettler, Marjorie E.
Peterson, Eric D.
Wang, Tracy Y.
author_sort Ibrahim, Homam
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Among patients with acute myocardial infarction (MI) who have multivessel disease, it is unclear if multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) improves clinical and quality‐of‐life outcomes compared with culprit‐only intervention. We sought to compare clinical and quality‐of‐life outcomes between multivessel and culprit‐only PCI. METHODS AND RESULTS: Among 6061 patients with acute MI who have multivessel disease in the TRANSLATE‐ACS (Treatment With Adenosine Diphosphate Receptor Inhibitors: Longitudinal Assessment of Treatment Patterns and Events After Acute Coronary Syndrome) study, we used inverse probability‐weighted propensity adjustment to study the associations between multivessel and culprit‐only intervention during the index PCI and major adverse cardiovascular events, unplanned all‐cause readmission, and angina frequency at 6 weeks and 1 year. Multivessel PCI was performed in 1208 (20%) of patients with MI who had multivessel disease. Relative to the culprit‐only intervention, patients receiving multivessel PCI were similarly aged and more likely to be seen with non–ST‐segment elevation MI or cardiogenic shock. At 6 weeks, the initial multivessel PCI strategy was associated with lower major adverse cardiovascular events and unplanned readmission risks, whereas angina frequency was not significantly different between multivessel and culprit‐only PCI. At 1 year, major adverse cardiovascular event risk was persistently lower in the multivessel PCI group (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.84; 95% confidence interval, 0.72–0.99), whereas long‐term readmission risk (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.94; 95% confidence interval, 0.84–1.04) and angina frequency were similar between groups (adjusted odds ratio, 1.01; 95% confidence interval, 0.82–1.24). Similar associations were seen when patients with ST‐segment elevation MI and non–ST‐segment elevation MI were examined separately. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with acute MI who have multivessel disease, multivessel PCI was associated with lower risk of all‐cause readmission at 6 weeks and lower risk of major adverse cardiovascular events at 6 weeks and 1 year. However, similar short‐ and long‐term angina frequencies were noted.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5721846
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57218462017-12-12 Multivessel Versus Culprit Vessel–Only Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Among Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction: Insights From the TRANSLATE‐ACS Observational Study Ibrahim, Homam Sharma, Praneet K. Cohen, David J. Fonarow, Gregg C. Kaltenbach, Lisa A. Effron, Mark B. Zettler, Marjorie E. Peterson, Eric D. Wang, Tracy Y. J Am Heart Assoc Original Research BACKGROUND: Among patients with acute myocardial infarction (MI) who have multivessel disease, it is unclear if multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) improves clinical and quality‐of‐life outcomes compared with culprit‐only intervention. We sought to compare clinical and quality‐of‐life outcomes between multivessel and culprit‐only PCI. METHODS AND RESULTS: Among 6061 patients with acute MI who have multivessel disease in the TRANSLATE‐ACS (Treatment With Adenosine Diphosphate Receptor Inhibitors: Longitudinal Assessment of Treatment Patterns and Events After Acute Coronary Syndrome) study, we used inverse probability‐weighted propensity adjustment to study the associations between multivessel and culprit‐only intervention during the index PCI and major adverse cardiovascular events, unplanned all‐cause readmission, and angina frequency at 6 weeks and 1 year. Multivessel PCI was performed in 1208 (20%) of patients with MI who had multivessel disease. Relative to the culprit‐only intervention, patients receiving multivessel PCI were similarly aged and more likely to be seen with non–ST‐segment elevation MI or cardiogenic shock. At 6 weeks, the initial multivessel PCI strategy was associated with lower major adverse cardiovascular events and unplanned readmission risks, whereas angina frequency was not significantly different between multivessel and culprit‐only PCI. At 1 year, major adverse cardiovascular event risk was persistently lower in the multivessel PCI group (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.84; 95% confidence interval, 0.72–0.99), whereas long‐term readmission risk (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.94; 95% confidence interval, 0.84–1.04) and angina frequency were similar between groups (adjusted odds ratio, 1.01; 95% confidence interval, 0.82–1.24). Similar associations were seen when patients with ST‐segment elevation MI and non–ST‐segment elevation MI were examined separately. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with acute MI who have multivessel disease, multivessel PCI was associated with lower risk of all‐cause readmission at 6 weeks and lower risk of major adverse cardiovascular events at 6 weeks and 1 year. However, similar short‐ and long‐term angina frequencies were noted. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-10-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5721846/ /pubmed/28982673 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.117.006343 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial‐NoDerivs (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Research
Ibrahim, Homam
Sharma, Praneet K.
Cohen, David J.
Fonarow, Gregg C.
Kaltenbach, Lisa A.
Effron, Mark B.
Zettler, Marjorie E.
Peterson, Eric D.
Wang, Tracy Y.
Multivessel Versus Culprit Vessel–Only Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Among Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction: Insights From the TRANSLATE‐ACS Observational Study
title Multivessel Versus Culprit Vessel–Only Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Among Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction: Insights From the TRANSLATE‐ACS Observational Study
title_full Multivessel Versus Culprit Vessel–Only Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Among Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction: Insights From the TRANSLATE‐ACS Observational Study
title_fullStr Multivessel Versus Culprit Vessel–Only Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Among Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction: Insights From the TRANSLATE‐ACS Observational Study
title_full_unstemmed Multivessel Versus Culprit Vessel–Only Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Among Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction: Insights From the TRANSLATE‐ACS Observational Study
title_short Multivessel Versus Culprit Vessel–Only Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Among Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction: Insights From the TRANSLATE‐ACS Observational Study
title_sort multivessel versus culprit vessel–only percutaneous coronary intervention among patients with acute myocardial infarction: insights from the translate‐acs observational study
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5721846/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28982673
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.117.006343
work_keys_str_mv AT ibrahimhomam multivesselversusculpritvesselonlypercutaneouscoronaryinterventionamongpatientswithacutemyocardialinfarctioninsightsfromthetranslateacsobservationalstudy
AT sharmapraneetk multivesselversusculpritvesselonlypercutaneouscoronaryinterventionamongpatientswithacutemyocardialinfarctioninsightsfromthetranslateacsobservationalstudy
AT cohendavidj multivesselversusculpritvesselonlypercutaneouscoronaryinterventionamongpatientswithacutemyocardialinfarctioninsightsfromthetranslateacsobservationalstudy
AT fonarowgreggc multivesselversusculpritvesselonlypercutaneouscoronaryinterventionamongpatientswithacutemyocardialinfarctioninsightsfromthetranslateacsobservationalstudy
AT kaltenbachlisaa multivesselversusculpritvesselonlypercutaneouscoronaryinterventionamongpatientswithacutemyocardialinfarctioninsightsfromthetranslateacsobservationalstudy
AT effronmarkb multivesselversusculpritvesselonlypercutaneouscoronaryinterventionamongpatientswithacutemyocardialinfarctioninsightsfromthetranslateacsobservationalstudy
AT zettlermarjoriee multivesselversusculpritvesselonlypercutaneouscoronaryinterventionamongpatientswithacutemyocardialinfarctioninsightsfromthetranslateacsobservationalstudy
AT petersonericd multivesselversusculpritvesselonlypercutaneouscoronaryinterventionamongpatientswithacutemyocardialinfarctioninsightsfromthetranslateacsobservationalstudy
AT wangtracyy multivesselversusculpritvesselonlypercutaneouscoronaryinterventionamongpatientswithacutemyocardialinfarctioninsightsfromthetranslateacsobservationalstudy