Cargando…
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Using Quadripolar Versus Non‐Quadripolar Left Ventricular Leads Programmed to Biventricular Pacing With Single‐Site Left Ventricular Pacing: Impact on Survival and Heart Failure Hospitalization
BACKGROUND: In cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), quadripolar (QUAD) left ventricular (LV) leads are less prone to postoperative complications than non‐QUAD leads. Some studies have suggested better clinical outcomes. METHODS AND RESULTS: Clinical events were assessed in 847 patients after CRT...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5721885/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29042422 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.117.007026 |
_version_ | 1783284905010003968 |
---|---|
author | Leyva, Francisco Zegard, Abbasin Qiu, Tian Acquaye, Edmund Ferrante, Gaetano Walton, Jamie Marshall, Howard |
author_facet | Leyva, Francisco Zegard, Abbasin Qiu, Tian Acquaye, Edmund Ferrante, Gaetano Walton, Jamie Marshall, Howard |
author_sort | Leyva, Francisco |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: In cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), quadripolar (QUAD) left ventricular (LV) leads are less prone to postoperative complications than non‐QUAD leads. Some studies have suggested better clinical outcomes. METHODS AND RESULTS: Clinical events were assessed in 847 patients after CRT‐pacing or CRT‐defibrillation using either QUAD (n=287) or non‐QUAD (n=560), programmed to single‐site site LV pacing. Over a follow‐up period of 3.2 years (median [interquartile range, 1.90–5.0]), QUAD was associated with a lower total mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 0.32, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.20–0.52), cardiac mortality (aHR: 0.36, 95% CI, 0.20–0.65), and heart failure (HF) hospitalization (aHR: 0.62, 95% CI, 0.39–0.99), after adjustment for age, sex, New York Heart Association class, HF etiology, device type (CRT‐pacing or CRT‐defibrillation), comorbidities, atrial rhythm, medication, left ventricular ejection fraction, and creatinine. Death from pump failure was lower with QUAD (aHR: 0.33; 95% CI, 0.18–0.62), but no group differences emerged with respect to sudden cardiac death. There were no differences in implant‐related complications. Re‐interventions for LV displacement or phrenic nerve stimulation, which were lower with QUAD, predicted total mortality (aHR: 1.68, 95% CI, 1.11–2.54), cardiac mortality (aHR: 2.61, 95% CI, 1.66–4.11) and HF hospitalization (aHR: 2.09, 95% CI, 1.22–3.58). CONCLUSIONS: CRT using QUAD, programmed to biventricular pacing with single‐site LV pacing, is associated with a lower total mortality, cardiac mortality, and HF hospitalization. These trends were observed for both CRT‐defibrillation and CRT‐pacing, after adjustment for HF cause and other confounders. Re‐intervention for LV lead displacement or phrenic nerve stimulation was associated with worse outcomes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5721885 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57218852017-12-12 Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Using Quadripolar Versus Non‐Quadripolar Left Ventricular Leads Programmed to Biventricular Pacing With Single‐Site Left Ventricular Pacing: Impact on Survival and Heart Failure Hospitalization Leyva, Francisco Zegard, Abbasin Qiu, Tian Acquaye, Edmund Ferrante, Gaetano Walton, Jamie Marshall, Howard J Am Heart Assoc Original Research BACKGROUND: In cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), quadripolar (QUAD) left ventricular (LV) leads are less prone to postoperative complications than non‐QUAD leads. Some studies have suggested better clinical outcomes. METHODS AND RESULTS: Clinical events were assessed in 847 patients after CRT‐pacing or CRT‐defibrillation using either QUAD (n=287) or non‐QUAD (n=560), programmed to single‐site site LV pacing. Over a follow‐up period of 3.2 years (median [interquartile range, 1.90–5.0]), QUAD was associated with a lower total mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 0.32, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.20–0.52), cardiac mortality (aHR: 0.36, 95% CI, 0.20–0.65), and heart failure (HF) hospitalization (aHR: 0.62, 95% CI, 0.39–0.99), after adjustment for age, sex, New York Heart Association class, HF etiology, device type (CRT‐pacing or CRT‐defibrillation), comorbidities, atrial rhythm, medication, left ventricular ejection fraction, and creatinine. Death from pump failure was lower with QUAD (aHR: 0.33; 95% CI, 0.18–0.62), but no group differences emerged with respect to sudden cardiac death. There were no differences in implant‐related complications. Re‐interventions for LV displacement or phrenic nerve stimulation, which were lower with QUAD, predicted total mortality (aHR: 1.68, 95% CI, 1.11–2.54), cardiac mortality (aHR: 2.61, 95% CI, 1.66–4.11) and HF hospitalization (aHR: 2.09, 95% CI, 1.22–3.58). CONCLUSIONS: CRT using QUAD, programmed to biventricular pacing with single‐site LV pacing, is associated with a lower total mortality, cardiac mortality, and HF hospitalization. These trends were observed for both CRT‐defibrillation and CRT‐pacing, after adjustment for HF cause and other confounders. Re‐intervention for LV lead displacement or phrenic nerve stimulation was associated with worse outcomes. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-10-17 /pmc/articles/PMC5721885/ /pubmed/29042422 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.117.007026 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Leyva, Francisco Zegard, Abbasin Qiu, Tian Acquaye, Edmund Ferrante, Gaetano Walton, Jamie Marshall, Howard Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Using Quadripolar Versus Non‐Quadripolar Left Ventricular Leads Programmed to Biventricular Pacing With Single‐Site Left Ventricular Pacing: Impact on Survival and Heart Failure Hospitalization |
title | Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Using Quadripolar Versus Non‐Quadripolar Left Ventricular Leads Programmed to Biventricular Pacing With Single‐Site Left Ventricular Pacing: Impact on Survival and Heart Failure Hospitalization |
title_full | Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Using Quadripolar Versus Non‐Quadripolar Left Ventricular Leads Programmed to Biventricular Pacing With Single‐Site Left Ventricular Pacing: Impact on Survival and Heart Failure Hospitalization |
title_fullStr | Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Using Quadripolar Versus Non‐Quadripolar Left Ventricular Leads Programmed to Biventricular Pacing With Single‐Site Left Ventricular Pacing: Impact on Survival and Heart Failure Hospitalization |
title_full_unstemmed | Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Using Quadripolar Versus Non‐Quadripolar Left Ventricular Leads Programmed to Biventricular Pacing With Single‐Site Left Ventricular Pacing: Impact on Survival and Heart Failure Hospitalization |
title_short | Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Using Quadripolar Versus Non‐Quadripolar Left Ventricular Leads Programmed to Biventricular Pacing With Single‐Site Left Ventricular Pacing: Impact on Survival and Heart Failure Hospitalization |
title_sort | cardiac resynchronization therapy using quadripolar versus non‐quadripolar left ventricular leads programmed to biventricular pacing with single‐site left ventricular pacing: impact on survival and heart failure hospitalization |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5721885/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29042422 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.117.007026 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT leyvafrancisco cardiacresynchronizationtherapyusingquadripolarversusnonquadripolarleftventricularleadsprogrammedtobiventricularpacingwithsinglesiteleftventricularpacingimpactonsurvivalandheartfailurehospitalization AT zegardabbasin cardiacresynchronizationtherapyusingquadripolarversusnonquadripolarleftventricularleadsprogrammedtobiventricularpacingwithsinglesiteleftventricularpacingimpactonsurvivalandheartfailurehospitalization AT qiutian cardiacresynchronizationtherapyusingquadripolarversusnonquadripolarleftventricularleadsprogrammedtobiventricularpacingwithsinglesiteleftventricularpacingimpactonsurvivalandheartfailurehospitalization AT acquayeedmund cardiacresynchronizationtherapyusingquadripolarversusnonquadripolarleftventricularleadsprogrammedtobiventricularpacingwithsinglesiteleftventricularpacingimpactonsurvivalandheartfailurehospitalization AT ferrantegaetano cardiacresynchronizationtherapyusingquadripolarversusnonquadripolarleftventricularleadsprogrammedtobiventricularpacingwithsinglesiteleftventricularpacingimpactonsurvivalandheartfailurehospitalization AT waltonjamie cardiacresynchronizationtherapyusingquadripolarversusnonquadripolarleftventricularleadsprogrammedtobiventricularpacingwithsinglesiteleftventricularpacingimpactonsurvivalandheartfailurehospitalization AT marshallhoward cardiacresynchronizationtherapyusingquadripolarversusnonquadripolarleftventricularleadsprogrammedtobiventricularpacingwithsinglesiteleftventricularpacingimpactonsurvivalandheartfailurehospitalization |