Cargando…

Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Using Quadripolar Versus Non‐Quadripolar Left Ventricular Leads Programmed to Biventricular Pacing With Single‐Site Left Ventricular Pacing: Impact on Survival and Heart Failure Hospitalization

BACKGROUND: In cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), quadripolar (QUAD) left ventricular (LV) leads are less prone to postoperative complications than non‐QUAD leads. Some studies have suggested better clinical outcomes. METHODS AND RESULTS: Clinical events were assessed in 847 patients after CRT...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Leyva, Francisco, Zegard, Abbasin, Qiu, Tian, Acquaye, Edmund, Ferrante, Gaetano, Walton, Jamie, Marshall, Howard
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5721885/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29042422
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.117.007026
_version_ 1783284905010003968
author Leyva, Francisco
Zegard, Abbasin
Qiu, Tian
Acquaye, Edmund
Ferrante, Gaetano
Walton, Jamie
Marshall, Howard
author_facet Leyva, Francisco
Zegard, Abbasin
Qiu, Tian
Acquaye, Edmund
Ferrante, Gaetano
Walton, Jamie
Marshall, Howard
author_sort Leyva, Francisco
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), quadripolar (QUAD) left ventricular (LV) leads are less prone to postoperative complications than non‐QUAD leads. Some studies have suggested better clinical outcomes. METHODS AND RESULTS: Clinical events were assessed in 847 patients after CRT‐pacing or CRT‐defibrillation using either QUAD (n=287) or non‐QUAD (n=560), programmed to single‐site site LV pacing. Over a follow‐up period of 3.2 years (median [interquartile range, 1.90–5.0]), QUAD was associated with a lower total mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 0.32, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.20–0.52), cardiac mortality (aHR: 0.36, 95% CI, 0.20–0.65), and heart failure (HF) hospitalization (aHR: 0.62, 95% CI, 0.39–0.99), after adjustment for age, sex, New York Heart Association class, HF etiology, device type (CRT‐pacing or CRT‐defibrillation), comorbidities, atrial rhythm, medication, left ventricular ejection fraction, and creatinine. Death from pump failure was lower with QUAD (aHR: 0.33; 95% CI, 0.18–0.62), but no group differences emerged with respect to sudden cardiac death. There were no differences in implant‐related complications. Re‐interventions for LV displacement or phrenic nerve stimulation, which were lower with QUAD, predicted total mortality (aHR: 1.68, 95% CI, 1.11–2.54), cardiac mortality (aHR: 2.61, 95% CI, 1.66–4.11) and HF hospitalization (aHR: 2.09, 95% CI, 1.22–3.58). CONCLUSIONS: CRT using QUAD, programmed to biventricular pacing with single‐site LV pacing, is associated with a lower total mortality, cardiac mortality, and HF hospitalization. These trends were observed for both CRT‐defibrillation and CRT‐pacing, after adjustment for HF cause and other confounders. Re‐intervention for LV lead displacement or phrenic nerve stimulation was associated with worse outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5721885
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57218852017-12-12 Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Using Quadripolar Versus Non‐Quadripolar Left Ventricular Leads Programmed to Biventricular Pacing With Single‐Site Left Ventricular Pacing: Impact on Survival and Heart Failure Hospitalization Leyva, Francisco Zegard, Abbasin Qiu, Tian Acquaye, Edmund Ferrante, Gaetano Walton, Jamie Marshall, Howard J Am Heart Assoc Original Research BACKGROUND: In cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), quadripolar (QUAD) left ventricular (LV) leads are less prone to postoperative complications than non‐QUAD leads. Some studies have suggested better clinical outcomes. METHODS AND RESULTS: Clinical events were assessed in 847 patients after CRT‐pacing or CRT‐defibrillation using either QUAD (n=287) or non‐QUAD (n=560), programmed to single‐site site LV pacing. Over a follow‐up period of 3.2 years (median [interquartile range, 1.90–5.0]), QUAD was associated with a lower total mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 0.32, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.20–0.52), cardiac mortality (aHR: 0.36, 95% CI, 0.20–0.65), and heart failure (HF) hospitalization (aHR: 0.62, 95% CI, 0.39–0.99), after adjustment for age, sex, New York Heart Association class, HF etiology, device type (CRT‐pacing or CRT‐defibrillation), comorbidities, atrial rhythm, medication, left ventricular ejection fraction, and creatinine. Death from pump failure was lower with QUAD (aHR: 0.33; 95% CI, 0.18–0.62), but no group differences emerged with respect to sudden cardiac death. There were no differences in implant‐related complications. Re‐interventions for LV displacement or phrenic nerve stimulation, which were lower with QUAD, predicted total mortality (aHR: 1.68, 95% CI, 1.11–2.54), cardiac mortality (aHR: 2.61, 95% CI, 1.66–4.11) and HF hospitalization (aHR: 2.09, 95% CI, 1.22–3.58). CONCLUSIONS: CRT using QUAD, programmed to biventricular pacing with single‐site LV pacing, is associated with a lower total mortality, cardiac mortality, and HF hospitalization. These trends were observed for both CRT‐defibrillation and CRT‐pacing, after adjustment for HF cause and other confounders. Re‐intervention for LV lead displacement or phrenic nerve stimulation was associated with worse outcomes. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-10-17 /pmc/articles/PMC5721885/ /pubmed/29042422 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.117.007026 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Research
Leyva, Francisco
Zegard, Abbasin
Qiu, Tian
Acquaye, Edmund
Ferrante, Gaetano
Walton, Jamie
Marshall, Howard
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Using Quadripolar Versus Non‐Quadripolar Left Ventricular Leads Programmed to Biventricular Pacing With Single‐Site Left Ventricular Pacing: Impact on Survival and Heart Failure Hospitalization
title Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Using Quadripolar Versus Non‐Quadripolar Left Ventricular Leads Programmed to Biventricular Pacing With Single‐Site Left Ventricular Pacing: Impact on Survival and Heart Failure Hospitalization
title_full Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Using Quadripolar Versus Non‐Quadripolar Left Ventricular Leads Programmed to Biventricular Pacing With Single‐Site Left Ventricular Pacing: Impact on Survival and Heart Failure Hospitalization
title_fullStr Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Using Quadripolar Versus Non‐Quadripolar Left Ventricular Leads Programmed to Biventricular Pacing With Single‐Site Left Ventricular Pacing: Impact on Survival and Heart Failure Hospitalization
title_full_unstemmed Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Using Quadripolar Versus Non‐Quadripolar Left Ventricular Leads Programmed to Biventricular Pacing With Single‐Site Left Ventricular Pacing: Impact on Survival and Heart Failure Hospitalization
title_short Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Using Quadripolar Versus Non‐Quadripolar Left Ventricular Leads Programmed to Biventricular Pacing With Single‐Site Left Ventricular Pacing: Impact on Survival and Heart Failure Hospitalization
title_sort cardiac resynchronization therapy using quadripolar versus non‐quadripolar left ventricular leads programmed to biventricular pacing with single‐site left ventricular pacing: impact on survival and heart failure hospitalization
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5721885/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29042422
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.117.007026
work_keys_str_mv AT leyvafrancisco cardiacresynchronizationtherapyusingquadripolarversusnonquadripolarleftventricularleadsprogrammedtobiventricularpacingwithsinglesiteleftventricularpacingimpactonsurvivalandheartfailurehospitalization
AT zegardabbasin cardiacresynchronizationtherapyusingquadripolarversusnonquadripolarleftventricularleadsprogrammedtobiventricularpacingwithsinglesiteleftventricularpacingimpactonsurvivalandheartfailurehospitalization
AT qiutian cardiacresynchronizationtherapyusingquadripolarversusnonquadripolarleftventricularleadsprogrammedtobiventricularpacingwithsinglesiteleftventricularpacingimpactonsurvivalandheartfailurehospitalization
AT acquayeedmund cardiacresynchronizationtherapyusingquadripolarversusnonquadripolarleftventricularleadsprogrammedtobiventricularpacingwithsinglesiteleftventricularpacingimpactonsurvivalandheartfailurehospitalization
AT ferrantegaetano cardiacresynchronizationtherapyusingquadripolarversusnonquadripolarleftventricularleadsprogrammedtobiventricularpacingwithsinglesiteleftventricularpacingimpactonsurvivalandheartfailurehospitalization
AT waltonjamie cardiacresynchronizationtherapyusingquadripolarversusnonquadripolarleftventricularleadsprogrammedtobiventricularpacingwithsinglesiteleftventricularpacingimpactonsurvivalandheartfailurehospitalization
AT marshallhoward cardiacresynchronizationtherapyusingquadripolarversusnonquadripolarleftventricularleadsprogrammedtobiventricularpacingwithsinglesiteleftventricularpacingimpactonsurvivalandheartfailurehospitalization