Cargando…

Impact of Sustained Use of a Multifaceted Computerized Quality Improvement Intervention for Cardiovascular Disease Management in Australian Primary Health Care

BACKGROUND: We evaluated a multifaceted, computerized quality improvement intervention for management of cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk in Australian primary health care. After completion of a cluster randomized controlled trial, the intervention was made available to both trial arms. Our objecti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Patel, Bindu, Peiris, David, Usherwood, Tim, Li, Qiang, Harris, Mark, Panaretto, Kathryn, Zwar, Nicholas, Patel, Anushka
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5721891/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29066447
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.117.007093
_version_ 1783284906485350400
author Patel, Bindu
Peiris, David
Usherwood, Tim
Li, Qiang
Harris, Mark
Panaretto, Kathryn
Zwar, Nicholas
Patel, Anushka
author_facet Patel, Bindu
Peiris, David
Usherwood, Tim
Li, Qiang
Harris, Mark
Panaretto, Kathryn
Zwar, Nicholas
Patel, Anushka
author_sort Patel, Bindu
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: We evaluated a multifaceted, computerized quality improvement intervention for management of cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk in Australian primary health care. After completion of a cluster randomized controlled trial, the intervention was made available to both trial arms. Our objective was to assess intervention outcomes in the post‐trial period and any heterogeneity based on original intervention allocation. METHODS AND RESULTS: Data from 41 health services were analyzed. Outcomes were (1) proportion of eligible population with guideline‐recommended CVD risk factor measurements; and (2) the proportion at high CVD risk with current prescriptions for guideline‐recommended medications. Patient‐level analyses were conducted using generalized estimating equations to account for clustering and time effects and tests for heterogeneity were conducted to assess impact of original treatment allocation. Median follow‐up for 22 809 patients (mean age, 64.2 years; 42.5% men, 26.5% high CVD risk) was 17.9 months post‐trial and 35 months since trial inception. At the end of the post‐trial period there was no change in CVD risk factor screening overall when compared with the end of the trial period (64.7% versus 63.5%, P=0.17). For patients at high CVD risk, there were significant improvements in recommended prescriptions at end of the post‐trial period when compared with the end of the trial period (65.2% versus 56.0%, P<0.001). There was no heterogeneity of treatment effects on the outcomes based on original randomization allocation. CONCLUSIONS: CVD risk screening improvements were not observed in the post‐trial period. Conversely, improvements in prescribing continued, suggesting that changes in provider and patient actions may take time when initiating medications. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.anzctr.org.au. Unique identifier: 12611000478910.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5721891
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57218912017-12-12 Impact of Sustained Use of a Multifaceted Computerized Quality Improvement Intervention for Cardiovascular Disease Management in Australian Primary Health Care Patel, Bindu Peiris, David Usherwood, Tim Li, Qiang Harris, Mark Panaretto, Kathryn Zwar, Nicholas Patel, Anushka J Am Heart Assoc Original Research BACKGROUND: We evaluated a multifaceted, computerized quality improvement intervention for management of cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk in Australian primary health care. After completion of a cluster randomized controlled trial, the intervention was made available to both trial arms. Our objective was to assess intervention outcomes in the post‐trial period and any heterogeneity based on original intervention allocation. METHODS AND RESULTS: Data from 41 health services were analyzed. Outcomes were (1) proportion of eligible population with guideline‐recommended CVD risk factor measurements; and (2) the proportion at high CVD risk with current prescriptions for guideline‐recommended medications. Patient‐level analyses were conducted using generalized estimating equations to account for clustering and time effects and tests for heterogeneity were conducted to assess impact of original treatment allocation. Median follow‐up for 22 809 patients (mean age, 64.2 years; 42.5% men, 26.5% high CVD risk) was 17.9 months post‐trial and 35 months since trial inception. At the end of the post‐trial period there was no change in CVD risk factor screening overall when compared with the end of the trial period (64.7% versus 63.5%, P=0.17). For patients at high CVD risk, there were significant improvements in recommended prescriptions at end of the post‐trial period when compared with the end of the trial period (65.2% versus 56.0%, P<0.001). There was no heterogeneity of treatment effects on the outcomes based on original randomization allocation. CONCLUSIONS: CVD risk screening improvements were not observed in the post‐trial period. Conversely, improvements in prescribing continued, suggesting that changes in provider and patient actions may take time when initiating medications. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.anzctr.org.au. Unique identifier: 12611000478910. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-10-24 /pmc/articles/PMC5721891/ /pubmed/29066447 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.117.007093 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Research
Patel, Bindu
Peiris, David
Usherwood, Tim
Li, Qiang
Harris, Mark
Panaretto, Kathryn
Zwar, Nicholas
Patel, Anushka
Impact of Sustained Use of a Multifaceted Computerized Quality Improvement Intervention for Cardiovascular Disease Management in Australian Primary Health Care
title Impact of Sustained Use of a Multifaceted Computerized Quality Improvement Intervention for Cardiovascular Disease Management in Australian Primary Health Care
title_full Impact of Sustained Use of a Multifaceted Computerized Quality Improvement Intervention for Cardiovascular Disease Management in Australian Primary Health Care
title_fullStr Impact of Sustained Use of a Multifaceted Computerized Quality Improvement Intervention for Cardiovascular Disease Management in Australian Primary Health Care
title_full_unstemmed Impact of Sustained Use of a Multifaceted Computerized Quality Improvement Intervention for Cardiovascular Disease Management in Australian Primary Health Care
title_short Impact of Sustained Use of a Multifaceted Computerized Quality Improvement Intervention for Cardiovascular Disease Management in Australian Primary Health Care
title_sort impact of sustained use of a multifaceted computerized quality improvement intervention for cardiovascular disease management in australian primary health care
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5721891/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29066447
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.117.007093
work_keys_str_mv AT patelbindu impactofsustaineduseofamultifacetedcomputerizedqualityimprovementinterventionforcardiovasculardiseasemanagementinaustralianprimaryhealthcare
AT peirisdavid impactofsustaineduseofamultifacetedcomputerizedqualityimprovementinterventionforcardiovasculardiseasemanagementinaustralianprimaryhealthcare
AT usherwoodtim impactofsustaineduseofamultifacetedcomputerizedqualityimprovementinterventionforcardiovasculardiseasemanagementinaustralianprimaryhealthcare
AT liqiang impactofsustaineduseofamultifacetedcomputerizedqualityimprovementinterventionforcardiovasculardiseasemanagementinaustralianprimaryhealthcare
AT harrismark impactofsustaineduseofamultifacetedcomputerizedqualityimprovementinterventionforcardiovasculardiseasemanagementinaustralianprimaryhealthcare
AT panarettokathryn impactofsustaineduseofamultifacetedcomputerizedqualityimprovementinterventionforcardiovasculardiseasemanagementinaustralianprimaryhealthcare
AT zwarnicholas impactofsustaineduseofamultifacetedcomputerizedqualityimprovementinterventionforcardiovasculardiseasemanagementinaustralianprimaryhealthcare
AT patelanushka impactofsustaineduseofamultifacetedcomputerizedqualityimprovementinterventionforcardiovasculardiseasemanagementinaustralianprimaryhealthcare