Cargando…
The protective effectiveness of control interventions for malaria prevention: a systematic review of the literature
Background: Thanks to a considerable increase in funding, malaria control interventions (MCI) whose efficacy had been demonstrated by controlled trials have been largely scaled up during the last decade. Nevertheless, it was not systematically investigated whether this efficacy had been preserved on...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
F1000 Research Limited
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5721947/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29259767 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.12952.1 |
_version_ | 1783284917392637952 |
---|---|
author | Kesteman, Thomas Randrianarivelojosia, Milijaona Rogier, Christophe |
author_facet | Kesteman, Thomas Randrianarivelojosia, Milijaona Rogier, Christophe |
author_sort | Kesteman, Thomas |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: Thanks to a considerable increase in funding, malaria control interventions (MCI) whose efficacy had been demonstrated by controlled trials have been largely scaled up during the last decade. Nevertheless, it was not systematically investigated whether this efficacy had been preserved once deployed on the field. Therefore, we sought the literature to assess the disparities between efficacy and effectiveness and the effort to measure the protective effectiveness (PE) of MCI. Methods: The PubMed database was searched for references with keywords related to malaria, to control interventions for prevention and to study designs that allow for the measure of the PE against parasitemia or against clinical outcomes. Results: Our search retrieved 1423 references, and 162 articles were included in the review. Publications were scarce before the year 2000 but dramatically increased afterwards. Bed nets was the MCI most studied (82.1%). The study design most used was a cross-sectional study (65.4%). Two thirds (67.3%) were conducted at the district level or below, and the majority (56.8%) included only children even if the MCI didn’t target only children. Not all studies demonstrated a significant PE from exposure to MCI: 60.6% of studies evaluating bed nets, 50.0% of those evaluating indoor residual spraying, and 4/8 showed an added PE of using both interventions as compared with one only; this proportion was 62.5% for intermittent preventive treatment of pregnant women, and 20.0% for domestic use of insecticides. Conclusions: This review identified numerous local findings of low, non-significant PE –or even the absence of a protective effect provided by these MCIs. The identification of such failures in the effectiveness of MCIs advocates for the investigation of the causes of the problem found. Ideal evaluations of the PE of MCIs should incorporate both a large representativeness and an evaluation of the PE stratified by subpopulations. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5721947 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | F1000 Research Limited |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57219472017-12-18 The protective effectiveness of control interventions for malaria prevention: a systematic review of the literature Kesteman, Thomas Randrianarivelojosia, Milijaona Rogier, Christophe F1000Res Systematic Review Background: Thanks to a considerable increase in funding, malaria control interventions (MCI) whose efficacy had been demonstrated by controlled trials have been largely scaled up during the last decade. Nevertheless, it was not systematically investigated whether this efficacy had been preserved once deployed on the field. Therefore, we sought the literature to assess the disparities between efficacy and effectiveness and the effort to measure the protective effectiveness (PE) of MCI. Methods: The PubMed database was searched for references with keywords related to malaria, to control interventions for prevention and to study designs that allow for the measure of the PE against parasitemia or against clinical outcomes. Results: Our search retrieved 1423 references, and 162 articles were included in the review. Publications were scarce before the year 2000 but dramatically increased afterwards. Bed nets was the MCI most studied (82.1%). The study design most used was a cross-sectional study (65.4%). Two thirds (67.3%) were conducted at the district level or below, and the majority (56.8%) included only children even if the MCI didn’t target only children. Not all studies demonstrated a significant PE from exposure to MCI: 60.6% of studies evaluating bed nets, 50.0% of those evaluating indoor residual spraying, and 4/8 showed an added PE of using both interventions as compared with one only; this proportion was 62.5% for intermittent preventive treatment of pregnant women, and 20.0% for domestic use of insecticides. Conclusions: This review identified numerous local findings of low, non-significant PE –or even the absence of a protective effect provided by these MCIs. The identification of such failures in the effectiveness of MCIs advocates for the investigation of the causes of the problem found. Ideal evaluations of the PE of MCIs should incorporate both a large representativeness and an evaluation of the PE stratified by subpopulations. F1000 Research Limited 2017-11-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5721947/ /pubmed/29259767 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.12952.1 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Kesteman T et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Systematic Review Kesteman, Thomas Randrianarivelojosia, Milijaona Rogier, Christophe The protective effectiveness of control interventions for malaria prevention: a systematic review of the literature |
title | The protective effectiveness of control interventions for malaria prevention: a systematic review of the literature |
title_full | The protective effectiveness of control interventions for malaria prevention: a systematic review of the literature |
title_fullStr | The protective effectiveness of control interventions for malaria prevention: a systematic review of the literature |
title_full_unstemmed | The protective effectiveness of control interventions for malaria prevention: a systematic review of the literature |
title_short | The protective effectiveness of control interventions for malaria prevention: a systematic review of the literature |
title_sort | protective effectiveness of control interventions for malaria prevention: a systematic review of the literature |
topic | Systematic Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5721947/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29259767 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.12952.1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kestemanthomas theprotectiveeffectivenessofcontrolinterventionsformalariapreventionasystematicreviewoftheliterature AT randrianarivelojosiamilijaona theprotectiveeffectivenessofcontrolinterventionsformalariapreventionasystematicreviewoftheliterature AT rogierchristophe theprotectiveeffectivenessofcontrolinterventionsformalariapreventionasystematicreviewoftheliterature AT kestemanthomas protectiveeffectivenessofcontrolinterventionsformalariapreventionasystematicreviewoftheliterature AT randrianarivelojosiamilijaona protectiveeffectivenessofcontrolinterventionsformalariapreventionasystematicreviewoftheliterature AT rogierchristophe protectiveeffectivenessofcontrolinterventionsformalariapreventionasystematicreviewoftheliterature |