Cargando…

The protective effectiveness of control interventions for malaria prevention: a systematic review of the literature

Background: Thanks to a considerable increase in funding, malaria control interventions (MCI) whose efficacy had been demonstrated by controlled trials have been largely scaled up during the last decade. Nevertheless, it was not systematically investigated whether this efficacy had been preserved on...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kesteman, Thomas, Randrianarivelojosia, Milijaona, Rogier, Christophe
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: F1000 Research Limited 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5721947/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29259767
http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.12952.1
_version_ 1783284917392637952
author Kesteman, Thomas
Randrianarivelojosia, Milijaona
Rogier, Christophe
author_facet Kesteman, Thomas
Randrianarivelojosia, Milijaona
Rogier, Christophe
author_sort Kesteman, Thomas
collection PubMed
description Background: Thanks to a considerable increase in funding, malaria control interventions (MCI) whose efficacy had been demonstrated by controlled trials have been largely scaled up during the last decade. Nevertheless, it was not systematically investigated whether this efficacy had been preserved once deployed on the field. Therefore, we sought the literature to assess the disparities between efficacy and effectiveness and the effort to measure the protective effectiveness (PE) of MCI. Methods: The PubMed database was searched for references with keywords related to malaria, to control interventions for prevention and to study designs that allow for the measure of the PE against parasitemia or against clinical outcomes. Results: Our search retrieved 1423 references, and 162 articles were included in the review. Publications were scarce before the year 2000 but dramatically increased afterwards. Bed nets was the MCI most studied (82.1%). The study design most used was a cross-sectional study (65.4%). Two thirds (67.3%) were conducted at the district level or below, and the majority (56.8%) included only children even if the MCI didn’t target only children. Not all studies demonstrated a significant PE from exposure to MCI: 60.6% of studies evaluating bed nets, 50.0% of those evaluating indoor residual spraying, and 4/8 showed an added PE of using both interventions as compared with one only; this proportion was 62.5% for intermittent preventive treatment of pregnant women, and 20.0% for domestic use of insecticides. Conclusions: This review identified numerous local findings of low, non-significant PE –or even the absence of a protective effect provided by these MCIs. The identification of such failures in the effectiveness of MCIs advocates for the investigation of the causes of the problem found. Ideal evaluations of the PE of MCIs should incorporate both a large representativeness and an evaluation of the PE stratified by subpopulations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5721947
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher F1000 Research Limited
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57219472017-12-18 The protective effectiveness of control interventions for malaria prevention: a systematic review of the literature Kesteman, Thomas Randrianarivelojosia, Milijaona Rogier, Christophe F1000Res Systematic Review Background: Thanks to a considerable increase in funding, malaria control interventions (MCI) whose efficacy had been demonstrated by controlled trials have been largely scaled up during the last decade. Nevertheless, it was not systematically investigated whether this efficacy had been preserved once deployed on the field. Therefore, we sought the literature to assess the disparities between efficacy and effectiveness and the effort to measure the protective effectiveness (PE) of MCI. Methods: The PubMed database was searched for references with keywords related to malaria, to control interventions for prevention and to study designs that allow for the measure of the PE against parasitemia or against clinical outcomes. Results: Our search retrieved 1423 references, and 162 articles were included in the review. Publications were scarce before the year 2000 but dramatically increased afterwards. Bed nets was the MCI most studied (82.1%). The study design most used was a cross-sectional study (65.4%). Two thirds (67.3%) were conducted at the district level or below, and the majority (56.8%) included only children even if the MCI didn’t target only children. Not all studies demonstrated a significant PE from exposure to MCI: 60.6% of studies evaluating bed nets, 50.0% of those evaluating indoor residual spraying, and 4/8 showed an added PE of using both interventions as compared with one only; this proportion was 62.5% for intermittent preventive treatment of pregnant women, and 20.0% for domestic use of insecticides. Conclusions: This review identified numerous local findings of low, non-significant PE –or even the absence of a protective effect provided by these MCIs. The identification of such failures in the effectiveness of MCIs advocates for the investigation of the causes of the problem found. Ideal evaluations of the PE of MCIs should incorporate both a large representativeness and an evaluation of the PE stratified by subpopulations. F1000 Research Limited 2017-11-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5721947/ /pubmed/29259767 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.12952.1 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Kesteman T et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Kesteman, Thomas
Randrianarivelojosia, Milijaona
Rogier, Christophe
The protective effectiveness of control interventions for malaria prevention: a systematic review of the literature
title The protective effectiveness of control interventions for malaria prevention: a systematic review of the literature
title_full The protective effectiveness of control interventions for malaria prevention: a systematic review of the literature
title_fullStr The protective effectiveness of control interventions for malaria prevention: a systematic review of the literature
title_full_unstemmed The protective effectiveness of control interventions for malaria prevention: a systematic review of the literature
title_short The protective effectiveness of control interventions for malaria prevention: a systematic review of the literature
title_sort protective effectiveness of control interventions for malaria prevention: a systematic review of the literature
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5721947/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29259767
http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.12952.1
work_keys_str_mv AT kestemanthomas theprotectiveeffectivenessofcontrolinterventionsformalariapreventionasystematicreviewoftheliterature
AT randrianarivelojosiamilijaona theprotectiveeffectivenessofcontrolinterventionsformalariapreventionasystematicreviewoftheliterature
AT rogierchristophe theprotectiveeffectivenessofcontrolinterventionsformalariapreventionasystematicreviewoftheliterature
AT kestemanthomas protectiveeffectivenessofcontrolinterventionsformalariapreventionasystematicreviewoftheliterature
AT randrianarivelojosiamilijaona protectiveeffectivenessofcontrolinterventionsformalariapreventionasystematicreviewoftheliterature
AT rogierchristophe protectiveeffectivenessofcontrolinterventionsformalariapreventionasystematicreviewoftheliterature