Cargando…
Influences on rebubble rate in Descemet’s membrane endothelial keratoplasty
PURPOSE: Descemet’s membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) is a minimally invasive partial corneal transplant procedure used in patients with failing endothelial membranes. This study aims to identify those factors which influence the need for a rebubble of the corneal graft. METHODS: A total of 9...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5722014/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29255344 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S147217 |
_version_ | 1783284929537245184 |
---|---|
author | Mechels, Keegan B Greenwood, Michael D Sudhagoni, Ramu G Berdahl, John P |
author_facet | Mechels, Keegan B Greenwood, Michael D Sudhagoni, Ramu G Berdahl, John P |
author_sort | Mechels, Keegan B |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Descemet’s membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) is a minimally invasive partial corneal transplant procedure used in patients with failing endothelial membranes. This study aims to identify those factors which influence the need for a rebubble of the corneal graft. METHODS: A total of 94 eyes that received DMEK between March 2014 and January 2016 at Vance Thompson Vision were used in the study. Demographic and graft data were collected from the patients and donors, and perioperative statistics of the procedures. A logistical regression was used to compare eyes that did and did not require a rebubble. RESULTS: Among those characteristics that were included (patient age/sex, donor age/sex, death to processing time, donation to surgery time, death to procurement time, specular cell count density, burping procedure, postoperative day 1 intraocular pressure [IOP], and postoperative week 1 IOP, concurrent phacoemulsification, and how well the Descemet graft was centered), only a lower specular cell count density of the corneal graft, and a graft that was not well-centered correlated with needing a rebubble due to partial graft detachment (p=0.021) and (p=0.023), respectively. CONCLUSION: An increased specular cell count density may allow for better placement of the corneal graft by allowing for better unfolding in DMEK procedures. A well-centered graft may decrease postoperative complications by increasing adherence. Additionally, postoperative management of IOP may not affect the rebubble rate, and therefore should be left to the discretion of the provider to determine whether it is necessary. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5722014 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Dove Medical Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57220142017-12-18 Influences on rebubble rate in Descemet’s membrane endothelial keratoplasty Mechels, Keegan B Greenwood, Michael D Sudhagoni, Ramu G Berdahl, John P Clin Ophthalmol Original Research PURPOSE: Descemet’s membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) is a minimally invasive partial corneal transplant procedure used in patients with failing endothelial membranes. This study aims to identify those factors which influence the need for a rebubble of the corneal graft. METHODS: A total of 94 eyes that received DMEK between March 2014 and January 2016 at Vance Thompson Vision were used in the study. Demographic and graft data were collected from the patients and donors, and perioperative statistics of the procedures. A logistical regression was used to compare eyes that did and did not require a rebubble. RESULTS: Among those characteristics that were included (patient age/sex, donor age/sex, death to processing time, donation to surgery time, death to procurement time, specular cell count density, burping procedure, postoperative day 1 intraocular pressure [IOP], and postoperative week 1 IOP, concurrent phacoemulsification, and how well the Descemet graft was centered), only a lower specular cell count density of the corneal graft, and a graft that was not well-centered correlated with needing a rebubble due to partial graft detachment (p=0.021) and (p=0.023), respectively. CONCLUSION: An increased specular cell count density may allow for better placement of the corneal graft by allowing for better unfolding in DMEK procedures. A well-centered graft may decrease postoperative complications by increasing adherence. Additionally, postoperative management of IOP may not affect the rebubble rate, and therefore should be left to the discretion of the provider to determine whether it is necessary. Dove Medical Press 2017-12-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5722014/ /pubmed/29255344 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S147217 Text en © 2017 Mechels et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Mechels, Keegan B Greenwood, Michael D Sudhagoni, Ramu G Berdahl, John P Influences on rebubble rate in Descemet’s membrane endothelial keratoplasty |
title | Influences on rebubble rate in Descemet’s membrane endothelial keratoplasty |
title_full | Influences on rebubble rate in Descemet’s membrane endothelial keratoplasty |
title_fullStr | Influences on rebubble rate in Descemet’s membrane endothelial keratoplasty |
title_full_unstemmed | Influences on rebubble rate in Descemet’s membrane endothelial keratoplasty |
title_short | Influences on rebubble rate in Descemet’s membrane endothelial keratoplasty |
title_sort | influences on rebubble rate in descemet’s membrane endothelial keratoplasty |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5722014/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29255344 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S147217 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mechelskeeganb influencesonrebubblerateindescemetsmembraneendothelialkeratoplasty AT greenwoodmichaeld influencesonrebubblerateindescemetsmembraneendothelialkeratoplasty AT sudhagoniramug influencesonrebubblerateindescemetsmembraneendothelialkeratoplasty AT berdahljohnp influencesonrebubblerateindescemetsmembraneendothelialkeratoplasty |