Cargando…

Influences on rebubble rate in Descemet’s membrane endothelial keratoplasty

PURPOSE: Descemet’s membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) is a minimally invasive partial corneal transplant procedure used in patients with failing endothelial membranes. This study aims to identify those factors which influence the need for a rebubble of the corneal graft. METHODS: A total of 9...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mechels, Keegan B, Greenwood, Michael D, Sudhagoni, Ramu G, Berdahl, John P
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5722014/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29255344
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S147217
_version_ 1783284929537245184
author Mechels, Keegan B
Greenwood, Michael D
Sudhagoni, Ramu G
Berdahl, John P
author_facet Mechels, Keegan B
Greenwood, Michael D
Sudhagoni, Ramu G
Berdahl, John P
author_sort Mechels, Keegan B
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Descemet’s membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) is a minimally invasive partial corneal transplant procedure used in patients with failing endothelial membranes. This study aims to identify those factors which influence the need for a rebubble of the corneal graft. METHODS: A total of 94 eyes that received DMEK between March 2014 and January 2016 at Vance Thompson Vision were used in the study. Demographic and graft data were collected from the patients and donors, and perioperative statistics of the procedures. A logistical regression was used to compare eyes that did and did not require a rebubble. RESULTS: Among those characteristics that were included (patient age/sex, donor age/sex, death to processing time, donation to surgery time, death to procurement time, specular cell count density, burping procedure, postoperative day 1 intraocular pressure [IOP], and postoperative week 1 IOP, concurrent phacoemulsification, and how well the Descemet graft was centered), only a lower specular cell count density of the corneal graft, and a graft that was not well-centered correlated with needing a rebubble due to partial graft detachment (p=0.021) and (p=0.023), respectively. CONCLUSION: An increased specular cell count density may allow for better placement of the corneal graft by allowing for better unfolding in DMEK procedures. A well-centered graft may decrease postoperative complications by increasing adherence. Additionally, postoperative management of IOP may not affect the rebubble rate, and therefore should be left to the discretion of the provider to determine whether it is necessary.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5722014
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57220142017-12-18 Influences on rebubble rate in Descemet’s membrane endothelial keratoplasty Mechels, Keegan B Greenwood, Michael D Sudhagoni, Ramu G Berdahl, John P Clin Ophthalmol Original Research PURPOSE: Descemet’s membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) is a minimally invasive partial corneal transplant procedure used in patients with failing endothelial membranes. This study aims to identify those factors which influence the need for a rebubble of the corneal graft. METHODS: A total of 94 eyes that received DMEK between March 2014 and January 2016 at Vance Thompson Vision were used in the study. Demographic and graft data were collected from the patients and donors, and perioperative statistics of the procedures. A logistical regression was used to compare eyes that did and did not require a rebubble. RESULTS: Among those characteristics that were included (patient age/sex, donor age/sex, death to processing time, donation to surgery time, death to procurement time, specular cell count density, burping procedure, postoperative day 1 intraocular pressure [IOP], and postoperative week 1 IOP, concurrent phacoemulsification, and how well the Descemet graft was centered), only a lower specular cell count density of the corneal graft, and a graft that was not well-centered correlated with needing a rebubble due to partial graft detachment (p=0.021) and (p=0.023), respectively. CONCLUSION: An increased specular cell count density may allow for better placement of the corneal graft by allowing for better unfolding in DMEK procedures. A well-centered graft may decrease postoperative complications by increasing adherence. Additionally, postoperative management of IOP may not affect the rebubble rate, and therefore should be left to the discretion of the provider to determine whether it is necessary. Dove Medical Press 2017-12-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5722014/ /pubmed/29255344 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S147217 Text en © 2017 Mechels et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Mechels, Keegan B
Greenwood, Michael D
Sudhagoni, Ramu G
Berdahl, John P
Influences on rebubble rate in Descemet’s membrane endothelial keratoplasty
title Influences on rebubble rate in Descemet’s membrane endothelial keratoplasty
title_full Influences on rebubble rate in Descemet’s membrane endothelial keratoplasty
title_fullStr Influences on rebubble rate in Descemet’s membrane endothelial keratoplasty
title_full_unstemmed Influences on rebubble rate in Descemet’s membrane endothelial keratoplasty
title_short Influences on rebubble rate in Descemet’s membrane endothelial keratoplasty
title_sort influences on rebubble rate in descemet’s membrane endothelial keratoplasty
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5722014/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29255344
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S147217
work_keys_str_mv AT mechelskeeganb influencesonrebubblerateindescemetsmembraneendothelialkeratoplasty
AT greenwoodmichaeld influencesonrebubblerateindescemetsmembraneendothelialkeratoplasty
AT sudhagoniramug influencesonrebubblerateindescemetsmembraneendothelialkeratoplasty
AT berdahljohnp influencesonrebubblerateindescemetsmembraneendothelialkeratoplasty