Cargando…
Two-sample Mendelian randomization: avoiding the downsides of a powerful, widely applicable but potentially fallible technique
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5722032/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28338968 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyx028 |
_version_ | 1783284930938142720 |
---|---|
author | Hartwig, Fernando Pires Davies, Neil Martin Hemani, Gibran Davey Smith, George |
author_facet | Hartwig, Fernando Pires Davies, Neil Martin Hemani, Gibran Davey Smith, George |
author_sort | Hartwig, Fernando Pires |
collection | PubMed |
description | |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5722032 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57220322017-12-15 Two-sample Mendelian randomization: avoiding the downsides of a powerful, widely applicable but potentially fallible technique Hartwig, Fernando Pires Davies, Neil Martin Hemani, Gibran Davey Smith, George Int J Epidemiol Editorials Oxford University Press 2016-12 2017-03-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5722032/ /pubmed/28338968 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyx028 Text en © The Author 2017; Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Epidemiological Association http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Editorials Hartwig, Fernando Pires Davies, Neil Martin Hemani, Gibran Davey Smith, George Two-sample Mendelian randomization: avoiding the downsides of a powerful, widely applicable but potentially fallible technique |
title | Two-sample Mendelian randomization: avoiding the downsides of a powerful, widely applicable but potentially fallible technique |
title_full | Two-sample Mendelian randomization: avoiding the downsides of a powerful, widely applicable but potentially fallible technique |
title_fullStr | Two-sample Mendelian randomization: avoiding the downsides of a powerful, widely applicable but potentially fallible technique |
title_full_unstemmed | Two-sample Mendelian randomization: avoiding the downsides of a powerful, widely applicable but potentially fallible technique |
title_short | Two-sample Mendelian randomization: avoiding the downsides of a powerful, widely applicable but potentially fallible technique |
title_sort | two-sample mendelian randomization: avoiding the downsides of a powerful, widely applicable but potentially fallible technique |
topic | Editorials |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5722032/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28338968 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyx028 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hartwigfernandopires twosamplemendelianrandomizationavoidingthedownsidesofapowerfulwidelyapplicablebutpotentiallyfallibletechnique AT daviesneilmartin twosamplemendelianrandomizationavoidingthedownsidesofapowerfulwidelyapplicablebutpotentiallyfallibletechnique AT hemanigibran twosamplemendelianrandomizationavoidingthedownsidesofapowerfulwidelyapplicablebutpotentiallyfallibletechnique AT daveysmithgeorge twosamplemendelianrandomizationavoidingthedownsidesofapowerfulwidelyapplicablebutpotentiallyfallibletechnique |