Cargando…
Does Red Cell Distribution Width Predict Outcome in Traumatic Brain Injury: Comparison to Corticosteroid Randomization After Significant Head Injury
BACKGROUND: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a leading cause of death and disability. The role of red cell distribution width (RDW) as a prognostic biomarker for outcome in TBI patients is unknown. Based on the corticosteroid randomization after significant head injury (CRASH) trial database, a progn...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elmer Press
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5722039/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29238428 http://dx.doi.org/10.14740/jocmr3173w |
_version_ | 1783284931650125824 |
---|---|
author | Sadaka, Farid Doctors, Nicholas Pearson, Tallia Snyders, Brian O’Brien, Jacklyn |
author_facet | Sadaka, Farid Doctors, Nicholas Pearson, Tallia Snyders, Brian O’Brien, Jacklyn |
author_sort | Sadaka, Farid |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a leading cause of death and disability. The role of red cell distribution width (RDW) as a prognostic biomarker for outcome in TBI patients is unknown. Based on the corticosteroid randomization after significant head injury (CRASH) trial database, a prognosis calculator (CRASH) has been developed for outcome prediction in TBI. The objectives of this study are to investigate the association between RDW on day 1 of TBI and outcome, and to compare outcome prediction from RDW to that from CRASH. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of patients with TBI and a Glasgow coma scale (GCS) score of 14 or less. Day 1 RDW and CRASH data were extracted. CRASH was calculated for each patient. Outcome was defined as mortality at 14 days and GOS at 6 months, with poor outcome defined as GOS of 1 - 3. Patients were stratified according to RDW values into six groups, and according to CRASH values into six groups. RESULTS: A total of 416 patients with TBI were included, with 339 survivors (S) and 77 non-survivors (NS). Compared to survivors, non-survivors were of similar age in years (58 ± 23 vs. 58 ± 23, P = 1.0), had lower GCS scores (5 ± 3 vs. 12 ± 3, P = 0.0001), similar RDW (14.0 ± 1.2 vs. 13.9 ± 1.5, P = 0.6), and higher CRASH values (68 ± 26 vs. 24 ± 22, P = 0.0001). Estimating the receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) area under the curve (AUC) showed that CRASH was a significantly better predictor of mortality compared to RDW (AUC = 0.91 ± 0.01 for CRASH compared to 0.66 ± 0.03 for RDW; P < 0.0001). In addition, CRASH was a better predictor of neurologic outcome compared to RDW (AUC = 0.85 ± 0.02 for CRASH compared to 0.76 ± 0.03 for RDW; P = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: CRASH calculator was a strong predictor of mortality in patients with TBI. RDW on day 1 did not differ between survivors and non-survivors, and was a poor predictor of mortality. Both RDW on day 1 and CRASH calculator are good predictors of 6-month outcome in TBI patients, although CRASH calculator remains a better predictor. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5722039 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Elmer Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57220392017-12-13 Does Red Cell Distribution Width Predict Outcome in Traumatic Brain Injury: Comparison to Corticosteroid Randomization After Significant Head Injury Sadaka, Farid Doctors, Nicholas Pearson, Tallia Snyders, Brian O’Brien, Jacklyn J Clin Med Res Original Article BACKGROUND: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a leading cause of death and disability. The role of red cell distribution width (RDW) as a prognostic biomarker for outcome in TBI patients is unknown. Based on the corticosteroid randomization after significant head injury (CRASH) trial database, a prognosis calculator (CRASH) has been developed for outcome prediction in TBI. The objectives of this study are to investigate the association between RDW on day 1 of TBI and outcome, and to compare outcome prediction from RDW to that from CRASH. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of patients with TBI and a Glasgow coma scale (GCS) score of 14 or less. Day 1 RDW and CRASH data were extracted. CRASH was calculated for each patient. Outcome was defined as mortality at 14 days and GOS at 6 months, with poor outcome defined as GOS of 1 - 3. Patients were stratified according to RDW values into six groups, and according to CRASH values into six groups. RESULTS: A total of 416 patients with TBI were included, with 339 survivors (S) and 77 non-survivors (NS). Compared to survivors, non-survivors were of similar age in years (58 ± 23 vs. 58 ± 23, P = 1.0), had lower GCS scores (5 ± 3 vs. 12 ± 3, P = 0.0001), similar RDW (14.0 ± 1.2 vs. 13.9 ± 1.5, P = 0.6), and higher CRASH values (68 ± 26 vs. 24 ± 22, P = 0.0001). Estimating the receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) area under the curve (AUC) showed that CRASH was a significantly better predictor of mortality compared to RDW (AUC = 0.91 ± 0.01 for CRASH compared to 0.66 ± 0.03 for RDW; P < 0.0001). In addition, CRASH was a better predictor of neurologic outcome compared to RDW (AUC = 0.85 ± 0.02 for CRASH compared to 0.76 ± 0.03 for RDW; P = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: CRASH calculator was a strong predictor of mortality in patients with TBI. RDW on day 1 did not differ between survivors and non-survivors, and was a poor predictor of mortality. Both RDW on day 1 and CRASH calculator are good predictors of 6-month outcome in TBI patients, although CRASH calculator remains a better predictor. Elmer Press 2018-01 2017-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5722039/ /pubmed/29238428 http://dx.doi.org/10.14740/jocmr3173w Text en Copyright 2018, Sadaka et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Sadaka, Farid Doctors, Nicholas Pearson, Tallia Snyders, Brian O’Brien, Jacklyn Does Red Cell Distribution Width Predict Outcome in Traumatic Brain Injury: Comparison to Corticosteroid Randomization After Significant Head Injury |
title | Does Red Cell Distribution Width Predict Outcome in Traumatic Brain Injury: Comparison to Corticosteroid Randomization After Significant Head Injury |
title_full | Does Red Cell Distribution Width Predict Outcome in Traumatic Brain Injury: Comparison to Corticosteroid Randomization After Significant Head Injury |
title_fullStr | Does Red Cell Distribution Width Predict Outcome in Traumatic Brain Injury: Comparison to Corticosteroid Randomization After Significant Head Injury |
title_full_unstemmed | Does Red Cell Distribution Width Predict Outcome in Traumatic Brain Injury: Comparison to Corticosteroid Randomization After Significant Head Injury |
title_short | Does Red Cell Distribution Width Predict Outcome in Traumatic Brain Injury: Comparison to Corticosteroid Randomization After Significant Head Injury |
title_sort | does red cell distribution width predict outcome in traumatic brain injury: comparison to corticosteroid randomization after significant head injury |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5722039/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29238428 http://dx.doi.org/10.14740/jocmr3173w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sadakafarid doesredcelldistributionwidthpredictoutcomeintraumaticbraininjurycomparisontocorticosteroidrandomizationaftersignificantheadinjury AT doctorsnicholas doesredcelldistributionwidthpredictoutcomeintraumaticbraininjurycomparisontocorticosteroidrandomizationaftersignificantheadinjury AT pearsontallia doesredcelldistributionwidthpredictoutcomeintraumaticbraininjurycomparisontocorticosteroidrandomizationaftersignificantheadinjury AT snydersbrian doesredcelldistributionwidthpredictoutcomeintraumaticbraininjurycomparisontocorticosteroidrandomizationaftersignificantheadinjury AT obrienjacklyn doesredcelldistributionwidthpredictoutcomeintraumaticbraininjurycomparisontocorticosteroidrandomizationaftersignificantheadinjury |