Cargando…

Does Red Cell Distribution Width Predict Outcome in Traumatic Brain Injury: Comparison to Corticosteroid Randomization After Significant Head Injury

BACKGROUND: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a leading cause of death and disability. The role of red cell distribution width (RDW) as a prognostic biomarker for outcome in TBI patients is unknown. Based on the corticosteroid randomization after significant head injury (CRASH) trial database, a progn...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sadaka, Farid, Doctors, Nicholas, Pearson, Tallia, Snyders, Brian, O’Brien, Jacklyn
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elmer Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5722039/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29238428
http://dx.doi.org/10.14740/jocmr3173w
_version_ 1783284931650125824
author Sadaka, Farid
Doctors, Nicholas
Pearson, Tallia
Snyders, Brian
O’Brien, Jacklyn
author_facet Sadaka, Farid
Doctors, Nicholas
Pearson, Tallia
Snyders, Brian
O’Brien, Jacklyn
author_sort Sadaka, Farid
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a leading cause of death and disability. The role of red cell distribution width (RDW) as a prognostic biomarker for outcome in TBI patients is unknown. Based on the corticosteroid randomization after significant head injury (CRASH) trial database, a prognosis calculator (CRASH) has been developed for outcome prediction in TBI. The objectives of this study are to investigate the association between RDW on day 1 of TBI and outcome, and to compare outcome prediction from RDW to that from CRASH. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of patients with TBI and a Glasgow coma scale (GCS) score of 14 or less. Day 1 RDW and CRASH data were extracted. CRASH was calculated for each patient. Outcome was defined as mortality at 14 days and GOS at 6 months, with poor outcome defined as GOS of 1 - 3. Patients were stratified according to RDW values into six groups, and according to CRASH values into six groups. RESULTS: A total of 416 patients with TBI were included, with 339 survivors (S) and 77 non-survivors (NS). Compared to survivors, non-survivors were of similar age in years (58 ± 23 vs. 58 ± 23, P = 1.0), had lower GCS scores (5 ± 3 vs. 12 ± 3, P = 0.0001), similar RDW (14.0 ± 1.2 vs. 13.9 ± 1.5, P = 0.6), and higher CRASH values (68 ± 26 vs. 24 ± 22, P = 0.0001). Estimating the receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) area under the curve (AUC) showed that CRASH was a significantly better predictor of mortality compared to RDW (AUC = 0.91 ± 0.01 for CRASH compared to 0.66 ± 0.03 for RDW; P < 0.0001). In addition, CRASH was a better predictor of neurologic outcome compared to RDW (AUC = 0.85 ± 0.02 for CRASH compared to 0.76 ± 0.03 for RDW; P = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: CRASH calculator was a strong predictor of mortality in patients with TBI. RDW on day 1 did not differ between survivors and non-survivors, and was a poor predictor of mortality. Both RDW on day 1 and CRASH calculator are good predictors of 6-month outcome in TBI patients, although CRASH calculator remains a better predictor.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5722039
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Elmer Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57220392017-12-13 Does Red Cell Distribution Width Predict Outcome in Traumatic Brain Injury: Comparison to Corticosteroid Randomization After Significant Head Injury Sadaka, Farid Doctors, Nicholas Pearson, Tallia Snyders, Brian O’Brien, Jacklyn J Clin Med Res Original Article BACKGROUND: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a leading cause of death and disability. The role of red cell distribution width (RDW) as a prognostic biomarker for outcome in TBI patients is unknown. Based on the corticosteroid randomization after significant head injury (CRASH) trial database, a prognosis calculator (CRASH) has been developed for outcome prediction in TBI. The objectives of this study are to investigate the association between RDW on day 1 of TBI and outcome, and to compare outcome prediction from RDW to that from CRASH. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of patients with TBI and a Glasgow coma scale (GCS) score of 14 or less. Day 1 RDW and CRASH data were extracted. CRASH was calculated for each patient. Outcome was defined as mortality at 14 days and GOS at 6 months, with poor outcome defined as GOS of 1 - 3. Patients were stratified according to RDW values into six groups, and according to CRASH values into six groups. RESULTS: A total of 416 patients with TBI were included, with 339 survivors (S) and 77 non-survivors (NS). Compared to survivors, non-survivors were of similar age in years (58 ± 23 vs. 58 ± 23, P = 1.0), had lower GCS scores (5 ± 3 vs. 12 ± 3, P = 0.0001), similar RDW (14.0 ± 1.2 vs. 13.9 ± 1.5, P = 0.6), and higher CRASH values (68 ± 26 vs. 24 ± 22, P = 0.0001). Estimating the receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) area under the curve (AUC) showed that CRASH was a significantly better predictor of mortality compared to RDW (AUC = 0.91 ± 0.01 for CRASH compared to 0.66 ± 0.03 for RDW; P < 0.0001). In addition, CRASH was a better predictor of neurologic outcome compared to RDW (AUC = 0.85 ± 0.02 for CRASH compared to 0.76 ± 0.03 for RDW; P = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: CRASH calculator was a strong predictor of mortality in patients with TBI. RDW on day 1 did not differ between survivors and non-survivors, and was a poor predictor of mortality. Both RDW on day 1 and CRASH calculator are good predictors of 6-month outcome in TBI patients, although CRASH calculator remains a better predictor. Elmer Press 2018-01 2017-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5722039/ /pubmed/29238428 http://dx.doi.org/10.14740/jocmr3173w Text en Copyright 2018, Sadaka et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Sadaka, Farid
Doctors, Nicholas
Pearson, Tallia
Snyders, Brian
O’Brien, Jacklyn
Does Red Cell Distribution Width Predict Outcome in Traumatic Brain Injury: Comparison to Corticosteroid Randomization After Significant Head Injury
title Does Red Cell Distribution Width Predict Outcome in Traumatic Brain Injury: Comparison to Corticosteroid Randomization After Significant Head Injury
title_full Does Red Cell Distribution Width Predict Outcome in Traumatic Brain Injury: Comparison to Corticosteroid Randomization After Significant Head Injury
title_fullStr Does Red Cell Distribution Width Predict Outcome in Traumatic Brain Injury: Comparison to Corticosteroid Randomization After Significant Head Injury
title_full_unstemmed Does Red Cell Distribution Width Predict Outcome in Traumatic Brain Injury: Comparison to Corticosteroid Randomization After Significant Head Injury
title_short Does Red Cell Distribution Width Predict Outcome in Traumatic Brain Injury: Comparison to Corticosteroid Randomization After Significant Head Injury
title_sort does red cell distribution width predict outcome in traumatic brain injury: comparison to corticosteroid randomization after significant head injury
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5722039/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29238428
http://dx.doi.org/10.14740/jocmr3173w
work_keys_str_mv AT sadakafarid doesredcelldistributionwidthpredictoutcomeintraumaticbraininjurycomparisontocorticosteroidrandomizationaftersignificantheadinjury
AT doctorsnicholas doesredcelldistributionwidthpredictoutcomeintraumaticbraininjurycomparisontocorticosteroidrandomizationaftersignificantheadinjury
AT pearsontallia doesredcelldistributionwidthpredictoutcomeintraumaticbraininjurycomparisontocorticosteroidrandomizationaftersignificantheadinjury
AT snydersbrian doesredcelldistributionwidthpredictoutcomeintraumaticbraininjurycomparisontocorticosteroidrandomizationaftersignificantheadinjury
AT obrienjacklyn doesredcelldistributionwidthpredictoutcomeintraumaticbraininjurycomparisontocorticosteroidrandomizationaftersignificantheadinjury