Cargando…
Process evaluation of a primary healthcare validation study of a culturally adapted depression screening tool for use by Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people: study protocol
INTRODUCTION: Process evaluations are conducted alongside research projects to identify the context, impact and consequences of research, determine whether it was conducted per protocol and to understand how, why and for whom an intervention is effective. We present a process evaluation protocol for...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5722089/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29102990 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017612 |
_version_ | 1783284945480843264 |
---|---|
author | Farnbach, Sara Evans, John Eades, Anne-Marie Gee, Graham Fernando, Jamie Hammond, Belinda Simms, Matty DeMasi, Karrina Hackett, Maree |
author_facet | Farnbach, Sara Evans, John Eades, Anne-Marie Gee, Graham Fernando, Jamie Hammond, Belinda Simms, Matty DeMasi, Karrina Hackett, Maree |
author_sort | Farnbach, Sara |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Process evaluations are conducted alongside research projects to identify the context, impact and consequences of research, determine whether it was conducted per protocol and to understand how, why and for whom an intervention is effective. We present a process evaluation protocol for the Getting it Right research project, which aims to determine validity of a culturally adapted depression screening tool for use by Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people. In this process evaluation, we aim to: (1) explore the context, impact and consequences of conducting Getting It Right, (2) explore primary healthcare staff and community representatives’ experiences with the research project, (3) determine if it was conducted per protocol and (4) explore experiences with the depression screening tool, including perceptions about how it could be implemented into practice (if found to be valid). We also describe the partnerships established to conduct this process evaluation and how the national Values and Ethics: Guidelines for Ethical Conduct in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health Research is met. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Realist and grounded theory approaches are used. Qualitative data include semistructured interviews with primary healthcare staff and community representatives involved with Getting it Right. Iterative data collection and analysis will inform a coding framework. Interviews will continue until saturation of themes is reached, or all participants are considered. Data will be triangulated against administrative data and patient feedback. An Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Advisory Group guides this research. Researchers will be blinded from validation data outcomes for as long as is feasible. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The University of Sydney Human Research Ethics Committee, Aboriginal Health and Medical Research Council of New South Wales and six state ethics committees have approved this research. Findings will be submitted to academic journals and presented at conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12614000705684. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5722089 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57220892018-01-03 Process evaluation of a primary healthcare validation study of a culturally adapted depression screening tool for use by Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people: study protocol Farnbach, Sara Evans, John Eades, Anne-Marie Gee, Graham Fernando, Jamie Hammond, Belinda Simms, Matty DeMasi, Karrina Hackett, Maree BMJ Open Qualitative Research INTRODUCTION: Process evaluations are conducted alongside research projects to identify the context, impact and consequences of research, determine whether it was conducted per protocol and to understand how, why and for whom an intervention is effective. We present a process evaluation protocol for the Getting it Right research project, which aims to determine validity of a culturally adapted depression screening tool for use by Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people. In this process evaluation, we aim to: (1) explore the context, impact and consequences of conducting Getting It Right, (2) explore primary healthcare staff and community representatives’ experiences with the research project, (3) determine if it was conducted per protocol and (4) explore experiences with the depression screening tool, including perceptions about how it could be implemented into practice (if found to be valid). We also describe the partnerships established to conduct this process evaluation and how the national Values and Ethics: Guidelines for Ethical Conduct in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health Research is met. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Realist and grounded theory approaches are used. Qualitative data include semistructured interviews with primary healthcare staff and community representatives involved with Getting it Right. Iterative data collection and analysis will inform a coding framework. Interviews will continue until saturation of themes is reached, or all participants are considered. Data will be triangulated against administrative data and patient feedback. An Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Advisory Group guides this research. Researchers will be blinded from validation data outcomes for as long as is feasible. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The University of Sydney Human Research Ethics Committee, Aboriginal Health and Medical Research Council of New South Wales and six state ethics committees have approved this research. Findings will be submitted to academic journals and presented at conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12614000705684. BMJ Publishing Group 2017-11-03 /pmc/articles/PMC5722089/ /pubmed/29102990 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017612 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Qualitative Research Farnbach, Sara Evans, John Eades, Anne-Marie Gee, Graham Fernando, Jamie Hammond, Belinda Simms, Matty DeMasi, Karrina Hackett, Maree Process evaluation of a primary healthcare validation study of a culturally adapted depression screening tool for use by Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people: study protocol |
title | Process evaluation of a primary healthcare validation study of a culturally adapted depression screening tool for use by Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people: study protocol |
title_full | Process evaluation of a primary healthcare validation study of a culturally adapted depression screening tool for use by Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people: study protocol |
title_fullStr | Process evaluation of a primary healthcare validation study of a culturally adapted depression screening tool for use by Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people: study protocol |
title_full_unstemmed | Process evaluation of a primary healthcare validation study of a culturally adapted depression screening tool for use by Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people: study protocol |
title_short | Process evaluation of a primary healthcare validation study of a culturally adapted depression screening tool for use by Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people: study protocol |
title_sort | process evaluation of a primary healthcare validation study of a culturally adapted depression screening tool for use by aboriginal and torres strait islander people: study protocol |
topic | Qualitative Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5722089/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29102990 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017612 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT farnbachsara processevaluationofaprimaryhealthcarevalidationstudyofaculturallyadapteddepressionscreeningtoolforusebyaboriginalandtorresstraitislanderpeoplestudyprotocol AT evansjohn processevaluationofaprimaryhealthcarevalidationstudyofaculturallyadapteddepressionscreeningtoolforusebyaboriginalandtorresstraitislanderpeoplestudyprotocol AT eadesannemarie processevaluationofaprimaryhealthcarevalidationstudyofaculturallyadapteddepressionscreeningtoolforusebyaboriginalandtorresstraitislanderpeoplestudyprotocol AT geegraham processevaluationofaprimaryhealthcarevalidationstudyofaculturallyadapteddepressionscreeningtoolforusebyaboriginalandtorresstraitislanderpeoplestudyprotocol AT fernandojamie processevaluationofaprimaryhealthcarevalidationstudyofaculturallyadapteddepressionscreeningtoolforusebyaboriginalandtorresstraitislanderpeoplestudyprotocol AT hammondbelinda processevaluationofaprimaryhealthcarevalidationstudyofaculturallyadapteddepressionscreeningtoolforusebyaboriginalandtorresstraitislanderpeoplestudyprotocol AT simmsmatty processevaluationofaprimaryhealthcarevalidationstudyofaculturallyadapteddepressionscreeningtoolforusebyaboriginalandtorresstraitislanderpeoplestudyprotocol AT demasikarrina processevaluationofaprimaryhealthcarevalidationstudyofaculturallyadapteddepressionscreeningtoolforusebyaboriginalandtorresstraitislanderpeoplestudyprotocol AT hackettmaree processevaluationofaprimaryhealthcarevalidationstudyofaculturallyadapteddepressionscreeningtoolforusebyaboriginalandtorresstraitislanderpeoplestudyprotocol |