Cargando…

Efficiency of Different Endodontic Irrigation and Activation Systems in Removal of the Smear Layer: A Scanning Electron Microscopy Study

INTRODUCTION: This in vitro study was designed to evaluate and compare different endodontic irrigation and activation systems for removal of the intracanal smear layer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Forty recently extracted, non-carious human intact single rooted premolars were selected and divided into fi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Karade, Priyatam, Chopade, Rutuja, Patil, Suvarna, Hoshing, Upendra, Rao, Madhukar, Rane, Neha, Chopade, Aditi, Kulkarni, Anish
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Iranian Center for Endodontic Research 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5722115/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29225634
http://dx.doi.org/10.22037/iej.v12i4.9571
_version_ 1783284952260935680
author Karade, Priyatam
Chopade, Rutuja
Patil, Suvarna
Hoshing, Upendra
Rao, Madhukar
Rane, Neha
Chopade, Aditi
Kulkarni, Anish
author_facet Karade, Priyatam
Chopade, Rutuja
Patil, Suvarna
Hoshing, Upendra
Rao, Madhukar
Rane, Neha
Chopade, Aditi
Kulkarni, Anish
author_sort Karade, Priyatam
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: This in vitro study was designed to evaluate and compare different endodontic irrigation and activation systems for removal of the intracanal smear layer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Forty recently extracted, non-carious human intact single rooted premolars were selected and divided into five groups (n=10) according to the root canal irrigation systems; syringe and needle irrigation (CTR), sonic irrigation, passive ultrasonic irrigation (PUI) and EndoVac irrigation system. All groups were prepared to #40 apical size with K-files. Each sample was subjected to final irrigation by using four different irrigation/activation systems. After splitting the samples, one half of each root was selected for examination under scanning electron microscope (SEM). The irrigation systems were compared using the Fisher's exact test with the level of significance set at 0.05. RESULTS: The four groups did not differ from each other in the coronal and mid-root parts of the canal. In the apical part of the canal none of the methods could completely remove all the smear layer but EndoVac system showed significantly better removal of smear layer and debris than the other methods. CONCLUSION: Within the limitations of the present study, the EndoVac system cleaned the apical part of the canal more efficiently than sonic, ultrasonic and syringe and needle irrigation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5722115
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Iranian Center for Endodontic Research
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57221152017-12-08 Efficiency of Different Endodontic Irrigation and Activation Systems in Removal of the Smear Layer: A Scanning Electron Microscopy Study Karade, Priyatam Chopade, Rutuja Patil, Suvarna Hoshing, Upendra Rao, Madhukar Rane, Neha Chopade, Aditi Kulkarni, Anish Iran Endod J Original Article INTRODUCTION: This in vitro study was designed to evaluate and compare different endodontic irrigation and activation systems for removal of the intracanal smear layer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Forty recently extracted, non-carious human intact single rooted premolars were selected and divided into five groups (n=10) according to the root canal irrigation systems; syringe and needle irrigation (CTR), sonic irrigation, passive ultrasonic irrigation (PUI) and EndoVac irrigation system. All groups were prepared to #40 apical size with K-files. Each sample was subjected to final irrigation by using four different irrigation/activation systems. After splitting the samples, one half of each root was selected for examination under scanning electron microscope (SEM). The irrigation systems were compared using the Fisher's exact test with the level of significance set at 0.05. RESULTS: The four groups did not differ from each other in the coronal and mid-root parts of the canal. In the apical part of the canal none of the methods could completely remove all the smear layer but EndoVac system showed significantly better removal of smear layer and debris than the other methods. CONCLUSION: Within the limitations of the present study, the EndoVac system cleaned the apical part of the canal more efficiently than sonic, ultrasonic and syringe and needle irrigation. Iranian Center for Endodontic Research 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5722115/ /pubmed/29225634 http://dx.doi.org/10.22037/iej.v12i4.9571 Text en This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Karade, Priyatam
Chopade, Rutuja
Patil, Suvarna
Hoshing, Upendra
Rao, Madhukar
Rane, Neha
Chopade, Aditi
Kulkarni, Anish
Efficiency of Different Endodontic Irrigation and Activation Systems in Removal of the Smear Layer: A Scanning Electron Microscopy Study
title Efficiency of Different Endodontic Irrigation and Activation Systems in Removal of the Smear Layer: A Scanning Electron Microscopy Study
title_full Efficiency of Different Endodontic Irrigation and Activation Systems in Removal of the Smear Layer: A Scanning Electron Microscopy Study
title_fullStr Efficiency of Different Endodontic Irrigation and Activation Systems in Removal of the Smear Layer: A Scanning Electron Microscopy Study
title_full_unstemmed Efficiency of Different Endodontic Irrigation and Activation Systems in Removal of the Smear Layer: A Scanning Electron Microscopy Study
title_short Efficiency of Different Endodontic Irrigation and Activation Systems in Removal of the Smear Layer: A Scanning Electron Microscopy Study
title_sort efficiency of different endodontic irrigation and activation systems in removal of the smear layer: a scanning electron microscopy study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5722115/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29225634
http://dx.doi.org/10.22037/iej.v12i4.9571
work_keys_str_mv AT karadepriyatam efficiencyofdifferentendodonticirrigationandactivationsystemsinremovalofthesmearlayerascanningelectronmicroscopystudy
AT chopaderutuja efficiencyofdifferentendodonticirrigationandactivationsystemsinremovalofthesmearlayerascanningelectronmicroscopystudy
AT patilsuvarna efficiencyofdifferentendodonticirrigationandactivationsystemsinremovalofthesmearlayerascanningelectronmicroscopystudy
AT hoshingupendra efficiencyofdifferentendodonticirrigationandactivationsystemsinremovalofthesmearlayerascanningelectronmicroscopystudy
AT raomadhukar efficiencyofdifferentendodonticirrigationandactivationsystemsinremovalofthesmearlayerascanningelectronmicroscopystudy
AT raneneha efficiencyofdifferentendodonticirrigationandactivationsystemsinremovalofthesmearlayerascanningelectronmicroscopystudy
AT chopadeaditi efficiencyofdifferentendodonticirrigationandactivationsystemsinremovalofthesmearlayerascanningelectronmicroscopystudy
AT kulkarnianish efficiencyofdifferentendodonticirrigationandactivationsystemsinremovalofthesmearlayerascanningelectronmicroscopystudy