Cargando…
Incidence of Dentinal Crack after Root Canal Preparation by ProTaper Universal, Neolix and SafeSider Systems
INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to compare the incidence of dentinal crack formation by instrumentation with ProTaper Universal system (rotary, multi-file system), SafeSider (reciprocation movement, multi-file system) and Neolix (rotary, single-file system). METHODS AND MATERIALS: In this in vitro st...
Autores principales: | Harandi, Azadeh, Mirzaeerad, Sina, Mehrabani, Mahgol, Mahmoudi, Elham, Bijani, Ali |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Iranian Center for Endodontic Research
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5722122/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29225637 http://dx.doi.org/10.22037/iej.v12i4.17597 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Canal Transportation and Centering Ability of ProTaper and SafeSider in Preparation of Curved Root Canals: A CBCT Evaluation
por: Delgoshayi, Negar, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
An In vitro Comparison of Apically Extruded Debris Using Reciproc, ProTaper Universal, Neolix and Hyflex in Curved Canals
por: Labbaf, Hossein, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Comparison of the shaping characteristics of Neolix and Protaper Universal systems in preparation of severely-curved simulated canals
por: Forghani, Maryam, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Incidence of Dentinal Crack Formation Using ProTaper Universal and WaveOne Systems in Straight and Curved Root Canals
por: Mohammadzade Akhlaghi, Nahid, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Influence of a glide path on the dentinal crack formation of ProTaper Next system
por: Aktemur Türker, Sevinç, et al.
Publicado: (2015)