Cargando…

Case study of radiation therapy treatment of a patient with a cardiac ventricular assist device

A patient with a cardiac ventricular assist device (VAD) with computer‐controlled driver presented to our department for radiation therapy. The treatment plan was 4500 cGy to the rectum over 25 fractions with 15MV photon beams. All beams avoided the pump and leads. The response to electromagnetic in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lasher, Donette E., Wojcicka, Jadwiga B., Malcom, Ronald, Shears, Lawrence L
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5722350/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19020490
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v9i4.2851
_version_ 1783284992958267392
author Lasher, Donette E.
Wojcicka, Jadwiga B.
Malcom, Ronald
Shears, Lawrence L
author_facet Lasher, Donette E.
Wojcicka, Jadwiga B.
Malcom, Ronald
Shears, Lawrence L
author_sort Lasher, Donette E.
collection PubMed
description A patient with a cardiac ventricular assist device (VAD) with computer‐controlled driver presented to our department for radiation therapy. The treatment plan was 4500 cGy to the rectum over 25 fractions with 15MV photon beams. All beams avoided the pump and leads. The response to electromagnetic interference (EMI) was evaluated by observing a duplicate driver in the treatment configuration as the patient's fields were delivered to a solid water equivalent phantom. Pretreatment dose assessment included calculations with Pinnacle treatment planning system, AAPM TG36 data analysis, and MOSFET measurements on the surface of the driver during the phantom irradiation. During the first patient treatment, MOSFETs were placed on the pump and leads, approximately 1cm from the left lateral treatment portal. No additional shielding was applied to the VAD. EMI was absent and the VAD operated normally during the pretreatment test and throughout the treatment course. Radiation to the driver was too low to be detected by the MOSFETS. Cumulative dose estimates to the pump were 425cGy to 0. 1cc (DVH), 368cGy (TG36), and 158.5cGy (MOSFET). MOSFET readings to the leads were 70.5cGy. External beam radiation treatment was safely delivered to a VAD dependent patient. The VAD exhibited no adverse response to EMI and doses up to 425 cGy. Our results are based on one case and further study is encouraged. PACS number: 87.53.Dq
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5722350
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57223502018-04-02 Case study of radiation therapy treatment of a patient with a cardiac ventricular assist device Lasher, Donette E. Wojcicka, Jadwiga B. Malcom, Ronald Shears, Lawrence L J Appl Clin Med Phys Technical Notes A patient with a cardiac ventricular assist device (VAD) with computer‐controlled driver presented to our department for radiation therapy. The treatment plan was 4500 cGy to the rectum over 25 fractions with 15MV photon beams. All beams avoided the pump and leads. The response to electromagnetic interference (EMI) was evaluated by observing a duplicate driver in the treatment configuration as the patient's fields were delivered to a solid water equivalent phantom. Pretreatment dose assessment included calculations with Pinnacle treatment planning system, AAPM TG36 data analysis, and MOSFET measurements on the surface of the driver during the phantom irradiation. During the first patient treatment, MOSFETs were placed on the pump and leads, approximately 1cm from the left lateral treatment portal. No additional shielding was applied to the VAD. EMI was absent and the VAD operated normally during the pretreatment test and throughout the treatment course. Radiation to the driver was too low to be detected by the MOSFETS. Cumulative dose estimates to the pump were 425cGy to 0. 1cc (DVH), 368cGy (TG36), and 158.5cGy (MOSFET). MOSFET readings to the leads were 70.5cGy. External beam radiation treatment was safely delivered to a VAD dependent patient. The VAD exhibited no adverse response to EMI and doses up to 425 cGy. Our results are based on one case and further study is encouraged. PACS number: 87.53.Dq John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2008-10-29 /pmc/articles/PMC5722350/ /pubmed/19020490 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v9i4.2851 Text en © 2008 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Technical Notes
Lasher, Donette E.
Wojcicka, Jadwiga B.
Malcom, Ronald
Shears, Lawrence L
Case study of radiation therapy treatment of a patient with a cardiac ventricular assist device
title Case study of radiation therapy treatment of a patient with a cardiac ventricular assist device
title_full Case study of radiation therapy treatment of a patient with a cardiac ventricular assist device
title_fullStr Case study of radiation therapy treatment of a patient with a cardiac ventricular assist device
title_full_unstemmed Case study of radiation therapy treatment of a patient with a cardiac ventricular assist device
title_short Case study of radiation therapy treatment of a patient with a cardiac ventricular assist device
title_sort case study of radiation therapy treatment of a patient with a cardiac ventricular assist device
topic Technical Notes
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5722350/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19020490
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v9i4.2851
work_keys_str_mv AT lasherdonettee casestudyofradiationtherapytreatmentofapatientwithacardiacventricularassistdevice
AT wojcickajadwigab casestudyofradiationtherapytreatmentofapatientwithacardiacventricularassistdevice
AT malcomronald casestudyofradiationtherapytreatmentofapatientwithacardiacventricularassistdevice
AT shearslawrencel casestudyofradiationtherapytreatmentofapatientwithacardiacventricularassistdevice