Cargando…
Compensator‐based intensity‐modulated radiation therapy for malignant pleural mesothelioma post extrapleural pneumonectomy
The present work investigated the potential of compensator‐based intensity‐modulated radiation therapy (CB‐IMRT) as an alternative to multileaf collimator (MLC)–based intensity‐modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) to treat malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) post extrapleural pneumonectomy. Treatment...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2008
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5722359/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19020484 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v9i4.2799 |
_version_ | 1783284995115188224 |
---|---|
author | Javedan, Khosrow Stevens, Craig W. Forster, Kenneth M. |
author_facet | Javedan, Khosrow Stevens, Craig W. Forster, Kenneth M. |
author_sort | Javedan, Khosrow |
collection | PubMed |
description | The present work investigated the potential of compensator‐based intensity‐modulated radiation therapy (CB‐IMRT) as an alternative to multileaf collimator (MLC)–based intensity‐modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) to treat malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) post extrapleural pneumonectomy. Treatment plans for 4 right‐sided and 1 left‐sided MPM post‐surgery cases were generated using a commercial treatment planning system, XIO/CMS (Computerized Medical Systems, St. Louis, MO). We used a 7‐gantry‐angle arrangement with 6 MV beams to generate these plans. The maximum required field size was [Formula: see text]. We evaluated IMRT plans with brass compensators (•Decimal, Sanford, FL) by examining isodose distributions, dose–volume histograms, metrics to quantify conformal plan quality, and homogeneity. Quality assurance was performed for one of the compensator plans. Conformal dose distributions were achieved with CB‐IMRT for all 5 cases, the average planning target volume (PTV) coverage being 95.1% of the PTV volume receiving the full prescription dose. The average lung [Formula: see text] (volume of lung receiving 20 Gy) was 1.8%, the mean lung dose was 6.7 Gy, and the average contralateral kidney [Formula: see text] was 0.6%. The average liver dose [Formula: see text] was 34.0% for the right‐sided cases and 10% for the left‐sided case. The average monitor units (MUs) per fraction were 980 MUs for the 45‐Gy prescriptions (mean: 50 Gy) and 1083 MUs for the 50‐Gy prescriptions (mean: 54 Gy). Post surgery, CB‐IMRT for MPM is a feasible IMRT technique for treatment with a single isocenter. Compensator plans achieved dose objectives and were safely delivered on a Siemens Oncor machine (Siemens Medical Solutions, Malvern, PA). These plans showed acceptably conformal dose distributions as confirmed by multiple measurement techniques. Not all linear accelerators can deliver large‐field MLC‐based IMRT, but most can deliver a maximum conformal field of [Formula: see text]. It is possible and reasonable to deliver IMRT with compensators for fields this size with most conventional linear accelerators. PACS numbers: 87.56.ng, 87.56.N, 87.55.D, 87.55.dk |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5722359 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2008 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57223592018-04-02 Compensator‐based intensity‐modulated radiation therapy for malignant pleural mesothelioma post extrapleural pneumonectomy Javedan, Khosrow Stevens, Craig W. Forster, Kenneth M. J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics The present work investigated the potential of compensator‐based intensity‐modulated radiation therapy (CB‐IMRT) as an alternative to multileaf collimator (MLC)–based intensity‐modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) to treat malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) post extrapleural pneumonectomy. Treatment plans for 4 right‐sided and 1 left‐sided MPM post‐surgery cases were generated using a commercial treatment planning system, XIO/CMS (Computerized Medical Systems, St. Louis, MO). We used a 7‐gantry‐angle arrangement with 6 MV beams to generate these plans. The maximum required field size was [Formula: see text]. We evaluated IMRT plans with brass compensators (•Decimal, Sanford, FL) by examining isodose distributions, dose–volume histograms, metrics to quantify conformal plan quality, and homogeneity. Quality assurance was performed for one of the compensator plans. Conformal dose distributions were achieved with CB‐IMRT for all 5 cases, the average planning target volume (PTV) coverage being 95.1% of the PTV volume receiving the full prescription dose. The average lung [Formula: see text] (volume of lung receiving 20 Gy) was 1.8%, the mean lung dose was 6.7 Gy, and the average contralateral kidney [Formula: see text] was 0.6%. The average liver dose [Formula: see text] was 34.0% for the right‐sided cases and 10% for the left‐sided case. The average monitor units (MUs) per fraction were 980 MUs for the 45‐Gy prescriptions (mean: 50 Gy) and 1083 MUs for the 50‐Gy prescriptions (mean: 54 Gy). Post surgery, CB‐IMRT for MPM is a feasible IMRT technique for treatment with a single isocenter. Compensator plans achieved dose objectives and were safely delivered on a Siemens Oncor machine (Siemens Medical Solutions, Malvern, PA). These plans showed acceptably conformal dose distributions as confirmed by multiple measurement techniques. Not all linear accelerators can deliver large‐field MLC‐based IMRT, but most can deliver a maximum conformal field of [Formula: see text]. It is possible and reasonable to deliver IMRT with compensators for fields this size with most conventional linear accelerators. PACS numbers: 87.56.ng, 87.56.N, 87.55.D, 87.55.dk John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2008-10-29 /pmc/articles/PMC5722359/ /pubmed/19020484 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v9i4.2799 Text en © 2008 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Radiation Oncology Physics Javedan, Khosrow Stevens, Craig W. Forster, Kenneth M. Compensator‐based intensity‐modulated radiation therapy for malignant pleural mesothelioma post extrapleural pneumonectomy |
title | Compensator‐based intensity‐modulated radiation therapy for malignant pleural mesothelioma post extrapleural pneumonectomy |
title_full | Compensator‐based intensity‐modulated radiation therapy for malignant pleural mesothelioma post extrapleural pneumonectomy |
title_fullStr | Compensator‐based intensity‐modulated radiation therapy for malignant pleural mesothelioma post extrapleural pneumonectomy |
title_full_unstemmed | Compensator‐based intensity‐modulated radiation therapy for malignant pleural mesothelioma post extrapleural pneumonectomy |
title_short | Compensator‐based intensity‐modulated radiation therapy for malignant pleural mesothelioma post extrapleural pneumonectomy |
title_sort | compensator‐based intensity‐modulated radiation therapy for malignant pleural mesothelioma post extrapleural pneumonectomy |
topic | Radiation Oncology Physics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5722359/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19020484 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v9i4.2799 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT javedankhosrow compensatorbasedintensitymodulatedradiationtherapyformalignantpleuralmesotheliomapostextrapleuralpneumonectomy AT stevenscraigw compensatorbasedintensitymodulatedradiationtherapyformalignantpleuralmesotheliomapostextrapleuralpneumonectomy AT forsterkennethm compensatorbasedintensitymodulatedradiationtherapyformalignantpleuralmesotheliomapostextrapleuralpneumonectomy |