Cargando…

Compensator‐based intensity‐modulated radiation therapy for malignant pleural mesothelioma post extrapleural pneumonectomy

The present work investigated the potential of compensator‐based intensity‐modulated radiation therapy (CB‐IMRT) as an alternative to multileaf collimator (MLC)–based intensity‐modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) to treat malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) post extrapleural pneumonectomy. Treatment...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Javedan, Khosrow, Stevens, Craig W., Forster, Kenneth M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5722359/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19020484
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v9i4.2799
_version_ 1783284995115188224
author Javedan, Khosrow
Stevens, Craig W.
Forster, Kenneth M.
author_facet Javedan, Khosrow
Stevens, Craig W.
Forster, Kenneth M.
author_sort Javedan, Khosrow
collection PubMed
description The present work investigated the potential of compensator‐based intensity‐modulated radiation therapy (CB‐IMRT) as an alternative to multileaf collimator (MLC)–based intensity‐modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) to treat malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) post extrapleural pneumonectomy. Treatment plans for 4 right‐sided and 1 left‐sided MPM post‐surgery cases were generated using a commercial treatment planning system, XIO/CMS (Computerized Medical Systems, St. Louis, MO). We used a 7‐gantry‐angle arrangement with 6 MV beams to generate these plans. The maximum required field size was [Formula: see text]. We evaluated IMRT plans with brass compensators (•Decimal, Sanford, FL) by examining isodose distributions, dose–volume histograms, metrics to quantify conformal plan quality, and homogeneity. Quality assurance was performed for one of the compensator plans. Conformal dose distributions were achieved with CB‐IMRT for all 5 cases, the average planning target volume (PTV) coverage being 95.1% of the PTV volume receiving the full prescription dose. The average lung [Formula: see text] (volume of lung receiving 20 Gy) was 1.8%, the mean lung dose was 6.7 Gy, and the average contralateral kidney [Formula: see text] was 0.6%. The average liver dose [Formula: see text] was 34.0% for the right‐sided cases and 10% for the left‐sided case. The average monitor units (MUs) per fraction were 980 MUs for the 45‐Gy prescriptions (mean: 50 Gy) and 1083 MUs for the 50‐Gy prescriptions (mean: 54 Gy). Post surgery, CB‐IMRT for MPM is a feasible IMRT technique for treatment with a single isocenter. Compensator plans achieved dose objectives and were safely delivered on a Siemens Oncor machine (Siemens Medical Solutions, Malvern, PA). These plans showed acceptably conformal dose distributions as confirmed by multiple measurement techniques. Not all linear accelerators can deliver large‐field MLC‐based IMRT, but most can deliver a maximum conformal field of [Formula: see text]. It is possible and reasonable to deliver IMRT with compensators for fields this size with most conventional linear accelerators. PACS numbers: 87.56.ng, 87.56.N, 87.55.D, 87.55.dk
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5722359
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57223592018-04-02 Compensator‐based intensity‐modulated radiation therapy for malignant pleural mesothelioma post extrapleural pneumonectomy Javedan, Khosrow Stevens, Craig W. Forster, Kenneth M. J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics The present work investigated the potential of compensator‐based intensity‐modulated radiation therapy (CB‐IMRT) as an alternative to multileaf collimator (MLC)–based intensity‐modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) to treat malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) post extrapleural pneumonectomy. Treatment plans for 4 right‐sided and 1 left‐sided MPM post‐surgery cases were generated using a commercial treatment planning system, XIO/CMS (Computerized Medical Systems, St. Louis, MO). We used a 7‐gantry‐angle arrangement with 6 MV beams to generate these plans. The maximum required field size was [Formula: see text]. We evaluated IMRT plans with brass compensators (•Decimal, Sanford, FL) by examining isodose distributions, dose–volume histograms, metrics to quantify conformal plan quality, and homogeneity. Quality assurance was performed for one of the compensator plans. Conformal dose distributions were achieved with CB‐IMRT for all 5 cases, the average planning target volume (PTV) coverage being 95.1% of the PTV volume receiving the full prescription dose. The average lung [Formula: see text] (volume of lung receiving 20 Gy) was 1.8%, the mean lung dose was 6.7 Gy, and the average contralateral kidney [Formula: see text] was 0.6%. The average liver dose [Formula: see text] was 34.0% for the right‐sided cases and 10% for the left‐sided case. The average monitor units (MUs) per fraction were 980 MUs for the 45‐Gy prescriptions (mean: 50 Gy) and 1083 MUs for the 50‐Gy prescriptions (mean: 54 Gy). Post surgery, CB‐IMRT for MPM is a feasible IMRT technique for treatment with a single isocenter. Compensator plans achieved dose objectives and were safely delivered on a Siemens Oncor machine (Siemens Medical Solutions, Malvern, PA). These plans showed acceptably conformal dose distributions as confirmed by multiple measurement techniques. Not all linear accelerators can deliver large‐field MLC‐based IMRT, but most can deliver a maximum conformal field of [Formula: see text]. It is possible and reasonable to deliver IMRT with compensators for fields this size with most conventional linear accelerators. PACS numbers: 87.56.ng, 87.56.N, 87.55.D, 87.55.dk John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2008-10-29 /pmc/articles/PMC5722359/ /pubmed/19020484 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v9i4.2799 Text en © 2008 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Javedan, Khosrow
Stevens, Craig W.
Forster, Kenneth M.
Compensator‐based intensity‐modulated radiation therapy for malignant pleural mesothelioma post extrapleural pneumonectomy
title Compensator‐based intensity‐modulated radiation therapy for malignant pleural mesothelioma post extrapleural pneumonectomy
title_full Compensator‐based intensity‐modulated radiation therapy for malignant pleural mesothelioma post extrapleural pneumonectomy
title_fullStr Compensator‐based intensity‐modulated radiation therapy for malignant pleural mesothelioma post extrapleural pneumonectomy
title_full_unstemmed Compensator‐based intensity‐modulated radiation therapy for malignant pleural mesothelioma post extrapleural pneumonectomy
title_short Compensator‐based intensity‐modulated radiation therapy for malignant pleural mesothelioma post extrapleural pneumonectomy
title_sort compensator‐based intensity‐modulated radiation therapy for malignant pleural mesothelioma post extrapleural pneumonectomy
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5722359/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19020484
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v9i4.2799
work_keys_str_mv AT javedankhosrow compensatorbasedintensitymodulatedradiationtherapyformalignantpleuralmesotheliomapostextrapleuralpneumonectomy
AT stevenscraigw compensatorbasedintensitymodulatedradiationtherapyformalignantpleuralmesotheliomapostextrapleuralpneumonectomy
AT forsterkennethm compensatorbasedintensitymodulatedradiationtherapyformalignantpleuralmesotheliomapostextrapleuralpneumonectomy