Cargando…

Effect of contrast‐enhanced CT scans on heterogeneity corrected dose computations in the lung

The aim of this study was to investigate and, if possible, compensate for the effect of intravenous contrast‐enhanced CT scans on the treatment planning dose distributions for lung patients. The contrast and noncontrast CT scans of 3 patients were registered, and the effect of contrast on the Hounsf...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Burridge, Nichola A., Rowbottom, Carl G., Burt, Paul A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2006
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5722395/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17533351
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v7i4.2240
_version_ 1783285003819417600
author Burridge, Nichola A.
Rowbottom, Carl G.
Burt, Paul A.
author_facet Burridge, Nichola A.
Rowbottom, Carl G.
Burt, Paul A.
author_sort Burridge, Nichola A.
collection PubMed
description The aim of this study was to investigate and, if possible, compensate for the effect of intravenous contrast‐enhanced CT scans on the treatment planning dose distributions for lung patients. The contrast and noncontrast CT scans of 3 patients were registered, and the effect of contrast on the Hounsfield units (HU) was assessed. The effect of contrast was then simulated in the CT scans of 18 patients receiving radiotherapy of the lung by modification of the CT numbers for relevant sections of noncontrast‐enhanced CT scans. All treatment planning was performed on the Pinnacle (3) planning system. The dose distributions computed from simulated contrast CT scans were compared to the original dose distributions by comparison of the monitor units (MUs) for each beam in the treatment plan required to deliver the prescribed dose to the isocenter as well as a comparison of the total MUs for each patient, a percentage change in required MUs being equivalent to a percentage change in the dose. A correction strategy to enable the use of contrast‐enhanced CT scans in treatment planning was developed, and the feasibility of applying the strategy was investigated by calculating dose distributions for both the original and simulated contrast CT scans. A mean increase in the overall patient MUs of [Formula: see text] was found, with a maximum increase of 3.3% when contrast was simulated on the original CT scans. The simulated contrast scans confirmed that the use of contrast‐enhanced CT scans for routine treatment planning would result in a systematic change in the dose delivered to the isocenter. The devised correction strategy had no clinically relevant effect on the dose distribution for the original CT scans. The application of the correction strategy to the simulated contrast CT scans led to a reduction of the mean difference in the overall MUs to [Formula: see text] compared to the original scan, demonstrating that the effect of contrast was eliminated with the correction strategy. This work has highlighted the problems associated with using contrast‐enhanced CT scans in heterogeneity corrected dose computation. Contrast visible in the CT scan is transient and should not be accounted for in the treatment plan. A correction strategy has been developed that minimizes the effect of intravenous contrast while having no clinical effect on noncontrast CT scans. The correction strategy allows the use of contrast without detriment to the treatment plan. PACS number: 87.53.Tf
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5722395
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2006
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57223952018-04-02 Effect of contrast‐enhanced CT scans on heterogeneity corrected dose computations in the lung Burridge, Nichola A. Rowbottom, Carl G. Burt, Paul A. J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics The aim of this study was to investigate and, if possible, compensate for the effect of intravenous contrast‐enhanced CT scans on the treatment planning dose distributions for lung patients. The contrast and noncontrast CT scans of 3 patients were registered, and the effect of contrast on the Hounsfield units (HU) was assessed. The effect of contrast was then simulated in the CT scans of 18 patients receiving radiotherapy of the lung by modification of the CT numbers for relevant sections of noncontrast‐enhanced CT scans. All treatment planning was performed on the Pinnacle (3) planning system. The dose distributions computed from simulated contrast CT scans were compared to the original dose distributions by comparison of the monitor units (MUs) for each beam in the treatment plan required to deliver the prescribed dose to the isocenter as well as a comparison of the total MUs for each patient, a percentage change in required MUs being equivalent to a percentage change in the dose. A correction strategy to enable the use of contrast‐enhanced CT scans in treatment planning was developed, and the feasibility of applying the strategy was investigated by calculating dose distributions for both the original and simulated contrast CT scans. A mean increase in the overall patient MUs of [Formula: see text] was found, with a maximum increase of 3.3% when contrast was simulated on the original CT scans. The simulated contrast scans confirmed that the use of contrast‐enhanced CT scans for routine treatment planning would result in a systematic change in the dose delivered to the isocenter. The devised correction strategy had no clinically relevant effect on the dose distribution for the original CT scans. The application of the correction strategy to the simulated contrast CT scans led to a reduction of the mean difference in the overall MUs to [Formula: see text] compared to the original scan, demonstrating that the effect of contrast was eliminated with the correction strategy. This work has highlighted the problems associated with using contrast‐enhanced CT scans in heterogeneity corrected dose computation. Contrast visible in the CT scan is transient and should not be accounted for in the treatment plan. A correction strategy has been developed that minimizes the effect of intravenous contrast while having no clinical effect on noncontrast CT scans. The correction strategy allows the use of contrast without detriment to the treatment plan. PACS number: 87.53.Tf John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2006-11-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5722395/ /pubmed/17533351 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v7i4.2240 Text en © 2006 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Burridge, Nichola A.
Rowbottom, Carl G.
Burt, Paul A.
Effect of contrast‐enhanced CT scans on heterogeneity corrected dose computations in the lung
title Effect of contrast‐enhanced CT scans on heterogeneity corrected dose computations in the lung
title_full Effect of contrast‐enhanced CT scans on heterogeneity corrected dose computations in the lung
title_fullStr Effect of contrast‐enhanced CT scans on heterogeneity corrected dose computations in the lung
title_full_unstemmed Effect of contrast‐enhanced CT scans on heterogeneity corrected dose computations in the lung
title_short Effect of contrast‐enhanced CT scans on heterogeneity corrected dose computations in the lung
title_sort effect of contrast‐enhanced ct scans on heterogeneity corrected dose computations in the lung
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5722395/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17533351
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v7i4.2240
work_keys_str_mv AT burridgenicholaa effectofcontrastenhancedctscansonheterogeneitycorrecteddosecomputationsinthelung
AT rowbottomcarlg effectofcontrastenhancedctscansonheterogeneitycorrecteddosecomputationsinthelung
AT burtpaula effectofcontrastenhancedctscansonheterogeneitycorrecteddosecomputationsinthelung