Cargando…
Post‐implant computed tomography–magnetic resonance prostate image registration using feature line parallelization and normalized mutual information
Post‐implant dosimetry for permanent prostate brachytherapy is typically performed using computed tomography (CT) images, for which the clear visualization of soft tissue structures is problematic. Registration of CT and magnetic resonance (MR) image volumes can improve the definition of all structu...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2007
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5722399/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17592452 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v8i1.2351 |
_version_ | 1783285004784107520 |
---|---|
author | Vidakovic, Sandra Jans, Hans S. Alexander, Abe Sloboda, Ron S. |
author_facet | Vidakovic, Sandra Jans, Hans S. Alexander, Abe Sloboda, Ron S. |
author_sort | Vidakovic, Sandra |
collection | PubMed |
description | Post‐implant dosimetry for permanent prostate brachytherapy is typically performed using computed tomography (CT) images, for which the clear visualization of soft tissue structures is problematic. Registration of CT and magnetic resonance (MR) image volumes can improve the definition of all structures of interest (soft tissues, bones, and seeds) in the joint image set. In the present paper, we describe a novel two‐stage rigid‐body registration algorithm that consists of (1) parallelization of straight lines fit to image features running primarily in the superior–inferior (Z) direction, followed by (2) normalized mutual information registration. The first stage serves to fix rotation angles about the anterior–posterior (Y) and left–right (X) directions, and the second stage determines the remaining Z‐axis rotation angle and the X, Y, Z translation values. The new algorithm was applied to CT and 1.5T MR (T2‐weighted and balanced fast‐field echo sequences) axial image sets for three patients acquired four weeks after prostate brachytherapy using [Formula: see text] seeds. Image features used for the stage 1 parallelization were seed trains in CT and needle tracks and seed voids in MR. Simulated datasets were also created to further investigate algorithm performance. Clinical image volumes were successfully registered using the two‐stage approach to within a root‐mean‐squares (RMS) distance of <1.5 mm, provided that some pubic bone and anterior rectum were included in the registration volume of interest and that no motion artifact was apparent. This level of accuracy is comparable to that obtained for the same clinical datasets using the Procrustes algorithm. Unlike Procrustes, the new algorithm can be almost fully automated, and hence we conclude that its further development for application in post‐implant dosimetry is warranted. PACS numbers: 87.53.Jw, 87.57.Gg, 87.59.Fm, 87.61.Pk |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5722399 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2007 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57223992018-04-02 Post‐implant computed tomography–magnetic resonance prostate image registration using feature line parallelization and normalized mutual information Vidakovic, Sandra Jans, Hans S. Alexander, Abe Sloboda, Ron S. J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics Post‐implant dosimetry for permanent prostate brachytherapy is typically performed using computed tomography (CT) images, for which the clear visualization of soft tissue structures is problematic. Registration of CT and magnetic resonance (MR) image volumes can improve the definition of all structures of interest (soft tissues, bones, and seeds) in the joint image set. In the present paper, we describe a novel two‐stage rigid‐body registration algorithm that consists of (1) parallelization of straight lines fit to image features running primarily in the superior–inferior (Z) direction, followed by (2) normalized mutual information registration. The first stage serves to fix rotation angles about the anterior–posterior (Y) and left–right (X) directions, and the second stage determines the remaining Z‐axis rotation angle and the X, Y, Z translation values. The new algorithm was applied to CT and 1.5T MR (T2‐weighted and balanced fast‐field echo sequences) axial image sets for three patients acquired four weeks after prostate brachytherapy using [Formula: see text] seeds. Image features used for the stage 1 parallelization were seed trains in CT and needle tracks and seed voids in MR. Simulated datasets were also created to further investigate algorithm performance. Clinical image volumes were successfully registered using the two‐stage approach to within a root‐mean‐squares (RMS) distance of <1.5 mm, provided that some pubic bone and anterior rectum were included in the registration volume of interest and that no motion artifact was apparent. This level of accuracy is comparable to that obtained for the same clinical datasets using the Procrustes algorithm. Unlike Procrustes, the new algorithm can be almost fully automated, and hence we conclude that its further development for application in post‐implant dosimetry is warranted. PACS numbers: 87.53.Jw, 87.57.Gg, 87.59.Fm, 87.61.Pk John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2007-02-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5722399/ /pubmed/17592452 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v8i1.2351 Text en © 2007 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Radiation Oncology Physics Vidakovic, Sandra Jans, Hans S. Alexander, Abe Sloboda, Ron S. Post‐implant computed tomography–magnetic resonance prostate image registration using feature line parallelization and normalized mutual information |
title | Post‐implant computed tomography–magnetic resonance prostate image registration using feature line parallelization and normalized mutual information |
title_full | Post‐implant computed tomography–magnetic resonance prostate image registration using feature line parallelization and normalized mutual information |
title_fullStr | Post‐implant computed tomography–magnetic resonance prostate image registration using feature line parallelization and normalized mutual information |
title_full_unstemmed | Post‐implant computed tomography–magnetic resonance prostate image registration using feature line parallelization and normalized mutual information |
title_short | Post‐implant computed tomography–magnetic resonance prostate image registration using feature line parallelization and normalized mutual information |
title_sort | post‐implant computed tomography–magnetic resonance prostate image registration using feature line parallelization and normalized mutual information |
topic | Radiation Oncology Physics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5722399/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17592452 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v8i1.2351 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vidakovicsandra postimplantcomputedtomographymagneticresonanceprostateimageregistrationusingfeaturelineparallelizationandnormalizedmutualinformation AT janshanss postimplantcomputedtomographymagneticresonanceprostateimageregistrationusingfeaturelineparallelizationandnormalizedmutualinformation AT alexanderabe postimplantcomputedtomographymagneticresonanceprostateimageregistrationusingfeaturelineparallelizationandnormalizedmutualinformation AT slobodarons postimplantcomputedtomographymagneticresonanceprostateimageregistrationusingfeaturelineparallelizationandnormalizedmutualinformation |