Cargando…

Post‐implant computed tomography–magnetic resonance prostate image registration using feature line parallelization and normalized mutual information

Post‐implant dosimetry for permanent prostate brachytherapy is typically performed using computed tomography (CT) images, for which the clear visualization of soft tissue structures is problematic. Registration of CT and magnetic resonance (MR) image volumes can improve the definition of all structu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vidakovic, Sandra, Jans, Hans S., Alexander, Abe, Sloboda, Ron S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5722399/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17592452
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v8i1.2351
_version_ 1783285004784107520
author Vidakovic, Sandra
Jans, Hans S.
Alexander, Abe
Sloboda, Ron S.
author_facet Vidakovic, Sandra
Jans, Hans S.
Alexander, Abe
Sloboda, Ron S.
author_sort Vidakovic, Sandra
collection PubMed
description Post‐implant dosimetry for permanent prostate brachytherapy is typically performed using computed tomography (CT) images, for which the clear visualization of soft tissue structures is problematic. Registration of CT and magnetic resonance (MR) image volumes can improve the definition of all structures of interest (soft tissues, bones, and seeds) in the joint image set. In the present paper, we describe a novel two‐stage rigid‐body registration algorithm that consists of (1) parallelization of straight lines fit to image features running primarily in the superior–inferior (Z) direction, followed by (2) normalized mutual information registration. The first stage serves to fix rotation angles about the anterior–posterior (Y) and left–right (X) directions, and the second stage determines the remaining Z‐axis rotation angle and the X, Y, Z translation values. The new algorithm was applied to CT and 1.5T MR (T2‐weighted and balanced fast‐field echo sequences) axial image sets for three patients acquired four weeks after prostate brachytherapy using [Formula: see text] seeds. Image features used for the stage 1 parallelization were seed trains in CT and needle tracks and seed voids in MR. Simulated datasets were also created to further investigate algorithm performance. Clinical image volumes were successfully registered using the two‐stage approach to within a root‐mean‐squares (RMS) distance of <1.5 mm, provided that some pubic bone and anterior rectum were included in the registration volume of interest and that no motion artifact was apparent. This level of accuracy is comparable to that obtained for the same clinical datasets using the Procrustes algorithm. Unlike Procrustes, the new algorithm can be almost fully automated, and hence we conclude that its further development for application in post‐implant dosimetry is warranted. PACS numbers: 87.53.Jw, 87.57.Gg, 87.59.Fm, 87.61.Pk
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5722399
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57223992018-04-02 Post‐implant computed tomography–magnetic resonance prostate image registration using feature line parallelization and normalized mutual information Vidakovic, Sandra Jans, Hans S. Alexander, Abe Sloboda, Ron S. J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics Post‐implant dosimetry for permanent prostate brachytherapy is typically performed using computed tomography (CT) images, for which the clear visualization of soft tissue structures is problematic. Registration of CT and magnetic resonance (MR) image volumes can improve the definition of all structures of interest (soft tissues, bones, and seeds) in the joint image set. In the present paper, we describe a novel two‐stage rigid‐body registration algorithm that consists of (1) parallelization of straight lines fit to image features running primarily in the superior–inferior (Z) direction, followed by (2) normalized mutual information registration. The first stage serves to fix rotation angles about the anterior–posterior (Y) and left–right (X) directions, and the second stage determines the remaining Z‐axis rotation angle and the X, Y, Z translation values. The new algorithm was applied to CT and 1.5T MR (T2‐weighted and balanced fast‐field echo sequences) axial image sets for three patients acquired four weeks after prostate brachytherapy using [Formula: see text] seeds. Image features used for the stage 1 parallelization were seed trains in CT and needle tracks and seed voids in MR. Simulated datasets were also created to further investigate algorithm performance. Clinical image volumes were successfully registered using the two‐stage approach to within a root‐mean‐squares (RMS) distance of <1.5 mm, provided that some pubic bone and anterior rectum were included in the registration volume of interest and that no motion artifact was apparent. This level of accuracy is comparable to that obtained for the same clinical datasets using the Procrustes algorithm. Unlike Procrustes, the new algorithm can be almost fully automated, and hence we conclude that its further development for application in post‐implant dosimetry is warranted. PACS numbers: 87.53.Jw, 87.57.Gg, 87.59.Fm, 87.61.Pk John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2007-02-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5722399/ /pubmed/17592452 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v8i1.2351 Text en © 2007 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Vidakovic, Sandra
Jans, Hans S.
Alexander, Abe
Sloboda, Ron S.
Post‐implant computed tomography–magnetic resonance prostate image registration using feature line parallelization and normalized mutual information
title Post‐implant computed tomography–magnetic resonance prostate image registration using feature line parallelization and normalized mutual information
title_full Post‐implant computed tomography–magnetic resonance prostate image registration using feature line parallelization and normalized mutual information
title_fullStr Post‐implant computed tomography–magnetic resonance prostate image registration using feature line parallelization and normalized mutual information
title_full_unstemmed Post‐implant computed tomography–magnetic resonance prostate image registration using feature line parallelization and normalized mutual information
title_short Post‐implant computed tomography–magnetic resonance prostate image registration using feature line parallelization and normalized mutual information
title_sort post‐implant computed tomography–magnetic resonance prostate image registration using feature line parallelization and normalized mutual information
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5722399/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17592452
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v8i1.2351
work_keys_str_mv AT vidakovicsandra postimplantcomputedtomographymagneticresonanceprostateimageregistrationusingfeaturelineparallelizationandnormalizedmutualinformation
AT janshanss postimplantcomputedtomographymagneticresonanceprostateimageregistrationusingfeaturelineparallelizationandnormalizedmutualinformation
AT alexanderabe postimplantcomputedtomographymagneticresonanceprostateimageregistrationusingfeaturelineparallelizationandnormalizedmutualinformation
AT slobodarons postimplantcomputedtomographymagneticresonanceprostateimageregistrationusingfeaturelineparallelizationandnormalizedmutualinformation