Cargando…

Comparison of three image segmentation techniques for target volume delineation in positron emission tomography

Incorporation of positron emission tomography (PET) data into radiotherapy planning is currently under investigation for numerous sites including lung, brain, head and neck, breast, and prostate. Accurate tumor‐volume quantification is essential to the proper utilization of the unique information pr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Drever, Laura, Roa, Wilson, McEwan, Alexander, Robinson, Don
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5722408/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17592458
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v8i2.2367
_version_ 1783285007033303040
author Drever, Laura
Roa, Wilson
McEwan, Alexander
Robinson, Don
author_facet Drever, Laura
Roa, Wilson
McEwan, Alexander
Robinson, Don
author_sort Drever, Laura
collection PubMed
description Incorporation of positron emission tomography (PET) data into radiotherapy planning is currently under investigation for numerous sites including lung, brain, head and neck, breast, and prostate. Accurate tumor‐volume quantification is essential to the proper utilization of the unique information provided by PET. Unfortunately, target delineation within PET currently remains a largely unaddressed problem. We therefore examined the ability of three segmentation methods—thresholding, Sobel edge detection, and the watershed approach—to yield accurate delineation of PET target cross‐sections. A phantom study employing well‐defined cylindrical and spherical volumes and activity distributions provided an opportunity to assess the relative efficacy with which the three approaches could yield accurate target delineation in PET. Results revealed that threshold segmentation can accurately delineate target cross‐sections, but that the Sobel and watershed techniques both consistently fail to correctly identify the size of experimental volumes. The usefulness of threshold‐based segmentation is limited, however, by the dependence of the correct threshold (that which returns the correct area at each image slice) on target size. PACS numbers: 87.58.Fg, 87.57.Nk
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5722408
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57224082018-04-02 Comparison of three image segmentation techniques for target volume delineation in positron emission tomography Drever, Laura Roa, Wilson McEwan, Alexander Robinson, Don J Appl Clin Med Phys Medical Imaging Incorporation of positron emission tomography (PET) data into radiotherapy planning is currently under investigation for numerous sites including lung, brain, head and neck, breast, and prostate. Accurate tumor‐volume quantification is essential to the proper utilization of the unique information provided by PET. Unfortunately, target delineation within PET currently remains a largely unaddressed problem. We therefore examined the ability of three segmentation methods—thresholding, Sobel edge detection, and the watershed approach—to yield accurate delineation of PET target cross‐sections. A phantom study employing well‐defined cylindrical and spherical volumes and activity distributions provided an opportunity to assess the relative efficacy with which the three approaches could yield accurate target delineation in PET. Results revealed that threshold segmentation can accurately delineate target cross‐sections, but that the Sobel and watershed techniques both consistently fail to correctly identify the size of experimental volumes. The usefulness of threshold‐based segmentation is limited, however, by the dependence of the correct threshold (that which returns the correct area at each image slice) on target size. PACS numbers: 87.58.Fg, 87.57.Nk John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2007-03-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5722408/ /pubmed/17592458 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v8i2.2367 Text en © 2007 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Medical Imaging
Drever, Laura
Roa, Wilson
McEwan, Alexander
Robinson, Don
Comparison of three image segmentation techniques for target volume delineation in positron emission tomography
title Comparison of three image segmentation techniques for target volume delineation in positron emission tomography
title_full Comparison of three image segmentation techniques for target volume delineation in positron emission tomography
title_fullStr Comparison of three image segmentation techniques for target volume delineation in positron emission tomography
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of three image segmentation techniques for target volume delineation in positron emission tomography
title_short Comparison of three image segmentation techniques for target volume delineation in positron emission tomography
title_sort comparison of three image segmentation techniques for target volume delineation in positron emission tomography
topic Medical Imaging
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5722408/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17592458
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v8i2.2367
work_keys_str_mv AT dreverlaura comparisonofthreeimagesegmentationtechniquesfortargetvolumedelineationinpositronemissiontomography
AT roawilson comparisonofthreeimagesegmentationtechniquesfortargetvolumedelineationinpositronemissiontomography
AT mcewanalexander comparisonofthreeimagesegmentationtechniquesfortargetvolumedelineationinpositronemissiontomography
AT robinsondon comparisonofthreeimagesegmentationtechniquesfortargetvolumedelineationinpositronemissiontomography