Cargando…

Study of the influence of phantom material and size on the calibration of ionization chambers in terms of absorbed dose to water

In the International Atomic Energy Agency's (IAEA) code of practice (TRS 398) and the American Association of Physicists in Medicine's dosimetry protocol (TG‐51), full‐scatter water phantoms are recommended for the determination of the absorbed dose for both photon and electron beams and,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Arib, Mehenna, Medjadj, Toufik, Boudouma, Youcef
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2006
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5722429/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17533342
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v7i3.2264
Descripción
Sumario:In the International Atomic Energy Agency's (IAEA) code of practice (TRS 398) and the American Association of Physicists in Medicine's dosimetry protocol (TG‐51), full‐scatter water phantoms are recommended for the determination of the absorbed dose for both photon and electron beams and, consequently, for the calibration of the user's ionization chambers. This procedure is applied in the Secondary Standard Dosimetry Laboratory, where the calibration is performed on a [Formula: see text] gamma beam, in comparison with reference chambers whose absorbed dose‐to‐water calibration coefficients, [Formula: see text] , are known. In this work, we present the results of the calibration of 10 Farmer‐like ionization chambers calibrated in three water phantoms (sizes [Formula: see text] , [Formula: see text] , and [Formula: see text]) and two plastic phantoms (size [Formula: see text]) polymethyl methacrlyate (PMMA) and polystyrene). Calibrations are performed by the substitution method using an ionization chamber whose [Formula: see text] has been supplied by the IAEA's reference laboratory. It is shown that the results, expressed as the percentage ratio of the calibration coefficient in a given phantom to that of the standard IAEA phantom, is less than 0.35% for all investigated chambers, and that the standard deviation of the mean of the [Formula: see text] calibration coefficients determined in all five phantoms is less than 0.06%, except for one nylon‐walled ionization chamber, where the observed 0.34% value could be explained by the hygroscopic properties of nylon. Furthermore, a chamber‐to‐chamber dependence of the calibration coefficient has been shown to vary by up to 2.8%. These results emphasize that the phantom dimensions and its material are not sensitive criteria for the calibration of cylindrical ionization chambers in terms of absorbed dose to water. The results also show that generic calibration coefficients could not be considered for a given type of chamber. PACS number: 87.53.Dq