Cargando…

Out‐of‐field dosimetry measurements for a helical tomotherapy system

Helical tomotherapy is a rotational delivery technique that uses intensity‐modulated fan beams to deliver highly conformal intensity‐modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). The beam‐on time needed to deliver a given prescribed dose can be up to 15 times longer than that needed using conventional treatme...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ramsey, Chester R., Seibert, Rebecca, Mahan, Stephen L., Desai, Dharmin, Chase, Daniel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2006
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5722430/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17533339
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v7i3.2212
_version_ 1783285012523646976
author Ramsey, Chester R.
Seibert, Rebecca
Mahan, Stephen L.
Desai, Dharmin
Chase, Daniel
author_facet Ramsey, Chester R.
Seibert, Rebecca
Mahan, Stephen L.
Desai, Dharmin
Chase, Daniel
author_sort Ramsey, Chester R.
collection PubMed
description Helical tomotherapy is a rotational delivery technique that uses intensity‐modulated fan beams to deliver highly conformal intensity‐modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). The beam‐on time needed to deliver a given prescribed dose can be up to 15 times longer than that needed using conventional treatment delivery. As such, there is concern that this delivery technique has the potential to increase the whole body dose due to increased leakage. The purpose of this work is to directly measure out‐of‐field doses for a clinical tomotherapy system. Peripheral doses were measured in‐phantom using static fields and rotational intensity‐modulated delivery. In‐air scatter and leakage doses were also measured at multiple locations around the treatment room. At 20 cm, the tomotherapy peripheral dose dropped to 0.4% of the prescribed dose. Leakage accounted for 94% of the in‐air dose at distances greater than 60 cm from the machine's isocenter. The largest measured dose equivalent rate was [Formula: see text] Sv/s in the plane of gantry rotation due to head leakage and primary beam transmission through the system's beam stopper. The dose equivalent rate dropped to [Formula: see text] Sv/s at the end of the treatment couch. Even though helical tomotherapy treatment delivery requires beam‐on times that are 5 to 15 times longer than those used by conventional accelerators, the delivery system was designed to maximize shielding for radiation leakage. As such, the peripheral doses are equal to or less than the published peripheral doses for IMRT delivery on other linear accelerators. In addition, the shielding requirements are also similar to conventional linear accelerators. PACS number: 87.53.Dq
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5722430
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2006
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57224302018-04-02 Out‐of‐field dosimetry measurements for a helical tomotherapy system Ramsey, Chester R. Seibert, Rebecca Mahan, Stephen L. Desai, Dharmin Chase, Daniel J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics Helical tomotherapy is a rotational delivery technique that uses intensity‐modulated fan beams to deliver highly conformal intensity‐modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). The beam‐on time needed to deliver a given prescribed dose can be up to 15 times longer than that needed using conventional treatment delivery. As such, there is concern that this delivery technique has the potential to increase the whole body dose due to increased leakage. The purpose of this work is to directly measure out‐of‐field doses for a clinical tomotherapy system. Peripheral doses were measured in‐phantom using static fields and rotational intensity‐modulated delivery. In‐air scatter and leakage doses were also measured at multiple locations around the treatment room. At 20 cm, the tomotherapy peripheral dose dropped to 0.4% of the prescribed dose. Leakage accounted for 94% of the in‐air dose at distances greater than 60 cm from the machine's isocenter. The largest measured dose equivalent rate was [Formula: see text] Sv/s in the plane of gantry rotation due to head leakage and primary beam transmission through the system's beam stopper. The dose equivalent rate dropped to [Formula: see text] Sv/s at the end of the treatment couch. Even though helical tomotherapy treatment delivery requires beam‐on times that are 5 to 15 times longer than those used by conventional accelerators, the delivery system was designed to maximize shielding for radiation leakage. As such, the peripheral doses are equal to or less than the published peripheral doses for IMRT delivery on other linear accelerators. In addition, the shielding requirements are also similar to conventional linear accelerators. PACS number: 87.53.Dq John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2006-08-24 /pmc/articles/PMC5722430/ /pubmed/17533339 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v7i3.2212 Text en © 2006 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Ramsey, Chester R.
Seibert, Rebecca
Mahan, Stephen L.
Desai, Dharmin
Chase, Daniel
Out‐of‐field dosimetry measurements for a helical tomotherapy system
title Out‐of‐field dosimetry measurements for a helical tomotherapy system
title_full Out‐of‐field dosimetry measurements for a helical tomotherapy system
title_fullStr Out‐of‐field dosimetry measurements for a helical tomotherapy system
title_full_unstemmed Out‐of‐field dosimetry measurements for a helical tomotherapy system
title_short Out‐of‐field dosimetry measurements for a helical tomotherapy system
title_sort out‐of‐field dosimetry measurements for a helical tomotherapy system
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5722430/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17533339
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v7i3.2212
work_keys_str_mv AT ramseychesterr outoffielddosimetrymeasurementsforahelicaltomotherapysystem
AT seibertrebecca outoffielddosimetrymeasurementsforahelicaltomotherapysystem
AT mahanstephenl outoffielddosimetrymeasurementsforahelicaltomotherapysystem
AT desaidharmin outoffielddosimetrymeasurementsforahelicaltomotherapysystem
AT chasedaniel outoffielddosimetrymeasurementsforahelicaltomotherapysystem