Cargando…
Out‐of‐field dosimetry measurements for a helical tomotherapy system
Helical tomotherapy is a rotational delivery technique that uses intensity‐modulated fan beams to deliver highly conformal intensity‐modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). The beam‐on time needed to deliver a given prescribed dose can be up to 15 times longer than that needed using conventional treatme...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2006
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5722430/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17533339 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v7i3.2212 |
_version_ | 1783285012523646976 |
---|---|
author | Ramsey, Chester R. Seibert, Rebecca Mahan, Stephen L. Desai, Dharmin Chase, Daniel |
author_facet | Ramsey, Chester R. Seibert, Rebecca Mahan, Stephen L. Desai, Dharmin Chase, Daniel |
author_sort | Ramsey, Chester R. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Helical tomotherapy is a rotational delivery technique that uses intensity‐modulated fan beams to deliver highly conformal intensity‐modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). The beam‐on time needed to deliver a given prescribed dose can be up to 15 times longer than that needed using conventional treatment delivery. As such, there is concern that this delivery technique has the potential to increase the whole body dose due to increased leakage. The purpose of this work is to directly measure out‐of‐field doses for a clinical tomotherapy system. Peripheral doses were measured in‐phantom using static fields and rotational intensity‐modulated delivery. In‐air scatter and leakage doses were also measured at multiple locations around the treatment room. At 20 cm, the tomotherapy peripheral dose dropped to 0.4% of the prescribed dose. Leakage accounted for 94% of the in‐air dose at distances greater than 60 cm from the machine's isocenter. The largest measured dose equivalent rate was [Formula: see text] Sv/s in the plane of gantry rotation due to head leakage and primary beam transmission through the system's beam stopper. The dose equivalent rate dropped to [Formula: see text] Sv/s at the end of the treatment couch. Even though helical tomotherapy treatment delivery requires beam‐on times that are 5 to 15 times longer than those used by conventional accelerators, the delivery system was designed to maximize shielding for radiation leakage. As such, the peripheral doses are equal to or less than the published peripheral doses for IMRT delivery on other linear accelerators. In addition, the shielding requirements are also similar to conventional linear accelerators. PACS number: 87.53.Dq |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5722430 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2006 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57224302018-04-02 Out‐of‐field dosimetry measurements for a helical tomotherapy system Ramsey, Chester R. Seibert, Rebecca Mahan, Stephen L. Desai, Dharmin Chase, Daniel J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics Helical tomotherapy is a rotational delivery technique that uses intensity‐modulated fan beams to deliver highly conformal intensity‐modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). The beam‐on time needed to deliver a given prescribed dose can be up to 15 times longer than that needed using conventional treatment delivery. As such, there is concern that this delivery technique has the potential to increase the whole body dose due to increased leakage. The purpose of this work is to directly measure out‐of‐field doses for a clinical tomotherapy system. Peripheral doses were measured in‐phantom using static fields and rotational intensity‐modulated delivery. In‐air scatter and leakage doses were also measured at multiple locations around the treatment room. At 20 cm, the tomotherapy peripheral dose dropped to 0.4% of the prescribed dose. Leakage accounted for 94% of the in‐air dose at distances greater than 60 cm from the machine's isocenter. The largest measured dose equivalent rate was [Formula: see text] Sv/s in the plane of gantry rotation due to head leakage and primary beam transmission through the system's beam stopper. The dose equivalent rate dropped to [Formula: see text] Sv/s at the end of the treatment couch. Even though helical tomotherapy treatment delivery requires beam‐on times that are 5 to 15 times longer than those used by conventional accelerators, the delivery system was designed to maximize shielding for radiation leakage. As such, the peripheral doses are equal to or less than the published peripheral doses for IMRT delivery on other linear accelerators. In addition, the shielding requirements are also similar to conventional linear accelerators. PACS number: 87.53.Dq John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2006-08-24 /pmc/articles/PMC5722430/ /pubmed/17533339 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v7i3.2212 Text en © 2006 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Radiation Oncology Physics Ramsey, Chester R. Seibert, Rebecca Mahan, Stephen L. Desai, Dharmin Chase, Daniel Out‐of‐field dosimetry measurements for a helical tomotherapy system |
title | Out‐of‐field dosimetry measurements for a helical tomotherapy system
|
title_full | Out‐of‐field dosimetry measurements for a helical tomotherapy system
|
title_fullStr | Out‐of‐field dosimetry measurements for a helical tomotherapy system
|
title_full_unstemmed | Out‐of‐field dosimetry measurements for a helical tomotherapy system
|
title_short | Out‐of‐field dosimetry measurements for a helical tomotherapy system
|
title_sort | out‐of‐field dosimetry measurements for a helical tomotherapy system |
topic | Radiation Oncology Physics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5722430/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17533339 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v7i3.2212 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ramseychesterr outoffielddosimetrymeasurementsforahelicaltomotherapysystem AT seibertrebecca outoffielddosimetrymeasurementsforahelicaltomotherapysystem AT mahanstephenl outoffielddosimetrymeasurementsforahelicaltomotherapysystem AT desaidharmin outoffielddosimetrymeasurementsforahelicaltomotherapysystem AT chasedaniel outoffielddosimetrymeasurementsforahelicaltomotherapysystem |