Cargando…
Dose modification factors for (192)Ir high‐dose‐rate irradiation using Monte Carlo simulations
A recently introduced brachytherapy system for partial breast irradiation, MammoSite, consists of a balloon applicator filled with contrast solution and a catheter for insertion of an [Formula: see text] high‐dose‐rate (HDR) source. In using this system, the treatment dose is typically prescribed to...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2006
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5722431/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17533345 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v7i3.2293 |
_version_ | 1783285012760625152 |
---|---|
author | Kassas, Bassel Mourtada, Firas Horton, John L. Lane, Richard G. Buchholz, Thomas A. Strom, Eric A. |
author_facet | Kassas, Bassel Mourtada, Firas Horton, John L. Lane, Richard G. Buchholz, Thomas A. Strom, Eric A. |
author_sort | Kassas, Bassel |
collection | PubMed |
description | A recently introduced brachytherapy system for partial breast irradiation, MammoSite, consists of a balloon applicator filled with contrast solution and a catheter for insertion of an [Formula: see text] high‐dose‐rate (HDR) source. In using this system, the treatment dose is typically prescribed to be delivered 1 cm from the balloon's surface. Most treatment‐planning systems currently in use for brachytherapy procedures use water‐based dosimetry with no correction for heterogeneity. Therefore, these systems assume that full scatter exists regardless of the amount of tissue beyond the prescription line. This assumption might not be a reasonable one, especially when the tissue beyond the prescription line is thin. In such a case, the resulting limited scatter could cause an underdose to be delivered along the prescription line. We used Monte Carlo simulations to investigate how the thickness of the tissue between the surface of the balloon and the skin or lung affected the treatment dose delivery. Calculations were based on a spherical water phantom with a diameter of 30 cm and balloons with diameters of 4 cm, 5 cm, and 6 cm. The dose modification factor is defined as the ratio of the dose rate at the typical prescription distance of 1 cm from the balloon's surface with full scatter obtained using the water phantom to the dose rate with a finite tissue thickness (from 0 cm to 10 cm) beyond the prescription line. The dose modification factor was found to be dependent on the balloon diameter and was 1.098 for the 4‐cm balloon and 1.132 for the 6‐cm balloon with no tissue beyond the prescription distance at the breast–skin interface. The dose modification factor at the breast–lung interface was 1.067 for the 4‐cm balloon and 1.096 for the 6‐cm balloon. Even 5 cm of tissue beyond the prescription distance could not result in full scatter. Thus, we found that considering the effect of diminished scatter is important to accurate dosimetry. Not accounting for the dose modification factor may result in delivering a lower dose than is prescribed. PACS number: 87.53.Jw |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5722431 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2006 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57224312018-04-02 Dose modification factors for (192)Ir high‐dose‐rate irradiation using Monte Carlo simulations Kassas, Bassel Mourtada, Firas Horton, John L. Lane, Richard G. Buchholz, Thomas A. Strom, Eric A. J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics A recently introduced brachytherapy system for partial breast irradiation, MammoSite, consists of a balloon applicator filled with contrast solution and a catheter for insertion of an [Formula: see text] high‐dose‐rate (HDR) source. In using this system, the treatment dose is typically prescribed to be delivered 1 cm from the balloon's surface. Most treatment‐planning systems currently in use for brachytherapy procedures use water‐based dosimetry with no correction for heterogeneity. Therefore, these systems assume that full scatter exists regardless of the amount of tissue beyond the prescription line. This assumption might not be a reasonable one, especially when the tissue beyond the prescription line is thin. In such a case, the resulting limited scatter could cause an underdose to be delivered along the prescription line. We used Monte Carlo simulations to investigate how the thickness of the tissue between the surface of the balloon and the skin or lung affected the treatment dose delivery. Calculations were based on a spherical water phantom with a diameter of 30 cm and balloons with diameters of 4 cm, 5 cm, and 6 cm. The dose modification factor is defined as the ratio of the dose rate at the typical prescription distance of 1 cm from the balloon's surface with full scatter obtained using the water phantom to the dose rate with a finite tissue thickness (from 0 cm to 10 cm) beyond the prescription line. The dose modification factor was found to be dependent on the balloon diameter and was 1.098 for the 4‐cm balloon and 1.132 for the 6‐cm balloon with no tissue beyond the prescription distance at the breast–skin interface. The dose modification factor at the breast–lung interface was 1.067 for the 4‐cm balloon and 1.096 for the 6‐cm balloon. Even 5 cm of tissue beyond the prescription distance could not result in full scatter. Thus, we found that considering the effect of diminished scatter is important to accurate dosimetry. Not accounting for the dose modification factor may result in delivering a lower dose than is prescribed. PACS number: 87.53.Jw John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2006-08-24 /pmc/articles/PMC5722431/ /pubmed/17533345 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v7i3.2293 Text en © 2006 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Radiation Oncology Physics Kassas, Bassel Mourtada, Firas Horton, John L. Lane, Richard G. Buchholz, Thomas A. Strom, Eric A. Dose modification factors for (192)Ir high‐dose‐rate irradiation using Monte Carlo simulations |
title | Dose modification factors for (192)Ir high‐dose‐rate irradiation using Monte Carlo simulations |
title_full | Dose modification factors for (192)Ir high‐dose‐rate irradiation using Monte Carlo simulations |
title_fullStr | Dose modification factors for (192)Ir high‐dose‐rate irradiation using Monte Carlo simulations |
title_full_unstemmed | Dose modification factors for (192)Ir high‐dose‐rate irradiation using Monte Carlo simulations |
title_short | Dose modification factors for (192)Ir high‐dose‐rate irradiation using Monte Carlo simulations |
title_sort | dose modification factors for (192)ir high‐dose‐rate irradiation using monte carlo simulations |
topic | Radiation Oncology Physics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5722431/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17533345 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v7i3.2293 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kassasbassel dosemodificationfactorsfor192irhighdoserateirradiationusingmontecarlosimulations AT mourtadafiras dosemodificationfactorsfor192irhighdoserateirradiationusingmontecarlosimulations AT hortonjohnl dosemodificationfactorsfor192irhighdoserateirradiationusingmontecarlosimulations AT lanerichardg dosemodificationfactorsfor192irhighdoserateirradiationusingmontecarlosimulations AT buchholzthomasa dosemodificationfactorsfor192irhighdoserateirradiationusingmontecarlosimulations AT stromerica dosemodificationfactorsfor192irhighdoserateirradiationusingmontecarlosimulations |