Cargando…

Performance evaluation of an automated image registration algorithm using an integrated kilovoltage imaging and guidance system

Image‐guided radiation therapy delivery may be used to assess the position of the tumor and anatomical structures within the body as opposed to relying on external marks. The purpose of this manuscript is to evaluate the performance of the image registration software for automatically detecting and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fox, Timothy, Huntzinger, Calvin, Johnstone, Peter, Ogunleye, Tomi, Elder, Eric
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2006
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5722475/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16518321
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v7i1.2199
_version_ 1783285019462074368
author Fox, Timothy
Huntzinger, Calvin
Johnstone, Peter
Ogunleye, Tomi
Elder, Eric
author_facet Fox, Timothy
Huntzinger, Calvin
Johnstone, Peter
Ogunleye, Tomi
Elder, Eric
author_sort Fox, Timothy
collection PubMed
description Image‐guided radiation therapy delivery may be used to assess the position of the tumor and anatomical structures within the body as opposed to relying on external marks. The purpose of this manuscript is to evaluate the performance of the image registration software for automatically detecting and repositioning a 3D offset of a phantom using a kilovoltage onboard imaging system. Verification tests were performed on both a geometric rigid phantom and an anthropomorphic head phantom containing a humanoid skeleton to assess the precision and accuracy of the automated positioning system. From the translation only studies, the average deviation between the detected and known offset was less than 0.75 mm for each of the three principal directions, and the shifts did not show any directional sensitivity. The results are given as the measurement with standard deviation in parentheses. The combined translations and rotations had the greatest average deviation in the lateral, longitudinal, and vertical directions. For all dimensions, the magnitude of the deviation does not appear to be correlated with the magnitude of the actual translation introduced. The On‐Board Imager™ (OBI) system has been successfully integrated into a feasible online radiotherapy treatment guidance procedure. Evaluation of each patient's resulting automatch should be performed by therapists before each treatment session for adequate clinical oversight. PACS numbers: 87.53.‐j, 87.53.Xd, 87.57.Gg
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5722475
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2006
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57224752018-04-02 Performance evaluation of an automated image registration algorithm using an integrated kilovoltage imaging and guidance system Fox, Timothy Huntzinger, Calvin Johnstone, Peter Ogunleye, Tomi Elder, Eric J Appl Clin Med Phys Medical Imaging Image‐guided radiation therapy delivery may be used to assess the position of the tumor and anatomical structures within the body as opposed to relying on external marks. The purpose of this manuscript is to evaluate the performance of the image registration software for automatically detecting and repositioning a 3D offset of a phantom using a kilovoltage onboard imaging system. Verification tests were performed on both a geometric rigid phantom and an anthropomorphic head phantom containing a humanoid skeleton to assess the precision and accuracy of the automated positioning system. From the translation only studies, the average deviation between the detected and known offset was less than 0.75 mm for each of the three principal directions, and the shifts did not show any directional sensitivity. The results are given as the measurement with standard deviation in parentheses. The combined translations and rotations had the greatest average deviation in the lateral, longitudinal, and vertical directions. For all dimensions, the magnitude of the deviation does not appear to be correlated with the magnitude of the actual translation introduced. The On‐Board Imager™ (OBI) system has been successfully integrated into a feasible online radiotherapy treatment guidance procedure. Evaluation of each patient's resulting automatch should be performed by therapists before each treatment session for adequate clinical oversight. PACS numbers: 87.53.‐j, 87.53.Xd, 87.57.Gg John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2006-02-21 /pmc/articles/PMC5722475/ /pubmed/16518321 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v7i1.2199 Text en © 2006 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Medical Imaging
Fox, Timothy
Huntzinger, Calvin
Johnstone, Peter
Ogunleye, Tomi
Elder, Eric
Performance evaluation of an automated image registration algorithm using an integrated kilovoltage imaging and guidance system
title Performance evaluation of an automated image registration algorithm using an integrated kilovoltage imaging and guidance system
title_full Performance evaluation of an automated image registration algorithm using an integrated kilovoltage imaging and guidance system
title_fullStr Performance evaluation of an automated image registration algorithm using an integrated kilovoltage imaging and guidance system
title_full_unstemmed Performance evaluation of an automated image registration algorithm using an integrated kilovoltage imaging and guidance system
title_short Performance evaluation of an automated image registration algorithm using an integrated kilovoltage imaging and guidance system
title_sort performance evaluation of an automated image registration algorithm using an integrated kilovoltage imaging and guidance system
topic Medical Imaging
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5722475/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16518321
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v7i1.2199
work_keys_str_mv AT foxtimothy performanceevaluationofanautomatedimageregistrationalgorithmusinganintegratedkilovoltageimagingandguidancesystem
AT huntzingercalvin performanceevaluationofanautomatedimageregistrationalgorithmusinganintegratedkilovoltageimagingandguidancesystem
AT johnstonepeter performanceevaluationofanautomatedimageregistrationalgorithmusinganintegratedkilovoltageimagingandguidancesystem
AT ogunleyetomi performanceevaluationofanautomatedimageregistrationalgorithmusinganintegratedkilovoltageimagingandguidancesystem
AT eldereric performanceevaluationofanautomatedimageregistrationalgorithmusinganintegratedkilovoltageimagingandguidancesystem