Cargando…
Comparing computed tomography localization with daily ultrasound during image‐guided radiation therapy for the treatment of prostate cancer: a prospective evaluation
In the present paper, we describe the results of a prospective trial that compared isocenter shifts produced by BAT Ultrasound (Nomos, Sewicky, PA) to those produced by a computed tomography (CT) unit in the treatment room to aid in positioning during image‐guided radiation therapy. The trial includ...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2007
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5722608/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17712295 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v8i3.2268 |
_version_ | 1783285053511434240 |
---|---|
author | Feigenberg, Steven J. Paskalev, Kamen McNeeley, Shawn Horwitz, Eric M. Konski, Andre Wang, Lu Ma, Charlie Pollack, Alan |
author_facet | Feigenberg, Steven J. Paskalev, Kamen McNeeley, Shawn Horwitz, Eric M. Konski, Andre Wang, Lu Ma, Charlie Pollack, Alan |
author_sort | Feigenberg, Steven J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | In the present paper, we describe the results of a prospective trial that compared isocenter shifts produced by BAT Ultrasound (Nomos, Sewicky, PA) to those produced by a computed tomography (CT) unit in the treatment room to aid in positioning during image‐guided radiation therapy. The trial included 15 consecutive patients with localized prostate cancer. All patients underwent CT and MR simulation immobilized supine in an Alpha Cradle and were treated with intensity‐modulated radiation therapy. BAT Ultrasound was used daily to correct for interfraction motion by obtaining shift in the x, y, and z directions. Two days per week during therapy, CT scans blinded to the ultrasound shifts were obtained and recorded. We analyzed 218 alignments from the 15 patients and observed a high level of correlation between the CT and ultrasound isocenter shifts (correlation coefficients: 0.877 anterior–posterior, 0.842 lateral, and 0.831 superior–inferior). The systematic differences were less than 1 mm, and the random differences were approximately 2 mm. The average absolute differences, including both systemic and random differences, were less than 2 mm in all directions. The isocenter shifts generated by using a CT unit in the treatment room correlate highly with shifts produced by the BAT Ultrasound system. PACS numbers: 87.53, 87.59.fm, 87.63.Df |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5722608 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2007 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57226082018-04-02 Comparing computed tomography localization with daily ultrasound during image‐guided radiation therapy for the treatment of prostate cancer: a prospective evaluation Feigenberg, Steven J. Paskalev, Kamen McNeeley, Shawn Horwitz, Eric M. Konski, Andre Wang, Lu Ma, Charlie Pollack, Alan J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics In the present paper, we describe the results of a prospective trial that compared isocenter shifts produced by BAT Ultrasound (Nomos, Sewicky, PA) to those produced by a computed tomography (CT) unit in the treatment room to aid in positioning during image‐guided radiation therapy. The trial included 15 consecutive patients with localized prostate cancer. All patients underwent CT and MR simulation immobilized supine in an Alpha Cradle and were treated with intensity‐modulated radiation therapy. BAT Ultrasound was used daily to correct for interfraction motion by obtaining shift in the x, y, and z directions. Two days per week during therapy, CT scans blinded to the ultrasound shifts were obtained and recorded. We analyzed 218 alignments from the 15 patients and observed a high level of correlation between the CT and ultrasound isocenter shifts (correlation coefficients: 0.877 anterior–posterior, 0.842 lateral, and 0.831 superior–inferior). The systematic differences were less than 1 mm, and the random differences were approximately 2 mm. The average absolute differences, including both systemic and random differences, were less than 2 mm in all directions. The isocenter shifts generated by using a CT unit in the treatment room correlate highly with shifts produced by the BAT Ultrasound system. PACS numbers: 87.53, 87.59.fm, 87.63.Df John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2007-07-23 /pmc/articles/PMC5722608/ /pubmed/17712295 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v8i3.2268 Text en © 2007 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Radiation Oncology Physics Feigenberg, Steven J. Paskalev, Kamen McNeeley, Shawn Horwitz, Eric M. Konski, Andre Wang, Lu Ma, Charlie Pollack, Alan Comparing computed tomography localization with daily ultrasound during image‐guided radiation therapy for the treatment of prostate cancer: a prospective evaluation |
title | Comparing computed tomography localization with daily ultrasound during image‐guided radiation therapy for the treatment of prostate cancer: a prospective evaluation |
title_full | Comparing computed tomography localization with daily ultrasound during image‐guided radiation therapy for the treatment of prostate cancer: a prospective evaluation |
title_fullStr | Comparing computed tomography localization with daily ultrasound during image‐guided radiation therapy for the treatment of prostate cancer: a prospective evaluation |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparing computed tomography localization with daily ultrasound during image‐guided radiation therapy for the treatment of prostate cancer: a prospective evaluation |
title_short | Comparing computed tomography localization with daily ultrasound during image‐guided radiation therapy for the treatment of prostate cancer: a prospective evaluation |
title_sort | comparing computed tomography localization with daily ultrasound during image‐guided radiation therapy for the treatment of prostate cancer: a prospective evaluation |
topic | Radiation Oncology Physics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5722608/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17712295 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v8i3.2268 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT feigenbergstevenj comparingcomputedtomographylocalizationwithdailyultrasoundduringimageguidedradiationtherapyforthetreatmentofprostatecanceraprospectiveevaluation AT paskalevkamen comparingcomputedtomographylocalizationwithdailyultrasoundduringimageguidedradiationtherapyforthetreatmentofprostatecanceraprospectiveevaluation AT mcneeleyshawn comparingcomputedtomographylocalizationwithdailyultrasoundduringimageguidedradiationtherapyforthetreatmentofprostatecanceraprospectiveevaluation AT horwitzericm comparingcomputedtomographylocalizationwithdailyultrasoundduringimageguidedradiationtherapyforthetreatmentofprostatecanceraprospectiveevaluation AT konskiandre comparingcomputedtomographylocalizationwithdailyultrasoundduringimageguidedradiationtherapyforthetreatmentofprostatecanceraprospectiveevaluation AT wanglu comparingcomputedtomographylocalizationwithdailyultrasoundduringimageguidedradiationtherapyforthetreatmentofprostatecanceraprospectiveevaluation AT macharlie comparingcomputedtomographylocalizationwithdailyultrasoundduringimageguidedradiationtherapyforthetreatmentofprostatecanceraprospectiveevaluation AT pollackalan comparingcomputedtomographylocalizationwithdailyultrasoundduringimageguidedradiationtherapyforthetreatmentofprostatecanceraprospectiveevaluation |