Cargando…

Comparing computed tomography localization with daily ultrasound during image‐guided radiation therapy for the treatment of prostate cancer: a prospective evaluation

In the present paper, we describe the results of a prospective trial that compared isocenter shifts produced by BAT Ultrasound (Nomos, Sewicky, PA) to those produced by a computed tomography (CT) unit in the treatment room to aid in positioning during image‐guided radiation therapy. The trial includ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Feigenberg, Steven J., Paskalev, Kamen, McNeeley, Shawn, Horwitz, Eric M., Konski, Andre, Wang, Lu, Ma, Charlie, Pollack, Alan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5722608/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17712295
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v8i3.2268
_version_ 1783285053511434240
author Feigenberg, Steven J.
Paskalev, Kamen
McNeeley, Shawn
Horwitz, Eric M.
Konski, Andre
Wang, Lu
Ma, Charlie
Pollack, Alan
author_facet Feigenberg, Steven J.
Paskalev, Kamen
McNeeley, Shawn
Horwitz, Eric M.
Konski, Andre
Wang, Lu
Ma, Charlie
Pollack, Alan
author_sort Feigenberg, Steven J.
collection PubMed
description In the present paper, we describe the results of a prospective trial that compared isocenter shifts produced by BAT Ultrasound (Nomos, Sewicky, PA) to those produced by a computed tomography (CT) unit in the treatment room to aid in positioning during image‐guided radiation therapy. The trial included 15 consecutive patients with localized prostate cancer. All patients underwent CT and MR simulation immobilized supine in an Alpha Cradle and were treated with intensity‐modulated radiation therapy. BAT Ultrasound was used daily to correct for interfraction motion by obtaining shift in the x, y, and z directions. Two days per week during therapy, CT scans blinded to the ultrasound shifts were obtained and recorded. We analyzed 218 alignments from the 15 patients and observed a high level of correlation between the CT and ultrasound isocenter shifts (correlation coefficients: 0.877 anterior–posterior, 0.842 lateral, and 0.831 superior–inferior). The systematic differences were less than 1 mm, and the random differences were approximately 2 mm. The average absolute differences, including both systemic and random differences, were less than 2 mm in all directions. The isocenter shifts generated by using a CT unit in the treatment room correlate highly with shifts produced by the BAT Ultrasound system. PACS numbers: 87.53, 87.59.fm, 87.63.Df
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5722608
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57226082018-04-02 Comparing computed tomography localization with daily ultrasound during image‐guided radiation therapy for the treatment of prostate cancer: a prospective evaluation Feigenberg, Steven J. Paskalev, Kamen McNeeley, Shawn Horwitz, Eric M. Konski, Andre Wang, Lu Ma, Charlie Pollack, Alan J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics In the present paper, we describe the results of a prospective trial that compared isocenter shifts produced by BAT Ultrasound (Nomos, Sewicky, PA) to those produced by a computed tomography (CT) unit in the treatment room to aid in positioning during image‐guided radiation therapy. The trial included 15 consecutive patients with localized prostate cancer. All patients underwent CT and MR simulation immobilized supine in an Alpha Cradle and were treated with intensity‐modulated radiation therapy. BAT Ultrasound was used daily to correct for interfraction motion by obtaining shift in the x, y, and z directions. Two days per week during therapy, CT scans blinded to the ultrasound shifts were obtained and recorded. We analyzed 218 alignments from the 15 patients and observed a high level of correlation between the CT and ultrasound isocenter shifts (correlation coefficients: 0.877 anterior–posterior, 0.842 lateral, and 0.831 superior–inferior). The systematic differences were less than 1 mm, and the random differences were approximately 2 mm. The average absolute differences, including both systemic and random differences, were less than 2 mm in all directions. The isocenter shifts generated by using a CT unit in the treatment room correlate highly with shifts produced by the BAT Ultrasound system. PACS numbers: 87.53, 87.59.fm, 87.63.Df John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2007-07-23 /pmc/articles/PMC5722608/ /pubmed/17712295 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v8i3.2268 Text en © 2007 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Feigenberg, Steven J.
Paskalev, Kamen
McNeeley, Shawn
Horwitz, Eric M.
Konski, Andre
Wang, Lu
Ma, Charlie
Pollack, Alan
Comparing computed tomography localization with daily ultrasound during image‐guided radiation therapy for the treatment of prostate cancer: a prospective evaluation
title Comparing computed tomography localization with daily ultrasound during image‐guided radiation therapy for the treatment of prostate cancer: a prospective evaluation
title_full Comparing computed tomography localization with daily ultrasound during image‐guided radiation therapy for the treatment of prostate cancer: a prospective evaluation
title_fullStr Comparing computed tomography localization with daily ultrasound during image‐guided radiation therapy for the treatment of prostate cancer: a prospective evaluation
title_full_unstemmed Comparing computed tomography localization with daily ultrasound during image‐guided radiation therapy for the treatment of prostate cancer: a prospective evaluation
title_short Comparing computed tomography localization with daily ultrasound during image‐guided radiation therapy for the treatment of prostate cancer: a prospective evaluation
title_sort comparing computed tomography localization with daily ultrasound during image‐guided radiation therapy for the treatment of prostate cancer: a prospective evaluation
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5722608/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17712295
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v8i3.2268
work_keys_str_mv AT feigenbergstevenj comparingcomputedtomographylocalizationwithdailyultrasoundduringimageguidedradiationtherapyforthetreatmentofprostatecanceraprospectiveevaluation
AT paskalevkamen comparingcomputedtomographylocalizationwithdailyultrasoundduringimageguidedradiationtherapyforthetreatmentofprostatecanceraprospectiveevaluation
AT mcneeleyshawn comparingcomputedtomographylocalizationwithdailyultrasoundduringimageguidedradiationtherapyforthetreatmentofprostatecanceraprospectiveevaluation
AT horwitzericm comparingcomputedtomographylocalizationwithdailyultrasoundduringimageguidedradiationtherapyforthetreatmentofprostatecanceraprospectiveevaluation
AT konskiandre comparingcomputedtomographylocalizationwithdailyultrasoundduringimageguidedradiationtherapyforthetreatmentofprostatecanceraprospectiveevaluation
AT wanglu comparingcomputedtomographylocalizationwithdailyultrasoundduringimageguidedradiationtherapyforthetreatmentofprostatecanceraprospectiveevaluation
AT macharlie comparingcomputedtomographylocalizationwithdailyultrasoundduringimageguidedradiationtherapyforthetreatmentofprostatecanceraprospectiveevaluation
AT pollackalan comparingcomputedtomographylocalizationwithdailyultrasoundduringimageguidedradiationtherapyforthetreatmentofprostatecanceraprospectiveevaluation