Cargando…

Determination of depth and field size dependence of multileaf collimator transmission in intensity‐modulated radiation therapy beams

Intensity‐modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) plans for the treatment of large and complex volumes may contain a relatively large contribution from multileaf collimator (MLC) transmission. In such cases, comprehensive characterization of direct and scatter MLC transmission is important. We designed a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zygmanski, Piotr, Rosca, Florin, Kadam, Dnyanesh, Lorenz, Friedlieb, Nalichowski, Adrian, Court, Laurence, Chin, Lee
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5722617/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18449158
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v8i4.2693
_version_ 1783285055882264576
author Zygmanski, Piotr
Rosca, Florin
Kadam, Dnyanesh
Lorenz, Friedlieb
Nalichowski, Adrian
Court, Laurence
Chin, Lee
author_facet Zygmanski, Piotr
Rosca, Florin
Kadam, Dnyanesh
Lorenz, Friedlieb
Nalichowski, Adrian
Court, Laurence
Chin, Lee
author_sort Zygmanski, Piotr
collection PubMed
description Intensity‐modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) plans for the treatment of large and complex volumes may contain a relatively large contribution from multileaf collimator (MLC) transmission. In such cases, comprehensive characterization of direct and scatter MLC transmission is important. We designed a set of tests (open beam, closed static MLC, and dynamic MLC gap) to determine dosimetric MLC properties as a function of field size and depth at the central axis. We developed a generalized model of MLC transmission to account for direct MLC transmission, MLC scatter, beam hardening, and leaf‐end transmission (dosimetric gap). The model is consistent with the beam model used in IMRT optimization. We tested the model for extreme asymmetric fields relevant for large targets and for split IMRT fields. We applied our MLC scatter estimation formula to clinically relevant cases and showed that MLC scatter is contributing an undesired background dose. This contribution is relatively large, especially in low‐dose regions. (For instance, a uniform extra dose may dramatically increase normal‐lung toxicity in thorax treatment.) For complex IMRT of large‐volume targets, we found direct MLC transmission dose to be as high as 30%, and MLC scatter, up to 10% within the target volume for the selected cases. We identified that the dose discrepancies between the IMRT planning system [Eclipse (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA)] and ionization chamber measurements (inside and outside of the field) are attributable to an inadequate model of MLC transmission in the planning system (constant‐value model). In the present study, we measured MLC transmission properties for Varian 6EX (6 MV) and 21EXs (6 and 10 MV) linear accelerators; however, the experimental method and theoretical model are more general. PACS number: 87.53.‐j
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5722617
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57226172018-04-02 Determination of depth and field size dependence of multileaf collimator transmission in intensity‐modulated radiation therapy beams Zygmanski, Piotr Rosca, Florin Kadam, Dnyanesh Lorenz, Friedlieb Nalichowski, Adrian Court, Laurence Chin, Lee J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics Intensity‐modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) plans for the treatment of large and complex volumes may contain a relatively large contribution from multileaf collimator (MLC) transmission. In such cases, comprehensive characterization of direct and scatter MLC transmission is important. We designed a set of tests (open beam, closed static MLC, and dynamic MLC gap) to determine dosimetric MLC properties as a function of field size and depth at the central axis. We developed a generalized model of MLC transmission to account for direct MLC transmission, MLC scatter, beam hardening, and leaf‐end transmission (dosimetric gap). The model is consistent with the beam model used in IMRT optimization. We tested the model for extreme asymmetric fields relevant for large targets and for split IMRT fields. We applied our MLC scatter estimation formula to clinically relevant cases and showed that MLC scatter is contributing an undesired background dose. This contribution is relatively large, especially in low‐dose regions. (For instance, a uniform extra dose may dramatically increase normal‐lung toxicity in thorax treatment.) For complex IMRT of large‐volume targets, we found direct MLC transmission dose to be as high as 30%, and MLC scatter, up to 10% within the target volume for the selected cases. We identified that the dose discrepancies between the IMRT planning system [Eclipse (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA)] and ionization chamber measurements (inside and outside of the field) are attributable to an inadequate model of MLC transmission in the planning system (constant‐value model). In the present study, we measured MLC transmission properties for Varian 6EX (6 MV) and 21EXs (6 and 10 MV) linear accelerators; however, the experimental method and theoretical model are more general. PACS number: 87.53.‐j John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2007-10-24 /pmc/articles/PMC5722617/ /pubmed/18449158 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v8i4.2693 Text en © 2007 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Zygmanski, Piotr
Rosca, Florin
Kadam, Dnyanesh
Lorenz, Friedlieb
Nalichowski, Adrian
Court, Laurence
Chin, Lee
Determination of depth and field size dependence of multileaf collimator transmission in intensity‐modulated radiation therapy beams
title Determination of depth and field size dependence of multileaf collimator transmission in intensity‐modulated radiation therapy beams
title_full Determination of depth and field size dependence of multileaf collimator transmission in intensity‐modulated radiation therapy beams
title_fullStr Determination of depth and field size dependence of multileaf collimator transmission in intensity‐modulated radiation therapy beams
title_full_unstemmed Determination of depth and field size dependence of multileaf collimator transmission in intensity‐modulated radiation therapy beams
title_short Determination of depth and field size dependence of multileaf collimator transmission in intensity‐modulated radiation therapy beams
title_sort determination of depth and field size dependence of multileaf collimator transmission in intensity‐modulated radiation therapy beams
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5722617/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18449158
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v8i4.2693
work_keys_str_mv AT zygmanskipiotr determinationofdepthandfieldsizedependenceofmultileafcollimatortransmissioninintensitymodulatedradiationtherapybeams
AT roscaflorin determinationofdepthandfieldsizedependenceofmultileafcollimatortransmissioninintensitymodulatedradiationtherapybeams
AT kadamdnyanesh determinationofdepthandfieldsizedependenceofmultileafcollimatortransmissioninintensitymodulatedradiationtherapybeams
AT lorenzfriedlieb determinationofdepthandfieldsizedependenceofmultileafcollimatortransmissioninintensitymodulatedradiationtherapybeams
AT nalichowskiadrian determinationofdepthandfieldsizedependenceofmultileafcollimatortransmissioninintensitymodulatedradiationtherapybeams
AT courtlaurence determinationofdepthandfieldsizedependenceofmultileafcollimatortransmissioninintensitymodulatedradiationtherapybeams
AT chinlee determinationofdepthandfieldsizedependenceofmultileafcollimatortransmissioninintensitymodulatedradiationtherapybeams