Cargando…
Multi-criterial evaluation of P-removal optimization in rural wastewater treatment plants for a sub-catchment of the Baltic Sea
Rural wastewater treatment plants (WWTP) are recognized as a significant phosphorous (P)-emission source in the German sub-catchments of the Baltic Sea. But enhancement of P-removal is cost intensive especially for small communities. This study proposes a concept to efficiently reduce P-emissions fr...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Netherlands
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5722745/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29164535 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13280-017-0977-8 |
_version_ | 1783285068183109632 |
---|---|
author | Cramer, Michael Koegst, Tatyana Traenckner, Jens |
author_facet | Cramer, Michael Koegst, Tatyana Traenckner, Jens |
author_sort | Cramer, Michael |
collection | PubMed |
description | Rural wastewater treatment plants (WWTP) are recognized as a significant phosphorous (P)-emission source in the German sub-catchments of the Baltic Sea. But enhancement of P-removal is cost intensive especially for small communities. This study proposes a concept to efficiently reduce P-emissions from WWTP by introducing low-cost non-constructional measures and assessing the resulting change of ambient water quality on a river basin scale. As case study, we choose the Warnow catchment in Mecklenburg-Vorpommern (Germany) where 76 % of WWTP-emissions originate from treatment plants without P-discharge limits. For these facilities, we evaluated two modification options: (1) optimization of enhanced biological Phosphorous removal (EBPR) in activated sludge systems (ASS) and/or (2) chemical precipitation (where EBPR is applicable). The total operational optimization potential in the Warnow catchment is about 20 %. Further improvements can only be applied by a chemical precipitation, with the drawback of increasing the wastewater disposal cost up to 6.5 euros CAP(−1)a(−1). To prioritize relevant plants for improved P-removal we proposed two evaluation criteria: combining absolute emission, and impact on ambient water quality and costs. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s13280-017-0977-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5722745 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Springer Netherlands |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57227452017-12-14 Multi-criterial evaluation of P-removal optimization in rural wastewater treatment plants for a sub-catchment of the Baltic Sea Cramer, Michael Koegst, Tatyana Traenckner, Jens Ambio Article Rural wastewater treatment plants (WWTP) are recognized as a significant phosphorous (P)-emission source in the German sub-catchments of the Baltic Sea. But enhancement of P-removal is cost intensive especially for small communities. This study proposes a concept to efficiently reduce P-emissions from WWTP by introducing low-cost non-constructional measures and assessing the resulting change of ambient water quality on a river basin scale. As case study, we choose the Warnow catchment in Mecklenburg-Vorpommern (Germany) where 76 % of WWTP-emissions originate from treatment plants without P-discharge limits. For these facilities, we evaluated two modification options: (1) optimization of enhanced biological Phosphorous removal (EBPR) in activated sludge systems (ASS) and/or (2) chemical precipitation (where EBPR is applicable). The total operational optimization potential in the Warnow catchment is about 20 %. Further improvements can only be applied by a chemical precipitation, with the drawback of increasing the wastewater disposal cost up to 6.5 euros CAP(−1)a(−1). To prioritize relevant plants for improved P-removal we proposed two evaluation criteria: combining absolute emission, and impact on ambient water quality and costs. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s13280-017-0977-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Netherlands 2017-11-21 2018-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5722745/ /pubmed/29164535 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13280-017-0977-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Article Cramer, Michael Koegst, Tatyana Traenckner, Jens Multi-criterial evaluation of P-removal optimization in rural wastewater treatment plants for a sub-catchment of the Baltic Sea |
title | Multi-criterial evaluation of P-removal optimization in rural wastewater treatment plants for a sub-catchment of the Baltic Sea |
title_full | Multi-criterial evaluation of P-removal optimization in rural wastewater treatment plants for a sub-catchment of the Baltic Sea |
title_fullStr | Multi-criterial evaluation of P-removal optimization in rural wastewater treatment plants for a sub-catchment of the Baltic Sea |
title_full_unstemmed | Multi-criterial evaluation of P-removal optimization in rural wastewater treatment plants for a sub-catchment of the Baltic Sea |
title_short | Multi-criterial evaluation of P-removal optimization in rural wastewater treatment plants for a sub-catchment of the Baltic Sea |
title_sort | multi-criterial evaluation of p-removal optimization in rural wastewater treatment plants for a sub-catchment of the baltic sea |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5722745/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29164535 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13280-017-0977-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cramermichael multicriterialevaluationofpremovaloptimizationinruralwastewatertreatmentplantsforasubcatchmentofthebalticsea AT koegsttatyana multicriterialevaluationofpremovaloptimizationinruralwastewatertreatmentplantsforasubcatchmentofthebalticsea AT traencknerjens multicriterialevaluationofpremovaloptimizationinruralwastewatertreatmentplantsforasubcatchmentofthebalticsea |