Cargando…

A comparison of methods to measure central and peripheral oxytocin concentrations in human and non-human primates

Oxytocin (OT) concentration in the blood is considered to be a marker of its action in the brain. However, two problems have emerged when measuring OT level in the blood. First, it is unclear whether different methods of assessment lead to similar OT values. Second, it is unclear if plasma OT concen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lefevre, Arthur, Mottolese, Raphaëlle, Dirheimer, Manon, Mottolese, Carmine, Duhamel, Jean-René, Sirigu, Angela
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5722864/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29222505
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-17674-7
_version_ 1783285091575791616
author Lefevre, Arthur
Mottolese, Raphaëlle
Dirheimer, Manon
Mottolese, Carmine
Duhamel, Jean-René
Sirigu, Angela
author_facet Lefevre, Arthur
Mottolese, Raphaëlle
Dirheimer, Manon
Mottolese, Carmine
Duhamel, Jean-René
Sirigu, Angela
author_sort Lefevre, Arthur
collection PubMed
description Oxytocin (OT) concentration in the blood is considered to be a marker of its action in the brain. However, two problems have emerged when measuring OT level in the blood. First, it is unclear whether different methods of assessment lead to similar OT values. Second, it is unclear if plasma OT concentrations is informative on what OT does in the brain. To clarify these issues, we collected cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) from the brain ventricle of 25 patients during surgery to compare with plasma OT after simultaneous blood withdrawal. Additionally, we collected 12 CSF and blood samples from non-human primates while awake or under anaesthesia. We used four methods to assay OT concentrations: Commercial EIA with/without extraction, laboratory developed EIA with filtration and RIA with extraction. Three of these methods showed a positive correlation between plasma and CSF OT, suggesting a link between plasma and central OT, at least under specific testing conditions. However, none of the methods correlated to each other. Our results show major disagreements among methods used here to measure peripheral and brain OT and therefore they call for more caution when plasma OT is taken as a marker of central OT.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5722864
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57228642017-12-12 A comparison of methods to measure central and peripheral oxytocin concentrations in human and non-human primates Lefevre, Arthur Mottolese, Raphaëlle Dirheimer, Manon Mottolese, Carmine Duhamel, Jean-René Sirigu, Angela Sci Rep Article Oxytocin (OT) concentration in the blood is considered to be a marker of its action in the brain. However, two problems have emerged when measuring OT level in the blood. First, it is unclear whether different methods of assessment lead to similar OT values. Second, it is unclear if plasma OT concentrations is informative on what OT does in the brain. To clarify these issues, we collected cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) from the brain ventricle of 25 patients during surgery to compare with plasma OT after simultaneous blood withdrawal. Additionally, we collected 12 CSF and blood samples from non-human primates while awake or under anaesthesia. We used four methods to assay OT concentrations: Commercial EIA with/without extraction, laboratory developed EIA with filtration and RIA with extraction. Three of these methods showed a positive correlation between plasma and CSF OT, suggesting a link between plasma and central OT, at least under specific testing conditions. However, none of the methods correlated to each other. Our results show major disagreements among methods used here to measure peripheral and brain OT and therefore they call for more caution when plasma OT is taken as a marker of central OT. Nature Publishing Group UK 2017-12-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5722864/ /pubmed/29222505 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-17674-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Lefevre, Arthur
Mottolese, Raphaëlle
Dirheimer, Manon
Mottolese, Carmine
Duhamel, Jean-René
Sirigu, Angela
A comparison of methods to measure central and peripheral oxytocin concentrations in human and non-human primates
title A comparison of methods to measure central and peripheral oxytocin concentrations in human and non-human primates
title_full A comparison of methods to measure central and peripheral oxytocin concentrations in human and non-human primates
title_fullStr A comparison of methods to measure central and peripheral oxytocin concentrations in human and non-human primates
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of methods to measure central and peripheral oxytocin concentrations in human and non-human primates
title_short A comparison of methods to measure central and peripheral oxytocin concentrations in human and non-human primates
title_sort comparison of methods to measure central and peripheral oxytocin concentrations in human and non-human primates
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5722864/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29222505
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-17674-7
work_keys_str_mv AT lefevrearthur acomparisonofmethodstomeasurecentralandperipheraloxytocinconcentrationsinhumanandnonhumanprimates
AT mottoleseraphaelle acomparisonofmethodstomeasurecentralandperipheraloxytocinconcentrationsinhumanandnonhumanprimates
AT dirheimermanon acomparisonofmethodstomeasurecentralandperipheraloxytocinconcentrationsinhumanandnonhumanprimates
AT mottolesecarmine acomparisonofmethodstomeasurecentralandperipheraloxytocinconcentrationsinhumanandnonhumanprimates
AT duhameljeanrene acomparisonofmethodstomeasurecentralandperipheraloxytocinconcentrationsinhumanandnonhumanprimates
AT siriguangela acomparisonofmethodstomeasurecentralandperipheraloxytocinconcentrationsinhumanandnonhumanprimates
AT lefevrearthur comparisonofmethodstomeasurecentralandperipheraloxytocinconcentrationsinhumanandnonhumanprimates
AT mottoleseraphaelle comparisonofmethodstomeasurecentralandperipheraloxytocinconcentrationsinhumanandnonhumanprimates
AT dirheimermanon comparisonofmethodstomeasurecentralandperipheraloxytocinconcentrationsinhumanandnonhumanprimates
AT mottolesecarmine comparisonofmethodstomeasurecentralandperipheraloxytocinconcentrationsinhumanandnonhumanprimates
AT duhameljeanrene comparisonofmethodstomeasurecentralandperipheraloxytocinconcentrationsinhumanandnonhumanprimates
AT siriguangela comparisonofmethodstomeasurecentralandperipheraloxytocinconcentrationsinhumanandnonhumanprimates