Cargando…
A comparison of methods to measure central and peripheral oxytocin concentrations in human and non-human primates
Oxytocin (OT) concentration in the blood is considered to be a marker of its action in the brain. However, two problems have emerged when measuring OT level in the blood. First, it is unclear whether different methods of assessment lead to similar OT values. Second, it is unclear if plasma OT concen...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5722864/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29222505 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-17674-7 |
_version_ | 1783285091575791616 |
---|---|
author | Lefevre, Arthur Mottolese, Raphaëlle Dirheimer, Manon Mottolese, Carmine Duhamel, Jean-René Sirigu, Angela |
author_facet | Lefevre, Arthur Mottolese, Raphaëlle Dirheimer, Manon Mottolese, Carmine Duhamel, Jean-René Sirigu, Angela |
author_sort | Lefevre, Arthur |
collection | PubMed |
description | Oxytocin (OT) concentration in the blood is considered to be a marker of its action in the brain. However, two problems have emerged when measuring OT level in the blood. First, it is unclear whether different methods of assessment lead to similar OT values. Second, it is unclear if plasma OT concentrations is informative on what OT does in the brain. To clarify these issues, we collected cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) from the brain ventricle of 25 patients during surgery to compare with plasma OT after simultaneous blood withdrawal. Additionally, we collected 12 CSF and blood samples from non-human primates while awake or under anaesthesia. We used four methods to assay OT concentrations: Commercial EIA with/without extraction, laboratory developed EIA with filtration and RIA with extraction. Three of these methods showed a positive correlation between plasma and CSF OT, suggesting a link between plasma and central OT, at least under specific testing conditions. However, none of the methods correlated to each other. Our results show major disagreements among methods used here to measure peripheral and brain OT and therefore they call for more caution when plasma OT is taken as a marker of central OT. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5722864 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57228642017-12-12 A comparison of methods to measure central and peripheral oxytocin concentrations in human and non-human primates Lefevre, Arthur Mottolese, Raphaëlle Dirheimer, Manon Mottolese, Carmine Duhamel, Jean-René Sirigu, Angela Sci Rep Article Oxytocin (OT) concentration in the blood is considered to be a marker of its action in the brain. However, two problems have emerged when measuring OT level in the blood. First, it is unclear whether different methods of assessment lead to similar OT values. Second, it is unclear if plasma OT concentrations is informative on what OT does in the brain. To clarify these issues, we collected cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) from the brain ventricle of 25 patients during surgery to compare with plasma OT after simultaneous blood withdrawal. Additionally, we collected 12 CSF and blood samples from non-human primates while awake or under anaesthesia. We used four methods to assay OT concentrations: Commercial EIA with/without extraction, laboratory developed EIA with filtration and RIA with extraction. Three of these methods showed a positive correlation between plasma and CSF OT, suggesting a link between plasma and central OT, at least under specific testing conditions. However, none of the methods correlated to each other. Our results show major disagreements among methods used here to measure peripheral and brain OT and therefore they call for more caution when plasma OT is taken as a marker of central OT. Nature Publishing Group UK 2017-12-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5722864/ /pubmed/29222505 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-17674-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Lefevre, Arthur Mottolese, Raphaëlle Dirheimer, Manon Mottolese, Carmine Duhamel, Jean-René Sirigu, Angela A comparison of methods to measure central and peripheral oxytocin concentrations in human and non-human primates |
title | A comparison of methods to measure central and peripheral oxytocin concentrations in human and non-human primates |
title_full | A comparison of methods to measure central and peripheral oxytocin concentrations in human and non-human primates |
title_fullStr | A comparison of methods to measure central and peripheral oxytocin concentrations in human and non-human primates |
title_full_unstemmed | A comparison of methods to measure central and peripheral oxytocin concentrations in human and non-human primates |
title_short | A comparison of methods to measure central and peripheral oxytocin concentrations in human and non-human primates |
title_sort | comparison of methods to measure central and peripheral oxytocin concentrations in human and non-human primates |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5722864/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29222505 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-17674-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lefevrearthur acomparisonofmethodstomeasurecentralandperipheraloxytocinconcentrationsinhumanandnonhumanprimates AT mottoleseraphaelle acomparisonofmethodstomeasurecentralandperipheraloxytocinconcentrationsinhumanandnonhumanprimates AT dirheimermanon acomparisonofmethodstomeasurecentralandperipheraloxytocinconcentrationsinhumanandnonhumanprimates AT mottolesecarmine acomparisonofmethodstomeasurecentralandperipheraloxytocinconcentrationsinhumanandnonhumanprimates AT duhameljeanrene acomparisonofmethodstomeasurecentralandperipheraloxytocinconcentrationsinhumanandnonhumanprimates AT siriguangela acomparisonofmethodstomeasurecentralandperipheraloxytocinconcentrationsinhumanandnonhumanprimates AT lefevrearthur comparisonofmethodstomeasurecentralandperipheraloxytocinconcentrationsinhumanandnonhumanprimates AT mottoleseraphaelle comparisonofmethodstomeasurecentralandperipheraloxytocinconcentrationsinhumanandnonhumanprimates AT dirheimermanon comparisonofmethodstomeasurecentralandperipheraloxytocinconcentrationsinhumanandnonhumanprimates AT mottolesecarmine comparisonofmethodstomeasurecentralandperipheraloxytocinconcentrationsinhumanandnonhumanprimates AT duhameljeanrene comparisonofmethodstomeasurecentralandperipheraloxytocinconcentrationsinhumanandnonhumanprimates AT siriguangela comparisonofmethodstomeasurecentralandperipheraloxytocinconcentrationsinhumanandnonhumanprimates |