Cargando…

Double-catheter lavage combined with percutaneous flexible endoscopic debridement for infected pancreatic necrosis failed to percutaneous catheter drainage

BACKGROUND: Infected pancreatic necrosis (IPN) is a serious local complication of acute pancreatitis, with high mortality. Minimally invasive therapy including percutaneous catheter drainage (PCD) has become the preferred method for IPN instead of traditional open necrosectomy. However, the efficacy...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Pi, Song, Jun, Ke, Hua-jing, Lv, Nong-hua, Zhu, Yin, Zeng, Hao, Zhu, Yong, Xia, Liang, He, Wen-hua, Li, Ji, Huang, Xin, Lei, Yu-peng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5723031/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29221438
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-017-0717-3
_version_ 1783285132244811776
author Liu, Pi
Song, Jun
Ke, Hua-jing
Lv, Nong-hua
Zhu, Yin
Zeng, Hao
Zhu, Yong
Xia, Liang
He, Wen-hua
Li, Ji
Huang, Xin
Lei, Yu-peng
author_facet Liu, Pi
Song, Jun
Ke, Hua-jing
Lv, Nong-hua
Zhu, Yin
Zeng, Hao
Zhu, Yong
Xia, Liang
He, Wen-hua
Li, Ji
Huang, Xin
Lei, Yu-peng
author_sort Liu, Pi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Infected pancreatic necrosis (IPN) is a serious local complication of acute pancreatitis, with high mortality. Minimally invasive therapy including percutaneous catheter drainage (PCD) has become the preferred method for IPN instead of traditional open necrosectomy. However, the efficacy of double-catheter lavage in combination with percutaneous flexible endoscopic debridement after PCD failure is unknown compared with surgical necrosectomy. METHODS: A total of 27 cases of IPN patients with failure PCD between Jan 2014 and Dec 2015 were enrolled in this retrospective cohort study. Fifteen patients received double-catheter lavage in combination with percutaneous flexible endoscopic debridement, and 12 patients underwent open necrosectomy. The primary endpoint was the composite end point of major complications or death. The secondary endpoint included mortality, major complication rate, ICU admission length of stay, and overall length of stay. RESULTS: The primary endpoint occurrence rate in double-catheter lavage in combination with percutaneous flexible endoscopic debridement group (8/15, 53%) was significantly lower than that in open necrosectomy group (11/12, 92%) (RR = 1.71, 95% CI = 1.04 – 2.84, P < 0.05). Though the mortality between two groups showed no statistical significance (0% vs. 17%, P = 0.19), the rate of new-onset multiple organ failure and ICU admission length of stay in the experimental group was significantly lower than that in open necrosectomy group (13% vs. 58%, P = 0.04; 0 vs. 17, P = 0.02, respectively). Only 40% of patients required ICU admission after percutaneous debridement, which was markedly lower than the patients who underwent surgery (83%; P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Double-catheter lavage in combination with percutaneous flexible endoscopic debridement showed superior effectiveness, safety, and convenience in patients with IPN after PCD failure as compared to open necrosectomy. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12876-017-0717-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5723031
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57230312017-12-12 Double-catheter lavage combined with percutaneous flexible endoscopic debridement for infected pancreatic necrosis failed to percutaneous catheter drainage Liu, Pi Song, Jun Ke, Hua-jing Lv, Nong-hua Zhu, Yin Zeng, Hao Zhu, Yong Xia, Liang He, Wen-hua Li, Ji Huang, Xin Lei, Yu-peng BMC Gastroenterol Technical Advance BACKGROUND: Infected pancreatic necrosis (IPN) is a serious local complication of acute pancreatitis, with high mortality. Minimally invasive therapy including percutaneous catheter drainage (PCD) has become the preferred method for IPN instead of traditional open necrosectomy. However, the efficacy of double-catheter lavage in combination with percutaneous flexible endoscopic debridement after PCD failure is unknown compared with surgical necrosectomy. METHODS: A total of 27 cases of IPN patients with failure PCD between Jan 2014 and Dec 2015 were enrolled in this retrospective cohort study. Fifteen patients received double-catheter lavage in combination with percutaneous flexible endoscopic debridement, and 12 patients underwent open necrosectomy. The primary endpoint was the composite end point of major complications or death. The secondary endpoint included mortality, major complication rate, ICU admission length of stay, and overall length of stay. RESULTS: The primary endpoint occurrence rate in double-catheter lavage in combination with percutaneous flexible endoscopic debridement group (8/15, 53%) was significantly lower than that in open necrosectomy group (11/12, 92%) (RR = 1.71, 95% CI = 1.04 – 2.84, P < 0.05). Though the mortality between two groups showed no statistical significance (0% vs. 17%, P = 0.19), the rate of new-onset multiple organ failure and ICU admission length of stay in the experimental group was significantly lower than that in open necrosectomy group (13% vs. 58%, P = 0.04; 0 vs. 17, P = 0.02, respectively). Only 40% of patients required ICU admission after percutaneous debridement, which was markedly lower than the patients who underwent surgery (83%; P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Double-catheter lavage in combination with percutaneous flexible endoscopic debridement showed superior effectiveness, safety, and convenience in patients with IPN after PCD failure as compared to open necrosectomy. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12876-017-0717-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-12-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5723031/ /pubmed/29221438 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-017-0717-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Technical Advance
Liu, Pi
Song, Jun
Ke, Hua-jing
Lv, Nong-hua
Zhu, Yin
Zeng, Hao
Zhu, Yong
Xia, Liang
He, Wen-hua
Li, Ji
Huang, Xin
Lei, Yu-peng
Double-catheter lavage combined with percutaneous flexible endoscopic debridement for infected pancreatic necrosis failed to percutaneous catheter drainage
title Double-catheter lavage combined with percutaneous flexible endoscopic debridement for infected pancreatic necrosis failed to percutaneous catheter drainage
title_full Double-catheter lavage combined with percutaneous flexible endoscopic debridement for infected pancreatic necrosis failed to percutaneous catheter drainage
title_fullStr Double-catheter lavage combined with percutaneous flexible endoscopic debridement for infected pancreatic necrosis failed to percutaneous catheter drainage
title_full_unstemmed Double-catheter lavage combined with percutaneous flexible endoscopic debridement for infected pancreatic necrosis failed to percutaneous catheter drainage
title_short Double-catheter lavage combined with percutaneous flexible endoscopic debridement for infected pancreatic necrosis failed to percutaneous catheter drainage
title_sort double-catheter lavage combined with percutaneous flexible endoscopic debridement for infected pancreatic necrosis failed to percutaneous catheter drainage
topic Technical Advance
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5723031/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29221438
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-017-0717-3
work_keys_str_mv AT liupi doublecatheterlavagecombinedwithpercutaneousflexibleendoscopicdebridementforinfectedpancreaticnecrosisfailedtopercutaneouscatheterdrainage
AT songjun doublecatheterlavagecombinedwithpercutaneousflexibleendoscopicdebridementforinfectedpancreaticnecrosisfailedtopercutaneouscatheterdrainage
AT kehuajing doublecatheterlavagecombinedwithpercutaneousflexibleendoscopicdebridementforinfectedpancreaticnecrosisfailedtopercutaneouscatheterdrainage
AT lvnonghua doublecatheterlavagecombinedwithpercutaneousflexibleendoscopicdebridementforinfectedpancreaticnecrosisfailedtopercutaneouscatheterdrainage
AT zhuyin doublecatheterlavagecombinedwithpercutaneousflexibleendoscopicdebridementforinfectedpancreaticnecrosisfailedtopercutaneouscatheterdrainage
AT zenghao doublecatheterlavagecombinedwithpercutaneousflexibleendoscopicdebridementforinfectedpancreaticnecrosisfailedtopercutaneouscatheterdrainage
AT zhuyong doublecatheterlavagecombinedwithpercutaneousflexibleendoscopicdebridementforinfectedpancreaticnecrosisfailedtopercutaneouscatheterdrainage
AT xialiang doublecatheterlavagecombinedwithpercutaneousflexibleendoscopicdebridementforinfectedpancreaticnecrosisfailedtopercutaneouscatheterdrainage
AT hewenhua doublecatheterlavagecombinedwithpercutaneousflexibleendoscopicdebridementforinfectedpancreaticnecrosisfailedtopercutaneouscatheterdrainage
AT liji doublecatheterlavagecombinedwithpercutaneousflexibleendoscopicdebridementforinfectedpancreaticnecrosisfailedtopercutaneouscatheterdrainage
AT huangxin doublecatheterlavagecombinedwithpercutaneousflexibleendoscopicdebridementforinfectedpancreaticnecrosisfailedtopercutaneouscatheterdrainage
AT leiyupeng doublecatheterlavagecombinedwithpercutaneousflexibleendoscopicdebridementforinfectedpancreaticnecrosisfailedtopercutaneouscatheterdrainage