Cargando…

The effects of low-intensity blood flow restricted exercise compared with conventional resistance training on the clinical outcomes of active UK military personnel following a 3-week in-patient rehabilitation programme: protocol for a randomized controlled feasibility study

BACKGROUND: A challenge for rehabilitation practitioners lies in designing optimal exercise programmes that facilitate musculoskeletal (MSK) adaptations whilst simultaneously accommodating biological healing and the safe loading of an injured limb. A growing body of evidence supports the use of resi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ladlow, Peter, Coppack, Russell J., Dharm-Datta, Shreshth, Conway, Dean, Sellon, Edward, Patterson, Stephen D., Bennett, Alexander N.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5723055/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29234504
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-017-0216-x
_version_ 1783285138202820608
author Ladlow, Peter
Coppack, Russell J.
Dharm-Datta, Shreshth
Conway, Dean
Sellon, Edward
Patterson, Stephen D.
Bennett, Alexander N.
author_facet Ladlow, Peter
Coppack, Russell J.
Dharm-Datta, Shreshth
Conway, Dean
Sellon, Edward
Patterson, Stephen D.
Bennett, Alexander N.
author_sort Ladlow, Peter
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A challenge for rehabilitation practitioners lies in designing optimal exercise programmes that facilitate musculoskeletal (MSK) adaptations whilst simultaneously accommodating biological healing and the safe loading of an injured limb. A growing body of evidence supports the use of resistance training at a reduced load in combination with blood flow restriction (BFR) to enhance hypertrophic and strength responses in skeletal muscle. In-patient rehabilitation has a long tradition in the UK Military, however, the efficacy of low intensity (LI) BFR training has not been tested in this rehabilitation setting. The aims of this study are to determine (1) the feasibility of a randomised controlled trial (RCT) investigating LI-BFR training in a residential, multidisciplinary treatment programme and (2) provide preliminary data describing the within and between-group treatment effects of a LI-BFR intervention and a conventional resistance training group in military personnel. METHODS: This is a single-blind randomised controlled feasibility study. A minimum of 28 lower-limb injured UK military personnel, aged 18 to 50 years, attending rehabilitation at the UK Defence Medical Rehabilitation Centre (DMRC) will be recruited into the study. After completion of baseline measurements, participants will be randomised in a 1:1 ratio to receive 3 weeks (15 days) of intensive multidisciplinary team (MDT) in-patient rehabilitation. Group 1 will receive conventional resistance training 3 days per week. Group 2 will perform twice daily LI-BFR training. Both groups will also undertake the same common elements of the existing MDT programme. Repeat follow-up assessments will be undertaken upon completion of treatment. Group 2 participants will be asked to rate their pain response to LI-BFR training every five sessions. DISCUSSION: The results will provide information on the feasibility of a full-scale RCT. Recommendations for an adequately powered study to determine the efficacy of LI-BFR training during in-patient rehabilitation can then be made. The study may also provide insights into the potential effectiveness of LI-BFR training as a novel exercise modality to induce muscle adaptations in the absence of high mechanical loading of the lower-limb. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN Reference: ISRCTN 63585315 dated 25 April 2017.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5723055
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57230552017-12-12 The effects of low-intensity blood flow restricted exercise compared with conventional resistance training on the clinical outcomes of active UK military personnel following a 3-week in-patient rehabilitation programme: protocol for a randomized controlled feasibility study Ladlow, Peter Coppack, Russell J. Dharm-Datta, Shreshth Conway, Dean Sellon, Edward Patterson, Stephen D. Bennett, Alexander N. Pilot Feasibility Stud Study Protocol BACKGROUND: A challenge for rehabilitation practitioners lies in designing optimal exercise programmes that facilitate musculoskeletal (MSK) adaptations whilst simultaneously accommodating biological healing and the safe loading of an injured limb. A growing body of evidence supports the use of resistance training at a reduced load in combination with blood flow restriction (BFR) to enhance hypertrophic and strength responses in skeletal muscle. In-patient rehabilitation has a long tradition in the UK Military, however, the efficacy of low intensity (LI) BFR training has not been tested in this rehabilitation setting. The aims of this study are to determine (1) the feasibility of a randomised controlled trial (RCT) investigating LI-BFR training in a residential, multidisciplinary treatment programme and (2) provide preliminary data describing the within and between-group treatment effects of a LI-BFR intervention and a conventional resistance training group in military personnel. METHODS: This is a single-blind randomised controlled feasibility study. A minimum of 28 lower-limb injured UK military personnel, aged 18 to 50 years, attending rehabilitation at the UK Defence Medical Rehabilitation Centre (DMRC) will be recruited into the study. After completion of baseline measurements, participants will be randomised in a 1:1 ratio to receive 3 weeks (15 days) of intensive multidisciplinary team (MDT) in-patient rehabilitation. Group 1 will receive conventional resistance training 3 days per week. Group 2 will perform twice daily LI-BFR training. Both groups will also undertake the same common elements of the existing MDT programme. Repeat follow-up assessments will be undertaken upon completion of treatment. Group 2 participants will be asked to rate their pain response to LI-BFR training every five sessions. DISCUSSION: The results will provide information on the feasibility of a full-scale RCT. Recommendations for an adequately powered study to determine the efficacy of LI-BFR training during in-patient rehabilitation can then be made. The study may also provide insights into the potential effectiveness of LI-BFR training as a novel exercise modality to induce muscle adaptations in the absence of high mechanical loading of the lower-limb. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN Reference: ISRCTN 63585315 dated 25 April 2017. BioMed Central 2017-12-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5723055/ /pubmed/29234504 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-017-0216-x Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Ladlow, Peter
Coppack, Russell J.
Dharm-Datta, Shreshth
Conway, Dean
Sellon, Edward
Patterson, Stephen D.
Bennett, Alexander N.
The effects of low-intensity blood flow restricted exercise compared with conventional resistance training on the clinical outcomes of active UK military personnel following a 3-week in-patient rehabilitation programme: protocol for a randomized controlled feasibility study
title The effects of low-intensity blood flow restricted exercise compared with conventional resistance training on the clinical outcomes of active UK military personnel following a 3-week in-patient rehabilitation programme: protocol for a randomized controlled feasibility study
title_full The effects of low-intensity blood flow restricted exercise compared with conventional resistance training on the clinical outcomes of active UK military personnel following a 3-week in-patient rehabilitation programme: protocol for a randomized controlled feasibility study
title_fullStr The effects of low-intensity blood flow restricted exercise compared with conventional resistance training on the clinical outcomes of active UK military personnel following a 3-week in-patient rehabilitation programme: protocol for a randomized controlled feasibility study
title_full_unstemmed The effects of low-intensity blood flow restricted exercise compared with conventional resistance training on the clinical outcomes of active UK military personnel following a 3-week in-patient rehabilitation programme: protocol for a randomized controlled feasibility study
title_short The effects of low-intensity blood flow restricted exercise compared with conventional resistance training on the clinical outcomes of active UK military personnel following a 3-week in-patient rehabilitation programme: protocol for a randomized controlled feasibility study
title_sort effects of low-intensity blood flow restricted exercise compared with conventional resistance training on the clinical outcomes of active uk military personnel following a 3-week in-patient rehabilitation programme: protocol for a randomized controlled feasibility study
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5723055/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29234504
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-017-0216-x
work_keys_str_mv AT ladlowpeter theeffectsoflowintensitybloodflowrestrictedexercisecomparedwithconventionalresistancetrainingontheclinicaloutcomesofactiveukmilitarypersonnelfollowinga3weekinpatientrehabilitationprogrammeprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledfeasibilitystudy
AT coppackrussellj theeffectsoflowintensitybloodflowrestrictedexercisecomparedwithconventionalresistancetrainingontheclinicaloutcomesofactiveukmilitarypersonnelfollowinga3weekinpatientrehabilitationprogrammeprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledfeasibilitystudy
AT dharmdattashreshth theeffectsoflowintensitybloodflowrestrictedexercisecomparedwithconventionalresistancetrainingontheclinicaloutcomesofactiveukmilitarypersonnelfollowinga3weekinpatientrehabilitationprogrammeprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledfeasibilitystudy
AT conwaydean theeffectsoflowintensitybloodflowrestrictedexercisecomparedwithconventionalresistancetrainingontheclinicaloutcomesofactiveukmilitarypersonnelfollowinga3weekinpatientrehabilitationprogrammeprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledfeasibilitystudy
AT sellonedward theeffectsoflowintensitybloodflowrestrictedexercisecomparedwithconventionalresistancetrainingontheclinicaloutcomesofactiveukmilitarypersonnelfollowinga3weekinpatientrehabilitationprogrammeprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledfeasibilitystudy
AT pattersonstephend theeffectsoflowintensitybloodflowrestrictedexercisecomparedwithconventionalresistancetrainingontheclinicaloutcomesofactiveukmilitarypersonnelfollowinga3weekinpatientrehabilitationprogrammeprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledfeasibilitystudy
AT bennettalexandern theeffectsoflowintensitybloodflowrestrictedexercisecomparedwithconventionalresistancetrainingontheclinicaloutcomesofactiveukmilitarypersonnelfollowinga3weekinpatientrehabilitationprogrammeprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledfeasibilitystudy
AT ladlowpeter effectsoflowintensitybloodflowrestrictedexercisecomparedwithconventionalresistancetrainingontheclinicaloutcomesofactiveukmilitarypersonnelfollowinga3weekinpatientrehabilitationprogrammeprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledfeasibilitystudy
AT coppackrussellj effectsoflowintensitybloodflowrestrictedexercisecomparedwithconventionalresistancetrainingontheclinicaloutcomesofactiveukmilitarypersonnelfollowinga3weekinpatientrehabilitationprogrammeprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledfeasibilitystudy
AT dharmdattashreshth effectsoflowintensitybloodflowrestrictedexercisecomparedwithconventionalresistancetrainingontheclinicaloutcomesofactiveukmilitarypersonnelfollowinga3weekinpatientrehabilitationprogrammeprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledfeasibilitystudy
AT conwaydean effectsoflowintensitybloodflowrestrictedexercisecomparedwithconventionalresistancetrainingontheclinicaloutcomesofactiveukmilitarypersonnelfollowinga3weekinpatientrehabilitationprogrammeprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledfeasibilitystudy
AT sellonedward effectsoflowintensitybloodflowrestrictedexercisecomparedwithconventionalresistancetrainingontheclinicaloutcomesofactiveukmilitarypersonnelfollowinga3weekinpatientrehabilitationprogrammeprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledfeasibilitystudy
AT pattersonstephend effectsoflowintensitybloodflowrestrictedexercisecomparedwithconventionalresistancetrainingontheclinicaloutcomesofactiveukmilitarypersonnelfollowinga3weekinpatientrehabilitationprogrammeprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledfeasibilitystudy
AT bennettalexandern effectsoflowintensitybloodflowrestrictedexercisecomparedwithconventionalresistancetrainingontheclinicaloutcomesofactiveukmilitarypersonnelfollowinga3weekinpatientrehabilitationprogrammeprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledfeasibilitystudy