Cargando…

An Evaluation Protocol for Picture Archiving and Communication System: a Systematic Review

INTRODUCTION: Picture archiving and communication system (PACS) serves to store, transmit, communicate and manage medical images. A logical evaluation protocol assists to determine whether the system is technically, structurally and operationally fit. The purpose of this systematic review was to pro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tabatabaei, Mohsen S., Langarizadeh, Mostafa, Tavakol, Kamran
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AVICENA, d.o.o., Sarajevo 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5723173/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29284915
http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/aim.2017.25.250-253
_version_ 1783285163294195712
author Tabatabaei, Mohsen S.
Langarizadeh, Mostafa
Tavakol, Kamran
author_facet Tabatabaei, Mohsen S.
Langarizadeh, Mostafa
Tavakol, Kamran
author_sort Tabatabaei, Mohsen S.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Picture archiving and communication system (PACS) serves to store, transmit, communicate and manage medical images. A logical evaluation protocol assists to determine whether the system is technically, structurally and operationally fit. The purpose of this systematic review was to propose a logical evaluation protocol for PACS, particularly useful for new hospitals and other healthcare institutions in developing countries. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We systematically reviewed 25 out of 267 full-length articles, published between 2000 and 2017, retrieved from four sources: Science Direct, Scopus, PubMed and Google Scholar. The extracted data were tabulated and reviewed successively by three independent panels of experts that oversaw the design of this study and the process by which the PACS evaluation protocol was systematically developed. RESULTS: The outcome data were ranked by expert panels and analyzed statistically, with the reliability established at 0.82 based on the Pearson’s correlation coefficient. The essential components and the best options to establish an optimal PACS were organized under nine main sections: system configuration; system network; data storage; data compression; image input; image characteristics; image presentation; communication link; and system security, with a total of 20 components, each of which capable of working optimally with one or more program options. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review presents an objective protocol that is an ideal tool for the evaluation of new or existing PACS at healthcare institutions, particularly in developing countries. Despite the significant advantages, the protocol may face minor limitations, largely due to lack of appropriate technical resources in various clinical settings and the host countries.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5723173
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher AVICENA, d.o.o., Sarajevo
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57231732017-12-28 An Evaluation Protocol for Picture Archiving and Communication System: a Systematic Review Tabatabaei, Mohsen S. Langarizadeh, Mostafa Tavakol, Kamran Acta Inform Med Original Paper INTRODUCTION: Picture archiving and communication system (PACS) serves to store, transmit, communicate and manage medical images. A logical evaluation protocol assists to determine whether the system is technically, structurally and operationally fit. The purpose of this systematic review was to propose a logical evaluation protocol for PACS, particularly useful for new hospitals and other healthcare institutions in developing countries. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We systematically reviewed 25 out of 267 full-length articles, published between 2000 and 2017, retrieved from four sources: Science Direct, Scopus, PubMed and Google Scholar. The extracted data were tabulated and reviewed successively by three independent panels of experts that oversaw the design of this study and the process by which the PACS evaluation protocol was systematically developed. RESULTS: The outcome data were ranked by expert panels and analyzed statistically, with the reliability established at 0.82 based on the Pearson’s correlation coefficient. The essential components and the best options to establish an optimal PACS were organized under nine main sections: system configuration; system network; data storage; data compression; image input; image characteristics; image presentation; communication link; and system security, with a total of 20 components, each of which capable of working optimally with one or more program options. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review presents an objective protocol that is an ideal tool for the evaluation of new or existing PACS at healthcare institutions, particularly in developing countries. Despite the significant advantages, the protocol may face minor limitations, largely due to lack of appropriate technical resources in various clinical settings and the host countries. AVICENA, d.o.o., Sarajevo 2017-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5723173/ /pubmed/29284915 http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/aim.2017.25.250-253 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Mohsen S. Tabatabaei, Mostafa Langarizadeh, Kamran Tavakol http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Tabatabaei, Mohsen S.
Langarizadeh, Mostafa
Tavakol, Kamran
An Evaluation Protocol for Picture Archiving and Communication System: a Systematic Review
title An Evaluation Protocol for Picture Archiving and Communication System: a Systematic Review
title_full An Evaluation Protocol for Picture Archiving and Communication System: a Systematic Review
title_fullStr An Evaluation Protocol for Picture Archiving and Communication System: a Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed An Evaluation Protocol for Picture Archiving and Communication System: a Systematic Review
title_short An Evaluation Protocol for Picture Archiving and Communication System: a Systematic Review
title_sort evaluation protocol for picture archiving and communication system: a systematic review
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5723173/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29284915
http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/aim.2017.25.250-253
work_keys_str_mv AT tabatabaeimohsens anevaluationprotocolforpicturearchivingandcommunicationsystemasystematicreview
AT langarizadehmostafa anevaluationprotocolforpicturearchivingandcommunicationsystemasystematicreview
AT tavakolkamran anevaluationprotocolforpicturearchivingandcommunicationsystemasystematicreview
AT tabatabaeimohsens evaluationprotocolforpicturearchivingandcommunicationsystemasystematicreview
AT langarizadehmostafa evaluationprotocolforpicturearchivingandcommunicationsystemasystematicreview
AT tavakolkamran evaluationprotocolforpicturearchivingandcommunicationsystemasystematicreview