Cargando…

Psychosocial Interventions and Wellbeing in Individuals with Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Purpose: A number of studies, including systematic reviews, show beneficial effects of psychosocial interventions for people with diabetes mellitus; however, they have not been assessed using meta-analysis. The purpose of this meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials is to investigate the effec...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pascoe, Michaela C., Thompson, David R., Castle, David J., Jenkins, Zoe M., Ski, Chantal F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5723413/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29259563
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02063
_version_ 1783285207772692480
author Pascoe, Michaela C.
Thompson, David R.
Castle, David J.
Jenkins, Zoe M.
Ski, Chantal F.
author_facet Pascoe, Michaela C.
Thompson, David R.
Castle, David J.
Jenkins, Zoe M.
Ski, Chantal F.
author_sort Pascoe, Michaela C.
collection PubMed
description Purpose: A number of studies, including systematic reviews, show beneficial effects of psychosocial interventions for people with diabetes mellitus; however, they have not been assessed using meta-analysis. The purpose of this meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials is to investigate the effects of psychosocial interventions on depressive and anxiety symptoms, quality of life and self-efficacy in individuals with diabetes mellitus. Methods: The databases Pubmed, MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Scopus, Web of Science and SocINDEX were searched with no year restriction. Eligible studies were randomized controlled trials published in English that included individuals diagnosed with diabetes mellitus, aged 18 years or above, who engaged in a psychosocial intervention, with outcome measures addressing depressive or anxiety symptomology, quality of life or self-efficacy. Eligible studies needed to compare the intervention to usual care. Study selection was completed using Covidence and meta-analysis was undertaken using Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software. Results: Seven studies were included in the meta-analysis. Five studies investigated the effects of psychosocial interventions and showed a medium to large benefit for depressive symptoms (SMD: −0.70; CI: −1.27, −0.13) which persisted at follow up (SMD: −1.54, CI: −2.97, −0.12). Similar results were not seen immediately post-intervention in the three studies that assessed anxiety symptoms (SMD: −0.30; CI: −0.69, 0.10); however, a medium beneficial effect was seen at follow up (SMD = −0.61, CI = −0.92 to −0.31). Small benefits were seen in the three studies assessing quality of life outcomes (SMD: 0.30, CI: 0.06, 0.55). No benefit was seen in the two studies assessing self-efficacy (SMD: 0.23, CI: −0.11, 0.57). Conclusions: The results of the current study provide preliminary evidence that psychosocial interventions, compared to usual care, reduce depressive symptoms, and may improve quality of life in individuals with diabetes. However, only a few studies were included and the clinical significance of these findings is unknown.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5723413
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57234132017-12-19 Psychosocial Interventions and Wellbeing in Individuals with Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Pascoe, Michaela C. Thompson, David R. Castle, David J. Jenkins, Zoe M. Ski, Chantal F. Front Psychol Psychology Purpose: A number of studies, including systematic reviews, show beneficial effects of psychosocial interventions for people with diabetes mellitus; however, they have not been assessed using meta-analysis. The purpose of this meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials is to investigate the effects of psychosocial interventions on depressive and anxiety symptoms, quality of life and self-efficacy in individuals with diabetes mellitus. Methods: The databases Pubmed, MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Scopus, Web of Science and SocINDEX were searched with no year restriction. Eligible studies were randomized controlled trials published in English that included individuals diagnosed with diabetes mellitus, aged 18 years or above, who engaged in a psychosocial intervention, with outcome measures addressing depressive or anxiety symptomology, quality of life or self-efficacy. Eligible studies needed to compare the intervention to usual care. Study selection was completed using Covidence and meta-analysis was undertaken using Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software. Results: Seven studies were included in the meta-analysis. Five studies investigated the effects of psychosocial interventions and showed a medium to large benefit for depressive symptoms (SMD: −0.70; CI: −1.27, −0.13) which persisted at follow up (SMD: −1.54, CI: −2.97, −0.12). Similar results were not seen immediately post-intervention in the three studies that assessed anxiety symptoms (SMD: −0.30; CI: −0.69, 0.10); however, a medium beneficial effect was seen at follow up (SMD = −0.61, CI = −0.92 to −0.31). Small benefits were seen in the three studies assessing quality of life outcomes (SMD: 0.30, CI: 0.06, 0.55). No benefit was seen in the two studies assessing self-efficacy (SMD: 0.23, CI: −0.11, 0.57). Conclusions: The results of the current study provide preliminary evidence that psychosocial interventions, compared to usual care, reduce depressive symptoms, and may improve quality of life in individuals with diabetes. However, only a few studies were included and the clinical significance of these findings is unknown. Frontiers Media S.A. 2017-12-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5723413/ /pubmed/29259563 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02063 Text en Copyright © 2017 Pascoe, Thompson, Castle, Jenkins and Ski. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Pascoe, Michaela C.
Thompson, David R.
Castle, David J.
Jenkins, Zoe M.
Ski, Chantal F.
Psychosocial Interventions and Wellbeing in Individuals with Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title Psychosocial Interventions and Wellbeing in Individuals with Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full Psychosocial Interventions and Wellbeing in Individuals with Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Psychosocial Interventions and Wellbeing in Individuals with Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Psychosocial Interventions and Wellbeing in Individuals with Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_short Psychosocial Interventions and Wellbeing in Individuals with Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_sort psychosocial interventions and wellbeing in individuals with diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5723413/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29259563
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02063
work_keys_str_mv AT pascoemichaelac psychosocialinterventionsandwellbeinginindividualswithdiabetesmellitusasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT thompsondavidr psychosocialinterventionsandwellbeinginindividualswithdiabetesmellitusasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT castledavidj psychosocialinterventionsandwellbeinginindividualswithdiabetesmellitusasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT jenkinszoem psychosocialinterventionsandwellbeinginindividualswithdiabetesmellitusasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT skichantalf psychosocialinterventionsandwellbeinginindividualswithdiabetesmellitusasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis