Cargando…

Quality assurance of registration of CT and MRI data sets for treatment planning of radiotherapy for head and neck cancers

We are implementing the use of magnetic resonance (MR) images for head and neck radiotherapy planning, which involves their registration with computed tomography (CT). The quality assurance (QA) of the registration process was an initial step of this program. A phantom was built, and appropriate mat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Moore, Craig S., Liney, Gary P., Beavis, Andrew W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2004
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5723443/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15753931
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v5i1.1951
_version_ 1783285212602433536
author Moore, Craig S.
Liney, Gary P.
Beavis, Andrew W.
author_facet Moore, Craig S.
Liney, Gary P.
Beavis, Andrew W.
author_sort Moore, Craig S.
collection PubMed
description We are implementing the use of magnetic resonance (MR) images for head and neck radiotherapy planning, which involves their registration with computed tomography (CT). The quality assurance (QA) of the registration process was an initial step of this program. A phantom was built, and appropriate materials were identified to produce clinically relevant MR [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] contrast for its constituent “anatomy.” We performed a characterization of the distortion detectable within our phantom. Finally, we assessed the accuracy of image registration by contouring structures in the registered/fused data sets using the treatment planning system. Each structure was contoured using each modality, in turn, blind of the other. The position, area, and perimeter of each structure were assessed as a measure of accuracy of the entire image registration process. Distortion effects in the MR image were shown to be minimized by choosing a suitable [Formula: see text] receiver bandwidth. Remaining distortion was deemed clinically acceptable within [Formula: see text] of the magnetic field isocenter. A coefficient of agreement (A) analysis gave values to be within 9% of unity, where [Formula: see text] is the ratio of the area/perimeter of a particular structure on CT to that on MR. The center of each structure of interest agreed to within 1.8 mm. A QA process has been developed to assess the accuracy of using multimodality image registration in the planning of radiotherapy for the head and neck; we believe its introduction is feasible and safe. PACS numbers: 87.53.Xd, 87.57.Gg, 87.59.Fm; 87.61.‐c, 87.66.Xa
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5723443
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2004
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57234432018-04-02 Quality assurance of registration of CT and MRI data sets for treatment planning of radiotherapy for head and neck cancers Moore, Craig S. Liney, Gary P. Beavis, Andrew W. J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics We are implementing the use of magnetic resonance (MR) images for head and neck radiotherapy planning, which involves their registration with computed tomography (CT). The quality assurance (QA) of the registration process was an initial step of this program. A phantom was built, and appropriate materials were identified to produce clinically relevant MR [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] contrast for its constituent “anatomy.” We performed a characterization of the distortion detectable within our phantom. Finally, we assessed the accuracy of image registration by contouring structures in the registered/fused data sets using the treatment planning system. Each structure was contoured using each modality, in turn, blind of the other. The position, area, and perimeter of each structure were assessed as a measure of accuracy of the entire image registration process. Distortion effects in the MR image were shown to be minimized by choosing a suitable [Formula: see text] receiver bandwidth. Remaining distortion was deemed clinically acceptable within [Formula: see text] of the magnetic field isocenter. A coefficient of agreement (A) analysis gave values to be within 9% of unity, where [Formula: see text] is the ratio of the area/perimeter of a particular structure on CT to that on MR. The center of each structure of interest agreed to within 1.8 mm. A QA process has been developed to assess the accuracy of using multimodality image registration in the planning of radiotherapy for the head and neck; we believe its introduction is feasible and safe. PACS numbers: 87.53.Xd, 87.57.Gg, 87.59.Fm; 87.61.‐c, 87.66.Xa John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2004-05-25 /pmc/articles/PMC5723443/ /pubmed/15753931 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v5i1.1951 Text en © 2004 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Moore, Craig S.
Liney, Gary P.
Beavis, Andrew W.
Quality assurance of registration of CT and MRI data sets for treatment planning of radiotherapy for head and neck cancers
title Quality assurance of registration of CT and MRI data sets for treatment planning of radiotherapy for head and neck cancers
title_full Quality assurance of registration of CT and MRI data sets for treatment planning of radiotherapy for head and neck cancers
title_fullStr Quality assurance of registration of CT and MRI data sets for treatment planning of radiotherapy for head and neck cancers
title_full_unstemmed Quality assurance of registration of CT and MRI data sets for treatment planning of radiotherapy for head and neck cancers
title_short Quality assurance of registration of CT and MRI data sets for treatment planning of radiotherapy for head and neck cancers
title_sort quality assurance of registration of ct and mri data sets for treatment planning of radiotherapy for head and neck cancers
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5723443/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15753931
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v5i1.1951
work_keys_str_mv AT moorecraigs qualityassuranceofregistrationofctandmridatasetsfortreatmentplanningofradiotherapyforheadandneckcancers
AT lineygaryp qualityassuranceofregistrationofctandmridatasetsfortreatmentplanningofradiotherapyforheadandneckcancers
AT beavisandreww qualityassuranceofregistrationofctandmridatasetsfortreatmentplanningofradiotherapyforheadandneckcancers