Cargando…

Anthropomorphic breast phantoms for quality assurance and dose verification

An evaluation of two anthropomorphic breast phantoms, which have been designed for quality assurance and dose verification of radiotherapy treatment of breast cancer patients, is presented. These phantoms are identical in terms of their dimensions and shape and composed of several layers of either P...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bencomo, José A., Chu, Connel, Tello, Victor M., Cho, Sang Hyun, Ibbott, Geoffrey S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2004
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5723446/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15753932
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v5i1.1992
_version_ 1783285213302882304
author Bencomo, José A.
Chu, Connel
Tello, Victor M.
Cho, Sang Hyun
Ibbott, Geoffrey S.
author_facet Bencomo, José A.
Chu, Connel
Tello, Victor M.
Cho, Sang Hyun
Ibbott, Geoffrey S.
author_sort Bencomo, José A.
collection PubMed
description An evaluation of two anthropomorphic breast phantoms, which have been designed for quality assurance and dose verification of radiotherapy treatment of breast cancer patients, is presented. These phantoms are identical in terms of their dimensions and shape and composed of several layers of either Plastic Water™ or tissue‐equivalent material. Both water‐and tissue‐equivalent phantoms include lung‐ and rib‐equivalent components. The phantoms simulate large, medium and small breasts. The value of the phantoms as breast treatment quality assurance tools was assessed by dose measurements with ionization chamber and thermoluminescence dosimeters (TLD) at different points inside the phantom. Measurements were made by irradiating the phantoms under conditions representing the different treatment techniques found by the Radiological Physics Center (RPC) during its dosimetry quality audits. Most irradiations were performed with the water‐equivalent breast phantom. One experiment was performed under consistent irradiation conditions to compare the tissue‐equivalent phantom with the water‐equivalent phantom. Measurements were compared with the dose estimated by the RPC's manual calculations used to check clinical charts of patients entered in a National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) protocol. Measurements were also compared with isodose distributions generated by a commercial radiation treatment planning (RTP) system. In the homogeneous three‐dimensional (3‐D) phantom, fairly good agreement (within 5%) was observed at the NSABP dose prescription point between measurements and 2‐D dose estimation by manual calculations. At the same dose prescription point, but located in the heterogeneous 3‐D phantom, agreement between measurements and a 3‐D RTP system was within about 3%. Manual calculation resulted in overestimation of up to 6%. The general agreement between the TLD measurements and the 2‐D RTP values was within 3% at various off‐axis points, with the exception of a few points far off‐axis, near the high‐dose gradient region at the surface of the phantom. PACS number(s): 87.53Dq, 87.66Xa, 87.53Xd
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5723446
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2004
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57234462018-04-02 Anthropomorphic breast phantoms for quality assurance and dose verification Bencomo, José A. Chu, Connel Tello, Victor M. Cho, Sang Hyun Ibbott, Geoffrey S. J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics An evaluation of two anthropomorphic breast phantoms, which have been designed for quality assurance and dose verification of radiotherapy treatment of breast cancer patients, is presented. These phantoms are identical in terms of their dimensions and shape and composed of several layers of either Plastic Water™ or tissue‐equivalent material. Both water‐and tissue‐equivalent phantoms include lung‐ and rib‐equivalent components. The phantoms simulate large, medium and small breasts. The value of the phantoms as breast treatment quality assurance tools was assessed by dose measurements with ionization chamber and thermoluminescence dosimeters (TLD) at different points inside the phantom. Measurements were made by irradiating the phantoms under conditions representing the different treatment techniques found by the Radiological Physics Center (RPC) during its dosimetry quality audits. Most irradiations were performed with the water‐equivalent breast phantom. One experiment was performed under consistent irradiation conditions to compare the tissue‐equivalent phantom with the water‐equivalent phantom. Measurements were compared with the dose estimated by the RPC's manual calculations used to check clinical charts of patients entered in a National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) protocol. Measurements were also compared with isodose distributions generated by a commercial radiation treatment planning (RTP) system. In the homogeneous three‐dimensional (3‐D) phantom, fairly good agreement (within 5%) was observed at the NSABP dose prescription point between measurements and 2‐D dose estimation by manual calculations. At the same dose prescription point, but located in the heterogeneous 3‐D phantom, agreement between measurements and a 3‐D RTP system was within about 3%. Manual calculation resulted in overestimation of up to 6%. The general agreement between the TLD measurements and the 2‐D RTP values was within 3% at various off‐axis points, with the exception of a few points far off‐axis, near the high‐dose gradient region at the surface of the phantom. PACS number(s): 87.53Dq, 87.66Xa, 87.53Xd John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2004-05-25 /pmc/articles/PMC5723446/ /pubmed/15753932 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v5i1.1992 Text en © 2004 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Bencomo, José A.
Chu, Connel
Tello, Victor M.
Cho, Sang Hyun
Ibbott, Geoffrey S.
Anthropomorphic breast phantoms for quality assurance and dose verification
title Anthropomorphic breast phantoms for quality assurance and dose verification
title_full Anthropomorphic breast phantoms for quality assurance and dose verification
title_fullStr Anthropomorphic breast phantoms for quality assurance and dose verification
title_full_unstemmed Anthropomorphic breast phantoms for quality assurance and dose verification
title_short Anthropomorphic breast phantoms for quality assurance and dose verification
title_sort anthropomorphic breast phantoms for quality assurance and dose verification
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5723446/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15753932
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v5i1.1992
work_keys_str_mv AT bencomojosea anthropomorphicbreastphantomsforqualityassuranceanddoseverification
AT chuconnel anthropomorphicbreastphantomsforqualityassuranceanddoseverification
AT tellovictorm anthropomorphicbreastphantomsforqualityassuranceanddoseverification
AT chosanghyun anthropomorphicbreastphantomsforqualityassuranceanddoseverification
AT ibbottgeoffreys anthropomorphicbreastphantomsforqualityassuranceanddoseverification