Cargando…
AAPM Task Group 103 report on peer review in clinical radiation oncology physics
This report provides guidelines for a peer review process between two clinical radiation oncology physicists. While the Task Group's work was primarily focused on ensuring timely and productive independent reviews for physicists in solo practice, these guidelines may also be appropriate for phy...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2005
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5723459/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16421500 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v6i4.2142 |
_version_ | 1783285216419250176 |
---|---|
author | Halvorsen, Per H. Das, Indra J. Fraser, Martin Freedman, D. Jay Rice, Robert E. Ibbott, Geoffrey S. Parsai, E. Ishmael Robin, T. Tydings Thomadsen, Bruce R. |
author_facet | Halvorsen, Per H. Das, Indra J. Fraser, Martin Freedman, D. Jay Rice, Robert E. Ibbott, Geoffrey S. Parsai, E. Ishmael Robin, T. Tydings Thomadsen, Bruce R. |
author_sort | Halvorsen, Per H. |
collection | PubMed |
description | This report provides guidelines for a peer review process between two clinical radiation oncology physicists. While the Task Group's work was primarily focused on ensuring timely and productive independent reviews for physicists in solo practice, these guidelines may also be appropriate for physicists in a group setting, particularly when dispersed over multiple separate clinic locations. To ensure that such reviews enable a collegial exchange of professional ideas and productive critique of the entire clinical physics program, the reviews should not be used as an employee evaluation instrument by the employer. Such use is neither intended nor supported by this Task Group. Detailed guidelines are presented on the minimum content of such reviews, as well as a recommended format for reporting the findings of a review. In consideration of the full schedules faced by most clinical physicists, the process outlined herein was designed to be completed in one working day. PACS numbers: 87.53.Xd, 87.90.+y |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5723459 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2005 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57234592018-04-02 AAPM Task Group 103 report on peer review in clinical radiation oncology physics Halvorsen, Per H. Das, Indra J. Fraser, Martin Freedman, D. Jay Rice, Robert E. Ibbott, Geoffrey S. Parsai, E. Ishmael Robin, T. Tydings Thomadsen, Bruce R. J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics This report provides guidelines for a peer review process between two clinical radiation oncology physicists. While the Task Group's work was primarily focused on ensuring timely and productive independent reviews for physicists in solo practice, these guidelines may also be appropriate for physicists in a group setting, particularly when dispersed over multiple separate clinic locations. To ensure that such reviews enable a collegial exchange of professional ideas and productive critique of the entire clinical physics program, the reviews should not be used as an employee evaluation instrument by the employer. Such use is neither intended nor supported by this Task Group. Detailed guidelines are presented on the minimum content of such reviews, as well as a recommended format for reporting the findings of a review. In consideration of the full schedules faced by most clinical physicists, the process outlined herein was designed to be completed in one working day. PACS numbers: 87.53.Xd, 87.90.+y John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2005-11-22 /pmc/articles/PMC5723459/ /pubmed/16421500 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v6i4.2142 Text en © 2005 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Radiation Oncology Physics Halvorsen, Per H. Das, Indra J. Fraser, Martin Freedman, D. Jay Rice, Robert E. Ibbott, Geoffrey S. Parsai, E. Ishmael Robin, T. Tydings Thomadsen, Bruce R. AAPM Task Group 103 report on peer review in clinical radiation oncology physics |
title | AAPM Task Group 103 report on peer review in clinical radiation oncology physics |
title_full | AAPM Task Group 103 report on peer review in clinical radiation oncology physics |
title_fullStr | AAPM Task Group 103 report on peer review in clinical radiation oncology physics |
title_full_unstemmed | AAPM Task Group 103 report on peer review in clinical radiation oncology physics |
title_short | AAPM Task Group 103 report on peer review in clinical radiation oncology physics |
title_sort | aapm task group 103 report on peer review in clinical radiation oncology physics |
topic | Radiation Oncology Physics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5723459/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16421500 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v6i4.2142 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT halvorsenperh aapmtaskgroup103reportonpeerreviewinclinicalradiationoncologyphysics AT dasindraj aapmtaskgroup103reportonpeerreviewinclinicalradiationoncologyphysics AT frasermartin aapmtaskgroup103reportonpeerreviewinclinicalradiationoncologyphysics AT freedmandjay aapmtaskgroup103reportonpeerreviewinclinicalradiationoncologyphysics AT riceroberte aapmtaskgroup103reportonpeerreviewinclinicalradiationoncologyphysics AT ibbottgeoffreys aapmtaskgroup103reportonpeerreviewinclinicalradiationoncologyphysics AT parsaieishmael aapmtaskgroup103reportonpeerreviewinclinicalradiationoncologyphysics AT robinttydings aapmtaskgroup103reportonpeerreviewinclinicalradiationoncologyphysics AT thomadsenbrucer aapmtaskgroup103reportonpeerreviewinclinicalradiationoncologyphysics |