Cargando…

AAPM Task Group 103 report on peer review in clinical radiation oncology physics

This report provides guidelines for a peer review process between two clinical radiation oncology physicists. While the Task Group's work was primarily focused on ensuring timely and productive independent reviews for physicists in solo practice, these guidelines may also be appropriate for phy...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Halvorsen, Per H., Das, Indra J., Fraser, Martin, Freedman, D. Jay, Rice, Robert E., Ibbott, Geoffrey S., Parsai, E. Ishmael, Robin, T. Tydings, Thomadsen, Bruce R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2005
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5723459/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16421500
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v6i4.2142
_version_ 1783285216419250176
author Halvorsen, Per H.
Das, Indra J.
Fraser, Martin
Freedman, D. Jay
Rice, Robert E.
Ibbott, Geoffrey S.
Parsai, E. Ishmael
Robin, T. Tydings
Thomadsen, Bruce R.
author_facet Halvorsen, Per H.
Das, Indra J.
Fraser, Martin
Freedman, D. Jay
Rice, Robert E.
Ibbott, Geoffrey S.
Parsai, E. Ishmael
Robin, T. Tydings
Thomadsen, Bruce R.
author_sort Halvorsen, Per H.
collection PubMed
description This report provides guidelines for a peer review process between two clinical radiation oncology physicists. While the Task Group's work was primarily focused on ensuring timely and productive independent reviews for physicists in solo practice, these guidelines may also be appropriate for physicists in a group setting, particularly when dispersed over multiple separate clinic locations. To ensure that such reviews enable a collegial exchange of professional ideas and productive critique of the entire clinical physics program, the reviews should not be used as an employee evaluation instrument by the employer. Such use is neither intended nor supported by this Task Group. Detailed guidelines are presented on the minimum content of such reviews, as well as a recommended format for reporting the findings of a review. In consideration of the full schedules faced by most clinical physicists, the process outlined herein was designed to be completed in one working day. PACS numbers: 87.53.Xd, 87.90.+y
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5723459
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2005
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57234592018-04-02 AAPM Task Group 103 report on peer review in clinical radiation oncology physics Halvorsen, Per H. Das, Indra J. Fraser, Martin Freedman, D. Jay Rice, Robert E. Ibbott, Geoffrey S. Parsai, E. Ishmael Robin, T. Tydings Thomadsen, Bruce R. J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics This report provides guidelines for a peer review process between two clinical radiation oncology physicists. While the Task Group's work was primarily focused on ensuring timely and productive independent reviews for physicists in solo practice, these guidelines may also be appropriate for physicists in a group setting, particularly when dispersed over multiple separate clinic locations. To ensure that such reviews enable a collegial exchange of professional ideas and productive critique of the entire clinical physics program, the reviews should not be used as an employee evaluation instrument by the employer. Such use is neither intended nor supported by this Task Group. Detailed guidelines are presented on the minimum content of such reviews, as well as a recommended format for reporting the findings of a review. In consideration of the full schedules faced by most clinical physicists, the process outlined herein was designed to be completed in one working day. PACS numbers: 87.53.Xd, 87.90.+y John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2005-11-22 /pmc/articles/PMC5723459/ /pubmed/16421500 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v6i4.2142 Text en © 2005 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Halvorsen, Per H.
Das, Indra J.
Fraser, Martin
Freedman, D. Jay
Rice, Robert E.
Ibbott, Geoffrey S.
Parsai, E. Ishmael
Robin, T. Tydings
Thomadsen, Bruce R.
AAPM Task Group 103 report on peer review in clinical radiation oncology physics
title AAPM Task Group 103 report on peer review in clinical radiation oncology physics
title_full AAPM Task Group 103 report on peer review in clinical radiation oncology physics
title_fullStr AAPM Task Group 103 report on peer review in clinical radiation oncology physics
title_full_unstemmed AAPM Task Group 103 report on peer review in clinical radiation oncology physics
title_short AAPM Task Group 103 report on peer review in clinical radiation oncology physics
title_sort aapm task group 103 report on peer review in clinical radiation oncology physics
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5723459/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16421500
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v6i4.2142
work_keys_str_mv AT halvorsenperh aapmtaskgroup103reportonpeerreviewinclinicalradiationoncologyphysics
AT dasindraj aapmtaskgroup103reportonpeerreviewinclinicalradiationoncologyphysics
AT frasermartin aapmtaskgroup103reportonpeerreviewinclinicalradiationoncologyphysics
AT freedmandjay aapmtaskgroup103reportonpeerreviewinclinicalradiationoncologyphysics
AT riceroberte aapmtaskgroup103reportonpeerreviewinclinicalradiationoncologyphysics
AT ibbottgeoffreys aapmtaskgroup103reportonpeerreviewinclinicalradiationoncologyphysics
AT parsaieishmael aapmtaskgroup103reportonpeerreviewinclinicalradiationoncologyphysics
AT robinttydings aapmtaskgroup103reportonpeerreviewinclinicalradiationoncologyphysics
AT thomadsenbrucer aapmtaskgroup103reportonpeerreviewinclinicalradiationoncologyphysics