Cargando…

Surface buildup dose dependence on photon field delivery technique for IMRT

The more complex delivery techniques required for implementation of intensity‐modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) based on inverse planning optimization have changed the relationship between dose at depth and dose at buildup regions near the surface. Surface buildup dose is dependent on electron contamina...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yokoyama, Shigeru, Roberson, Peter L., Litzenberg, Dale W., Moran, Jean M., Fraass, Benedick A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2004
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5723466/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15738914
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v5i2.1966
Descripción
Sumario:The more complex delivery techniques required for implementation of intensity‐modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) based on inverse planning optimization have changed the relationship between dose at depth and dose at buildup regions near the surface. Surface buildup dose is dependent on electron contamination primarily from the unblocked view of the flattening filter and secondarily from air and collimation systems. To evaluate the impact of beam segmentation on buildup dose, measurements were performed with [Formula: see text] fields, which were delivered with 3 static [Formula: see text] or [Formula: see text] strips, 5 static [Formula: see text] strips, 10 static [Formula: see text] strips, and [Formula: see text] dynamic delivery, compared with a [Formula: see text] open field. Measurements were performed in water and Solid Water using parallel plate chambers, a stereotactic diode, and thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs) for a 6 MV X‐ray beam. Depth doses at 2 mm depth (relative to dose at 10 cm depth) were lower by 6%, 7%, 11%, and 10% for the above field delivery techniques, respectively, compared to the open field. These differences are most influenced by differences in multileaf collimator (MLC) transmission contributing to the useful beam. An example IMRT field was also studied to assess variations due to delivery technique (static vs. dynamic) and intensity level. Buildup dose is weakly dependent on the multileaf delivery technique for efficient IMRT fields. PACS numbers: 87.53.‐j, 87.53.Dq