Cargando…

Surface buildup dose dependence on photon field delivery technique for IMRT

The more complex delivery techniques required for implementation of intensity‐modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) based on inverse planning optimization have changed the relationship between dose at depth and dose at buildup regions near the surface. Surface buildup dose is dependent on electron contamina...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yokoyama, Shigeru, Roberson, Peter L., Litzenberg, Dale W., Moran, Jean M., Fraass, Benedick A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2004
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5723466/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15738914
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v5i2.1966
_version_ 1783285218076000256
author Yokoyama, Shigeru
Roberson, Peter L.
Litzenberg, Dale W.
Moran, Jean M.
Fraass, Benedick A.
author_facet Yokoyama, Shigeru
Roberson, Peter L.
Litzenberg, Dale W.
Moran, Jean M.
Fraass, Benedick A.
author_sort Yokoyama, Shigeru
collection PubMed
description The more complex delivery techniques required for implementation of intensity‐modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) based on inverse planning optimization have changed the relationship between dose at depth and dose at buildup regions near the surface. Surface buildup dose is dependent on electron contamination primarily from the unblocked view of the flattening filter and secondarily from air and collimation systems. To evaluate the impact of beam segmentation on buildup dose, measurements were performed with [Formula: see text] fields, which were delivered with 3 static [Formula: see text] or [Formula: see text] strips, 5 static [Formula: see text] strips, 10 static [Formula: see text] strips, and [Formula: see text] dynamic delivery, compared with a [Formula: see text] open field. Measurements were performed in water and Solid Water using parallel plate chambers, a stereotactic diode, and thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs) for a 6 MV X‐ray beam. Depth doses at 2 mm depth (relative to dose at 10 cm depth) were lower by 6%, 7%, 11%, and 10% for the above field delivery techniques, respectively, compared to the open field. These differences are most influenced by differences in multileaf collimator (MLC) transmission contributing to the useful beam. An example IMRT field was also studied to assess variations due to delivery technique (static vs. dynamic) and intensity level. Buildup dose is weakly dependent on the multileaf delivery technique for efficient IMRT fields. PACS numbers: 87.53.‐j, 87.53.Dq
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5723466
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2004
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57234662018-04-02 Surface buildup dose dependence on photon field delivery technique for IMRT Yokoyama, Shigeru Roberson, Peter L. Litzenberg, Dale W. Moran, Jean M. Fraass, Benedick A. J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics The more complex delivery techniques required for implementation of intensity‐modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) based on inverse planning optimization have changed the relationship between dose at depth and dose at buildup regions near the surface. Surface buildup dose is dependent on electron contamination primarily from the unblocked view of the flattening filter and secondarily from air and collimation systems. To evaluate the impact of beam segmentation on buildup dose, measurements were performed with [Formula: see text] fields, which were delivered with 3 static [Formula: see text] or [Formula: see text] strips, 5 static [Formula: see text] strips, 10 static [Formula: see text] strips, and [Formula: see text] dynamic delivery, compared with a [Formula: see text] open field. Measurements were performed in water and Solid Water using parallel plate chambers, a stereotactic diode, and thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs) for a 6 MV X‐ray beam. Depth doses at 2 mm depth (relative to dose at 10 cm depth) were lower by 6%, 7%, 11%, and 10% for the above field delivery techniques, respectively, compared to the open field. These differences are most influenced by differences in multileaf collimator (MLC) transmission contributing to the useful beam. An example IMRT field was also studied to assess variations due to delivery technique (static vs. dynamic) and intensity level. Buildup dose is weakly dependent on the multileaf delivery technique for efficient IMRT fields. PACS numbers: 87.53.‐j, 87.53.Dq John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2004-08-16 /pmc/articles/PMC5723466/ /pubmed/15738914 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v5i2.1966 Text en © 2004 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Yokoyama, Shigeru
Roberson, Peter L.
Litzenberg, Dale W.
Moran, Jean M.
Fraass, Benedick A.
Surface buildup dose dependence on photon field delivery technique for IMRT
title Surface buildup dose dependence on photon field delivery technique for IMRT
title_full Surface buildup dose dependence on photon field delivery technique for IMRT
title_fullStr Surface buildup dose dependence on photon field delivery technique for IMRT
title_full_unstemmed Surface buildup dose dependence on photon field delivery technique for IMRT
title_short Surface buildup dose dependence on photon field delivery technique for IMRT
title_sort surface buildup dose dependence on photon field delivery technique for imrt
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5723466/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15738914
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v5i2.1966
work_keys_str_mv AT yokoyamashigeru surfacebuildupdosedependenceonphotonfielddeliverytechniqueforimrt
AT robersonpeterl surfacebuildupdosedependenceonphotonfielddeliverytechniqueforimrt
AT litzenbergdalew surfacebuildupdosedependenceonphotonfielddeliverytechniqueforimrt
AT moranjeanm surfacebuildupdosedependenceonphotonfielddeliverytechniqueforimrt
AT fraassbenedicka surfacebuildupdosedependenceonphotonfielddeliverytechniqueforimrt