Cargando…
Surface buildup dose dependence on photon field delivery technique for IMRT
The more complex delivery techniques required for implementation of intensity‐modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) based on inverse planning optimization have changed the relationship between dose at depth and dose at buildup regions near the surface. Surface buildup dose is dependent on electron contamina...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2004
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5723466/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15738914 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v5i2.1966 |
_version_ | 1783285218076000256 |
---|---|
author | Yokoyama, Shigeru Roberson, Peter L. Litzenberg, Dale W. Moran, Jean M. Fraass, Benedick A. |
author_facet | Yokoyama, Shigeru Roberson, Peter L. Litzenberg, Dale W. Moran, Jean M. Fraass, Benedick A. |
author_sort | Yokoyama, Shigeru |
collection | PubMed |
description | The more complex delivery techniques required for implementation of intensity‐modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) based on inverse planning optimization have changed the relationship between dose at depth and dose at buildup regions near the surface. Surface buildup dose is dependent on electron contamination primarily from the unblocked view of the flattening filter and secondarily from air and collimation systems. To evaluate the impact of beam segmentation on buildup dose, measurements were performed with [Formula: see text] fields, which were delivered with 3 static [Formula: see text] or [Formula: see text] strips, 5 static [Formula: see text] strips, 10 static [Formula: see text] strips, and [Formula: see text] dynamic delivery, compared with a [Formula: see text] open field. Measurements were performed in water and Solid Water using parallel plate chambers, a stereotactic diode, and thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs) for a 6 MV X‐ray beam. Depth doses at 2 mm depth (relative to dose at 10 cm depth) were lower by 6%, 7%, 11%, and 10% for the above field delivery techniques, respectively, compared to the open field. These differences are most influenced by differences in multileaf collimator (MLC) transmission contributing to the useful beam. An example IMRT field was also studied to assess variations due to delivery technique (static vs. dynamic) and intensity level. Buildup dose is weakly dependent on the multileaf delivery technique for efficient IMRT fields. PACS numbers: 87.53.‐j, 87.53.Dq |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5723466 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2004 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57234662018-04-02 Surface buildup dose dependence on photon field delivery technique for IMRT Yokoyama, Shigeru Roberson, Peter L. Litzenberg, Dale W. Moran, Jean M. Fraass, Benedick A. J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics The more complex delivery techniques required for implementation of intensity‐modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) based on inverse planning optimization have changed the relationship between dose at depth and dose at buildup regions near the surface. Surface buildup dose is dependent on electron contamination primarily from the unblocked view of the flattening filter and secondarily from air and collimation systems. To evaluate the impact of beam segmentation on buildup dose, measurements were performed with [Formula: see text] fields, which were delivered with 3 static [Formula: see text] or [Formula: see text] strips, 5 static [Formula: see text] strips, 10 static [Formula: see text] strips, and [Formula: see text] dynamic delivery, compared with a [Formula: see text] open field. Measurements were performed in water and Solid Water using parallel plate chambers, a stereotactic diode, and thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs) for a 6 MV X‐ray beam. Depth doses at 2 mm depth (relative to dose at 10 cm depth) were lower by 6%, 7%, 11%, and 10% for the above field delivery techniques, respectively, compared to the open field. These differences are most influenced by differences in multileaf collimator (MLC) transmission contributing to the useful beam. An example IMRT field was also studied to assess variations due to delivery technique (static vs. dynamic) and intensity level. Buildup dose is weakly dependent on the multileaf delivery technique for efficient IMRT fields. PACS numbers: 87.53.‐j, 87.53.Dq John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2004-08-16 /pmc/articles/PMC5723466/ /pubmed/15738914 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v5i2.1966 Text en © 2004 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Radiation Oncology Physics Yokoyama, Shigeru Roberson, Peter L. Litzenberg, Dale W. Moran, Jean M. Fraass, Benedick A. Surface buildup dose dependence on photon field delivery technique for IMRT |
title | Surface buildup dose dependence on photon field delivery technique for IMRT |
title_full | Surface buildup dose dependence on photon field delivery technique for IMRT |
title_fullStr | Surface buildup dose dependence on photon field delivery technique for IMRT |
title_full_unstemmed | Surface buildup dose dependence on photon field delivery technique for IMRT |
title_short | Surface buildup dose dependence on photon field delivery technique for IMRT |
title_sort | surface buildup dose dependence on photon field delivery technique for imrt |
topic | Radiation Oncology Physics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5723466/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15738914 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v5i2.1966 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yokoyamashigeru surfacebuildupdosedependenceonphotonfielddeliverytechniqueforimrt AT robersonpeterl surfacebuildupdosedependenceonphotonfielddeliverytechniqueforimrt AT litzenbergdalew surfacebuildupdosedependenceonphotonfielddeliverytechniqueforimrt AT moranjeanm surfacebuildupdosedependenceonphotonfielddeliverytechniqueforimrt AT fraassbenedicka surfacebuildupdosedependenceonphotonfielddeliverytechniqueforimrt |