Cargando…
Interfractional anatomic variation in patients treated with respiration‐gated radiotherapy
As quality assurance for respiration‐gated treatments using the Varian RPM™ system, we monitor interfractional diaphragm variation throughout treatment using extra anterior‐posterior (AP) portal images. We measure the superior‐inferior (SI) distance between one or more bony landmarks and the ipsilat...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2005
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5723469/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15940209 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v6i2.2048 |
_version_ | 1783285218822586368 |
---|---|
author | Yorke, Ellen Rosenzweig, Kenneth E. Wagman, Raquel Mageras, Gikas S. |
author_facet | Yorke, Ellen Rosenzweig, Kenneth E. Wagman, Raquel Mageras, Gikas S. |
author_sort | Yorke, Ellen |
collection | PubMed |
description | As quality assurance for respiration‐gated treatments using the Varian RPM™ system, we monitor interfractional diaphragm variation throughout treatment using extra anterior‐posterior (AP) portal images. We measure the superior‐inferior (SI) distance between one or more bony landmarks and the ipsilateral diaphragm dome in each such radiograph and calculate its difference, D, from the corresponding distance in a planning CT scan digitally reconstructed radiograph (DRR). For each patient, the mean of D represents the systematic diaphragm displacement, and the standard deviation of D represents random diaphragm variations and is a measure of interfractional gating reproducibility. We present results for 31 sequential patients (21 lung, 10 liver tumors), each with at least 8 such portal images. For all patients, the gate included end‐exhale. The patient‐specific duty cycle ranged from 30% to 60%. All patients received customized audio prompting for simulation and treatment, and 14 patients also received visual prompting. Respiration‐synchronized fluoroscopic movies taken at a conventional simulator revealed patient‐specific diaphragm excursions from 1.0 cm to 5.0 cm and diaphragm excursion within the gate from 0.5 cm to 1.0 cm, demonstrating a significant reduction of intra‐fractional diaphragm (and by inference tumor) motion by respiratory gating. One standard deviation of the systematic displacement (the mean of D) was 0.63 cm and 0.48 cm for the lung and liver patient groups, respectively. The average [Formula: see text] SD of the random displacements (i.e., the average of the standard deviations of D) was [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] for the two groups, respectively. The similar magnitude of the systematic and random displacements suggests that both derive from a common distribution of interfractional variations. Combining visual with audio prompting did not significantly improve performance, as judged by D. Guided by these portal images, field changes were made during the course of treatment for 6 patients (1 lung, 5 liver). PACS numbers: 87.53.‐j, 87.53.Oq |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5723469 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2005 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57234692018-04-02 Interfractional anatomic variation in patients treated with respiration‐gated radiotherapy Yorke, Ellen Rosenzweig, Kenneth E. Wagman, Raquel Mageras, Gikas S. J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics As quality assurance for respiration‐gated treatments using the Varian RPM™ system, we monitor interfractional diaphragm variation throughout treatment using extra anterior‐posterior (AP) portal images. We measure the superior‐inferior (SI) distance between one or more bony landmarks and the ipsilateral diaphragm dome in each such radiograph and calculate its difference, D, from the corresponding distance in a planning CT scan digitally reconstructed radiograph (DRR). For each patient, the mean of D represents the systematic diaphragm displacement, and the standard deviation of D represents random diaphragm variations and is a measure of interfractional gating reproducibility. We present results for 31 sequential patients (21 lung, 10 liver tumors), each with at least 8 such portal images. For all patients, the gate included end‐exhale. The patient‐specific duty cycle ranged from 30% to 60%. All patients received customized audio prompting for simulation and treatment, and 14 patients also received visual prompting. Respiration‐synchronized fluoroscopic movies taken at a conventional simulator revealed patient‐specific diaphragm excursions from 1.0 cm to 5.0 cm and diaphragm excursion within the gate from 0.5 cm to 1.0 cm, demonstrating a significant reduction of intra‐fractional diaphragm (and by inference tumor) motion by respiratory gating. One standard deviation of the systematic displacement (the mean of D) was 0.63 cm and 0.48 cm for the lung and liver patient groups, respectively. The average [Formula: see text] SD of the random displacements (i.e., the average of the standard deviations of D) was [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] for the two groups, respectively. The similar magnitude of the systematic and random displacements suggests that both derive from a common distribution of interfractional variations. Combining visual with audio prompting did not significantly improve performance, as judged by D. Guided by these portal images, field changes were made during the course of treatment for 6 patients (1 lung, 5 liver). PACS numbers: 87.53.‐j, 87.53.Oq John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2005-05-21 /pmc/articles/PMC5723469/ /pubmed/15940209 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v6i2.2048 Text en © 2005 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Radiation Oncology Physics Yorke, Ellen Rosenzweig, Kenneth E. Wagman, Raquel Mageras, Gikas S. Interfractional anatomic variation in patients treated with respiration‐gated radiotherapy |
title | Interfractional anatomic variation in patients treated with respiration‐gated radiotherapy |
title_full | Interfractional anatomic variation in patients treated with respiration‐gated radiotherapy |
title_fullStr | Interfractional anatomic variation in patients treated with respiration‐gated radiotherapy |
title_full_unstemmed | Interfractional anatomic variation in patients treated with respiration‐gated radiotherapy |
title_short | Interfractional anatomic variation in patients treated with respiration‐gated radiotherapy |
title_sort | interfractional anatomic variation in patients treated with respiration‐gated radiotherapy |
topic | Radiation Oncology Physics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5723469/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15940209 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v6i2.2048 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yorkeellen interfractionalanatomicvariationinpatientstreatedwithrespirationgatedradiotherapy AT rosenzweigkennethe interfractionalanatomicvariationinpatientstreatedwithrespirationgatedradiotherapy AT wagmanraquel interfractionalanatomicvariationinpatientstreatedwithrespirationgatedradiotherapy AT magerasgikass interfractionalanatomicvariationinpatientstreatedwithrespirationgatedradiotherapy |