Cargando…

Interfractional anatomic variation in patients treated with respiration‐gated radiotherapy

As quality assurance for respiration‐gated treatments using the Varian RPM™ system, we monitor interfractional diaphragm variation throughout treatment using extra anterior‐posterior (AP) portal images. We measure the superior‐inferior (SI) distance between one or more bony landmarks and the ipsilat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yorke, Ellen, Rosenzweig, Kenneth E., Wagman, Raquel, Mageras, Gikas S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2005
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5723469/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15940209
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v6i2.2048
_version_ 1783285218822586368
author Yorke, Ellen
Rosenzweig, Kenneth E.
Wagman, Raquel
Mageras, Gikas S.
author_facet Yorke, Ellen
Rosenzweig, Kenneth E.
Wagman, Raquel
Mageras, Gikas S.
author_sort Yorke, Ellen
collection PubMed
description As quality assurance for respiration‐gated treatments using the Varian RPM™ system, we monitor interfractional diaphragm variation throughout treatment using extra anterior‐posterior (AP) portal images. We measure the superior‐inferior (SI) distance between one or more bony landmarks and the ipsilateral diaphragm dome in each such radiograph and calculate its difference, D, from the corresponding distance in a planning CT scan digitally reconstructed radiograph (DRR). For each patient, the mean of D represents the systematic diaphragm displacement, and the standard deviation of D represents random diaphragm variations and is a measure of interfractional gating reproducibility. We present results for 31 sequential patients (21 lung, 10 liver tumors), each with at least 8 such portal images. For all patients, the gate included end‐exhale. The patient‐specific duty cycle ranged from 30% to 60%. All patients received customized audio prompting for simulation and treatment, and 14 patients also received visual prompting. Respiration‐synchronized fluoroscopic movies taken at a conventional simulator revealed patient‐specific diaphragm excursions from 1.0 cm to 5.0 cm and diaphragm excursion within the gate from 0.5 cm to 1.0 cm, demonstrating a significant reduction of intra‐fractional diaphragm (and by inference tumor) motion by respiratory gating. One standard deviation of the systematic displacement (the mean of D) was 0.63 cm and 0.48 cm for the lung and liver patient groups, respectively. The average [Formula: see text] SD of the random displacements (i.e., the average of the standard deviations of D) was [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] for the two groups, respectively. The similar magnitude of the systematic and random displacements suggests that both derive from a common distribution of interfractional variations. Combining visual with audio prompting did not significantly improve performance, as judged by D. Guided by these portal images, field changes were made during the course of treatment for 6 patients (1 lung, 5 liver). PACS numbers: 87.53.‐j, 87.53.Oq
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5723469
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2005
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57234692018-04-02 Interfractional anatomic variation in patients treated with respiration‐gated radiotherapy Yorke, Ellen Rosenzweig, Kenneth E. Wagman, Raquel Mageras, Gikas S. J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics As quality assurance for respiration‐gated treatments using the Varian RPM™ system, we monitor interfractional diaphragm variation throughout treatment using extra anterior‐posterior (AP) portal images. We measure the superior‐inferior (SI) distance between one or more bony landmarks and the ipsilateral diaphragm dome in each such radiograph and calculate its difference, D, from the corresponding distance in a planning CT scan digitally reconstructed radiograph (DRR). For each patient, the mean of D represents the systematic diaphragm displacement, and the standard deviation of D represents random diaphragm variations and is a measure of interfractional gating reproducibility. We present results for 31 sequential patients (21 lung, 10 liver tumors), each with at least 8 such portal images. For all patients, the gate included end‐exhale. The patient‐specific duty cycle ranged from 30% to 60%. All patients received customized audio prompting for simulation and treatment, and 14 patients also received visual prompting. Respiration‐synchronized fluoroscopic movies taken at a conventional simulator revealed patient‐specific diaphragm excursions from 1.0 cm to 5.0 cm and diaphragm excursion within the gate from 0.5 cm to 1.0 cm, demonstrating a significant reduction of intra‐fractional diaphragm (and by inference tumor) motion by respiratory gating. One standard deviation of the systematic displacement (the mean of D) was 0.63 cm and 0.48 cm for the lung and liver patient groups, respectively. The average [Formula: see text] SD of the random displacements (i.e., the average of the standard deviations of D) was [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] for the two groups, respectively. The similar magnitude of the systematic and random displacements suggests that both derive from a common distribution of interfractional variations. Combining visual with audio prompting did not significantly improve performance, as judged by D. Guided by these portal images, field changes were made during the course of treatment for 6 patients (1 lung, 5 liver). PACS numbers: 87.53.‐j, 87.53.Oq John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2005-05-21 /pmc/articles/PMC5723469/ /pubmed/15940209 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v6i2.2048 Text en © 2005 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Yorke, Ellen
Rosenzweig, Kenneth E.
Wagman, Raquel
Mageras, Gikas S.
Interfractional anatomic variation in patients treated with respiration‐gated radiotherapy
title Interfractional anatomic variation in patients treated with respiration‐gated radiotherapy
title_full Interfractional anatomic variation in patients treated with respiration‐gated radiotherapy
title_fullStr Interfractional anatomic variation in patients treated with respiration‐gated radiotherapy
title_full_unstemmed Interfractional anatomic variation in patients treated with respiration‐gated radiotherapy
title_short Interfractional anatomic variation in patients treated with respiration‐gated radiotherapy
title_sort interfractional anatomic variation in patients treated with respiration‐gated radiotherapy
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5723469/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15940209
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v6i2.2048
work_keys_str_mv AT yorkeellen interfractionalanatomicvariationinpatientstreatedwithrespirationgatedradiotherapy
AT rosenzweigkennethe interfractionalanatomicvariationinpatientstreatedwithrespirationgatedradiotherapy
AT wagmanraquel interfractionalanatomicvariationinpatientstreatedwithrespirationgatedradiotherapy
AT magerasgikass interfractionalanatomicvariationinpatientstreatedwithrespirationgatedradiotherapy