Cargando…

Quality assurance evaluation of delivery of respiratory‐gated treatments

We describe a method for evaluating the quality of respiratory‐gated radiation delivery using a commercially available device. During irradiation, gating traces for one field for each treatment were extracted from the system for each of 14 patients. The data were then transferred to a spreadsheet. S...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cardenas, Alex, Fontenot, Jonas, Forster, Kenneth M., Stevens, Craig W., Starkschall, George
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2004
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5723481/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15753939
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v5i3.2002
_version_ 1783285221711413248
author Cardenas, Alex
Fontenot, Jonas
Forster, Kenneth M.
Stevens, Craig W.
Starkschall, George
author_facet Cardenas, Alex
Fontenot, Jonas
Forster, Kenneth M.
Stevens, Craig W.
Starkschall, George
author_sort Cardenas, Alex
collection PubMed
description We describe a method for evaluating the quality of respiratory‐gated radiation delivery using a commercially available device. During irradiation, gating traces for one field for each treatment were extracted from the system for each of 14 patients. The data were then transferred to a spreadsheet. Software was developed to evaluate the following parameters: duty cycle, amplitude of fiducial motion, fraction of amplitude of motion during gated delivery, and respiratory cycle time. Criteria were established for acceptability of gating traces. In our sample, over 85% of the traces indicated acceptability. An example of results for one patient extracted from analyzed gating traces is as follows: mean duty cycle, 57%; average amplitude of motion, 0.89 cm; average fraction of motion during gated delivery, 0.45; mean respiratory cycle time, 4.5 s. This technique can be used to evaluate delivery of respiratory‐gated radiation therapy for quality assurance purposes and to assess various techniques for improving delivery of gated therapy. A hard copy of the gating traces can be used to document gated treatment delivery for potential billing of the gated delivery process. PACS numbers: 87.53‐j, 87.53.Tf
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5723481
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2004
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57234812018-04-02 Quality assurance evaluation of delivery of respiratory‐gated treatments Cardenas, Alex Fontenot, Jonas Forster, Kenneth M. Stevens, Craig W. Starkschall, George J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics We describe a method for evaluating the quality of respiratory‐gated radiation delivery using a commercially available device. During irradiation, gating traces for one field for each treatment were extracted from the system for each of 14 patients. The data were then transferred to a spreadsheet. Software was developed to evaluate the following parameters: duty cycle, amplitude of fiducial motion, fraction of amplitude of motion during gated delivery, and respiratory cycle time. Criteria were established for acceptability of gating traces. In our sample, over 85% of the traces indicated acceptability. An example of results for one patient extracted from analyzed gating traces is as follows: mean duty cycle, 57%; average amplitude of motion, 0.89 cm; average fraction of motion during gated delivery, 0.45; mean respiratory cycle time, 4.5 s. This technique can be used to evaluate delivery of respiratory‐gated radiation therapy for quality assurance purposes and to assess various techniques for improving delivery of gated therapy. A hard copy of the gating traces can be used to document gated treatment delivery for potential billing of the gated delivery process. PACS numbers: 87.53‐j, 87.53.Tf John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2004-10-21 /pmc/articles/PMC5723481/ /pubmed/15753939 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v5i3.2002 Text en © 2004 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Cardenas, Alex
Fontenot, Jonas
Forster, Kenneth M.
Stevens, Craig W.
Starkschall, George
Quality assurance evaluation of delivery of respiratory‐gated treatments
title Quality assurance evaluation of delivery of respiratory‐gated treatments
title_full Quality assurance evaluation of delivery of respiratory‐gated treatments
title_fullStr Quality assurance evaluation of delivery of respiratory‐gated treatments
title_full_unstemmed Quality assurance evaluation of delivery of respiratory‐gated treatments
title_short Quality assurance evaluation of delivery of respiratory‐gated treatments
title_sort quality assurance evaluation of delivery of respiratory‐gated treatments
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5723481/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15753939
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v5i3.2002
work_keys_str_mv AT cardenasalex qualityassuranceevaluationofdeliveryofrespiratorygatedtreatments
AT fontenotjonas qualityassuranceevaluationofdeliveryofrespiratorygatedtreatments
AT forsterkennethm qualityassuranceevaluationofdeliveryofrespiratorygatedtreatments
AT stevenscraigw qualityassuranceevaluationofdeliveryofrespiratorygatedtreatments
AT starkschallgeorge qualityassuranceevaluationofdeliveryofrespiratorygatedtreatments