Cargando…

Compensators: An alternative IMRT delivery technique

Seven years of experience in compensator intensity‐modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) clinical implementation are presented. An inverse planning dose optimization algorithm was used to generate intensity modulation maps, which were delivered via either the compensator or segmental multileaf collimator (M...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chang, Sha X., Cullip, Timothy J., Deschesne, Katharin M., Miller, Elizabeth P., Rosenman, Julian G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2004
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5723484/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15753937
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v5i3.1965
_version_ 1783285222401376256
author Chang, Sha X.
Cullip, Timothy J.
Deschesne, Katharin M.
Miller, Elizabeth P.
Rosenman, Julian G.
author_facet Chang, Sha X.
Cullip, Timothy J.
Deschesne, Katharin M.
Miller, Elizabeth P.
Rosenman, Julian G.
author_sort Chang, Sha X.
collection PubMed
description Seven years of experience in compensator intensity‐modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) clinical implementation are presented. An inverse planning dose optimization algorithm was used to generate intensity modulation maps, which were delivered via either the compensator or segmental multileaf collimator (MLC) IMRT techniques. The in‐house developed compensator‐IMRT technique is presented with the focus on several design issues. The dosimetry of the delivery techniques was analyzed for several clinical cases. The treatment time for both delivery techniques on Siemens accelerators was retrospectively analyzed based on the electronic treatment record in LANTIS for 95 patients. We found that the compensator technique consistently took noticeably less time for treatment of equal numbers of fields compared to the segmental technique. The typical time needed to fabricate a compensator was 13 min, 3 min of which was manual processing. More than 80% of the approximately 700 compensators evaluated had a maximum deviation of less than 5% from the calculation in intensity profile. Seventy‐two percent of the patient treatment dosimetry measurements for 340 patients have an error of no more than 5%. The pros and cons of different IMRT compensator materials are also discussed. Our experience shows that the compensator‐IMRT technique offers robustness, excellent intensity modulation resolution, high treatment delivery efficiency, simple fabrication and quality assurance (QA) procedures, and the flexibility to be used in any teletherapy unit. PACS numbers: 87.53Mr, 87.53Tf
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5723484
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2004
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57234842018-04-02 Compensators: An alternative IMRT delivery technique Chang, Sha X. Cullip, Timothy J. Deschesne, Katharin M. Miller, Elizabeth P. Rosenman, Julian G. J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics Seven years of experience in compensator intensity‐modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) clinical implementation are presented. An inverse planning dose optimization algorithm was used to generate intensity modulation maps, which were delivered via either the compensator or segmental multileaf collimator (MLC) IMRT techniques. The in‐house developed compensator‐IMRT technique is presented with the focus on several design issues. The dosimetry of the delivery techniques was analyzed for several clinical cases. The treatment time for both delivery techniques on Siemens accelerators was retrospectively analyzed based on the electronic treatment record in LANTIS for 95 patients. We found that the compensator technique consistently took noticeably less time for treatment of equal numbers of fields compared to the segmental technique. The typical time needed to fabricate a compensator was 13 min, 3 min of which was manual processing. More than 80% of the approximately 700 compensators evaluated had a maximum deviation of less than 5% from the calculation in intensity profile. Seventy‐two percent of the patient treatment dosimetry measurements for 340 patients have an error of no more than 5%. The pros and cons of different IMRT compensator materials are also discussed. Our experience shows that the compensator‐IMRT technique offers robustness, excellent intensity modulation resolution, high treatment delivery efficiency, simple fabrication and quality assurance (QA) procedures, and the flexibility to be used in any teletherapy unit. PACS numbers: 87.53Mr, 87.53Tf John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2004-10-21 /pmc/articles/PMC5723484/ /pubmed/15753937 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v5i3.1965 Text en © 2004 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Chang, Sha X.
Cullip, Timothy J.
Deschesne, Katharin M.
Miller, Elizabeth P.
Rosenman, Julian G.
Compensators: An alternative IMRT delivery technique
title Compensators: An alternative IMRT delivery technique
title_full Compensators: An alternative IMRT delivery technique
title_fullStr Compensators: An alternative IMRT delivery technique
title_full_unstemmed Compensators: An alternative IMRT delivery technique
title_short Compensators: An alternative IMRT delivery technique
title_sort compensators: an alternative imrt delivery technique
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5723484/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15753937
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v5i3.1965
work_keys_str_mv AT changshax compensatorsanalternativeimrtdeliverytechnique
AT culliptimothyj compensatorsanalternativeimrtdeliverytechnique
AT deschesnekatharinm compensatorsanalternativeimrtdeliverytechnique
AT millerelizabethp compensatorsanalternativeimrtdeliverytechnique
AT rosenmanjuliang compensatorsanalternativeimrtdeliverytechnique