Cargando…

Commissioning and quality assurance for intensity‐modulated radiotherapy with dynamic multileaf collimator: Experience of the Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile

The objective of this paper is to present our experience in the commissioning and quality assurance (QA) for intensity‐modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) using the dynamic multileaf collimator (dMLC), sliding window technique. The connectivity and operation between all IMRT chain components were checked...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Venencia, Carlos Daniel, Besa, Pelayo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2004
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5723486/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15753938
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v5i3.1982
_version_ 1783285222873235456
author Venencia, Carlos Daniel
Besa, Pelayo
author_facet Venencia, Carlos Daniel
Besa, Pelayo
author_sort Venencia, Carlos Daniel
collection PubMed
description The objective of this paper is to present our experience in the commissioning and quality assurance (QA) for intensity‐modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) using the dynamic multileaf collimator (dMLC), sliding window technique. The connectivity and operation between all IMRT chain components were checked on the Varian equipment. Then the following tests were performed: stability of leaf positioning and leaf speed, sensitivity to treatment interruptions (acceleration and deceleration), evaluation of standard field patterns, stability of dMLC output, segmental dose accuracy check, average leaf transmission, dosimetric leaf separation, effects of lateral disequilibrium between adjacent leaves in dose profiles, and multiple carriage field verification. Standard patterns were generated for verification: uniform field, pyramid, hole, wedge, peaks, and chair. Weekly QA protocol includes sweeping gap output, garden fence test (narrow bands, 2 mm wide, of exposure spaced at 2‐cm intervals), and segmental dose accuracy check. Monthly QA includes sweeping gap output at multiple gantry and collimator angles, sweeping gap off‐axis output, picket fence test (eight consecutive movements of a 5‐cm wide rectangular field spaced at 5‐cm intervals), stability of leaf speed and leaf motor current test (PWM test). Our patient QA procedure consists of an absolute dose measurement for all treatment fields in the treatment condition, analysis of actual leaf position versus planned leaf position (dynalog files) for each treatment field, film relative dose determination for each field, film relative dose determination for the plan (all treatment fields) in two axial planes, and patient positioning verification with orthogonal films. The tests performed showed acceptable results. After over one year of IMRT treatment, the routine QA machine checks confirmed the precision and stability of the IMRT system. PACS number: 87.53.Xd, 87.53.Dq, 87.53.Mr
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5723486
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2004
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57234862018-04-02 Commissioning and quality assurance for intensity‐modulated radiotherapy with dynamic multileaf collimator: Experience of the Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile Venencia, Carlos Daniel Besa, Pelayo J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics The objective of this paper is to present our experience in the commissioning and quality assurance (QA) for intensity‐modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) using the dynamic multileaf collimator (dMLC), sliding window technique. The connectivity and operation between all IMRT chain components were checked on the Varian equipment. Then the following tests were performed: stability of leaf positioning and leaf speed, sensitivity to treatment interruptions (acceleration and deceleration), evaluation of standard field patterns, stability of dMLC output, segmental dose accuracy check, average leaf transmission, dosimetric leaf separation, effects of lateral disequilibrium between adjacent leaves in dose profiles, and multiple carriage field verification. Standard patterns were generated for verification: uniform field, pyramid, hole, wedge, peaks, and chair. Weekly QA protocol includes sweeping gap output, garden fence test (narrow bands, 2 mm wide, of exposure spaced at 2‐cm intervals), and segmental dose accuracy check. Monthly QA includes sweeping gap output at multiple gantry and collimator angles, sweeping gap off‐axis output, picket fence test (eight consecutive movements of a 5‐cm wide rectangular field spaced at 5‐cm intervals), stability of leaf speed and leaf motor current test (PWM test). Our patient QA procedure consists of an absolute dose measurement for all treatment fields in the treatment condition, analysis of actual leaf position versus planned leaf position (dynalog files) for each treatment field, film relative dose determination for each field, film relative dose determination for the plan (all treatment fields) in two axial planes, and patient positioning verification with orthogonal films. The tests performed showed acceptable results. After over one year of IMRT treatment, the routine QA machine checks confirmed the precision and stability of the IMRT system. PACS number: 87.53.Xd, 87.53.Dq, 87.53.Mr John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2004-10-21 /pmc/articles/PMC5723486/ /pubmed/15753938 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v5i3.1982 Text en © 2004 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Venencia, Carlos Daniel
Besa, Pelayo
Commissioning and quality assurance for intensity‐modulated radiotherapy with dynamic multileaf collimator: Experience of the Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile
title Commissioning and quality assurance for intensity‐modulated radiotherapy with dynamic multileaf collimator: Experience of the Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile
title_full Commissioning and quality assurance for intensity‐modulated radiotherapy with dynamic multileaf collimator: Experience of the Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile
title_fullStr Commissioning and quality assurance for intensity‐modulated radiotherapy with dynamic multileaf collimator: Experience of the Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile
title_full_unstemmed Commissioning and quality assurance for intensity‐modulated radiotherapy with dynamic multileaf collimator: Experience of the Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile
title_short Commissioning and quality assurance for intensity‐modulated radiotherapy with dynamic multileaf collimator: Experience of the Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile
title_sort commissioning and quality assurance for intensity‐modulated radiotherapy with dynamic multileaf collimator: experience of the pontificia universidad católica de chile
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5723486/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15753938
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v5i3.1982
work_keys_str_mv AT venenciacarlosdaniel commissioningandqualityassuranceforintensitymodulatedradiotherapywithdynamicmultileafcollimatorexperienceofthepontificiauniversidadcatolicadechile
AT besapelayo commissioningandqualityassuranceforintensitymodulatedradiotherapywithdynamicmultileafcollimatorexperienceofthepontificiauniversidadcatolicadechile