Cargando…
Effects of field parameters on IMRT plan quality for gynecological cancer: A case study
Traditional external beam radiotherapy of gynecological cancer consists of a 3D, four‐field‐box technique. The radiation treatment area is a large region of normal tissue, with greater inhomogeneity over the treatment volume, which could benefit more with intensity‐modulated radiation therapy (IMRT)...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2005
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5723493/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16143791 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v6i3.2087 |
_version_ | 1783285224548859904 |
---|---|
author | Fung, Albert Y.C. Enke, Charles A. Ayyangar, Komanduri M. Thompson, Robert B. Zhen, Weining Raman, Natarajan V. Djajaputra, David Li, Sicong Nehru, Ramasamy M. Pillai, Sushakumari Sourivong, Paul Headley, Mary Yager, Ann L. |
author_facet | Fung, Albert Y.C. Enke, Charles A. Ayyangar, Komanduri M. Thompson, Robert B. Zhen, Weining Raman, Natarajan V. Djajaputra, David Li, Sicong Nehru, Ramasamy M. Pillai, Sushakumari Sourivong, Paul Headley, Mary Yager, Ann L. |
author_sort | Fung, Albert Y.C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Traditional external beam radiotherapy of gynecological cancer consists of a 3D, four‐field‐box technique. The radiation treatment area is a large region of normal tissue, with greater inhomogeneity over the treatment volume, which could benefit more with intensity‐modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). This is a case report of IMRT planning for a patient with endometrial cancer. The planning target volume (PTV) spanned the intrapelvic and periaortic lymph nodes to a 33‐cm length. Planning and treatment were accomplished using double isocenters. The IMRT plan was compared with a 3D plan, and the effects of field parameters were studied. Delineated anatomical contours included the intrapelvic nodes (PTV), bone marrow, small bowel, bladder, rectum, sigmoid colon, periaortic nodes (PTV), spinal cord, left kidney, right kidney, large bowel, liver, and tissue (excluding the PTVs). Comparisons were made between IMRT and 3D plans, 23‐MV and 6‐MV energies, zero and rotated collimator angles, different numbers of segments, and opposite gantry angle configurations. The plans were evaluated based on dose‐volume histograms (DVHs). Compared with the 3D plan, the IMRT plan had superior dose conformity and spared the bladder and sigmoid colon embedded in the intrapelvic nodes. The higher energy (23 MV) reduced the dose to most critical organs and delivered less integral dose. Zero collimator angles resulted in a better plan than “optimized” collimator angles, with lower dose to most of the normal structures. The number of segments did not have much effect on isodose distribution, but a reasonable number of segments was necessary to keep treatment time from being prohibitively long. Gantry angles, when evenly spaced, had no noticeable effect on the plan. The patient tolerated the treatment well, and the initial complete blood count was favorable. Our results indicated that large‐volume tumor sites may also benefit from precise conformal delivery of IMRT. PACS numbers: 87.53.Kn, 87.53.Tf |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5723493 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2005 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57234932018-04-02 Effects of field parameters on IMRT plan quality for gynecological cancer: A case study Fung, Albert Y.C. Enke, Charles A. Ayyangar, Komanduri M. Thompson, Robert B. Zhen, Weining Raman, Natarajan V. Djajaputra, David Li, Sicong Nehru, Ramasamy M. Pillai, Sushakumari Sourivong, Paul Headley, Mary Yager, Ann L. J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics Traditional external beam radiotherapy of gynecological cancer consists of a 3D, four‐field‐box technique. The radiation treatment area is a large region of normal tissue, with greater inhomogeneity over the treatment volume, which could benefit more with intensity‐modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). This is a case report of IMRT planning for a patient with endometrial cancer. The planning target volume (PTV) spanned the intrapelvic and periaortic lymph nodes to a 33‐cm length. Planning and treatment were accomplished using double isocenters. The IMRT plan was compared with a 3D plan, and the effects of field parameters were studied. Delineated anatomical contours included the intrapelvic nodes (PTV), bone marrow, small bowel, bladder, rectum, sigmoid colon, periaortic nodes (PTV), spinal cord, left kidney, right kidney, large bowel, liver, and tissue (excluding the PTVs). Comparisons were made between IMRT and 3D plans, 23‐MV and 6‐MV energies, zero and rotated collimator angles, different numbers of segments, and opposite gantry angle configurations. The plans were evaluated based on dose‐volume histograms (DVHs). Compared with the 3D plan, the IMRT plan had superior dose conformity and spared the bladder and sigmoid colon embedded in the intrapelvic nodes. The higher energy (23 MV) reduced the dose to most critical organs and delivered less integral dose. Zero collimator angles resulted in a better plan than “optimized” collimator angles, with lower dose to most of the normal structures. The number of segments did not have much effect on isodose distribution, but a reasonable number of segments was necessary to keep treatment time from being prohibitively long. Gantry angles, when evenly spaced, had no noticeable effect on the plan. The patient tolerated the treatment well, and the initial complete blood count was favorable. Our results indicated that large‐volume tumor sites may also benefit from precise conformal delivery of IMRT. PACS numbers: 87.53.Kn, 87.53.Tf John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2005-08-17 /pmc/articles/PMC5723493/ /pubmed/16143791 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v6i3.2087 Text en © 2005 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Radiation Oncology Physics Fung, Albert Y.C. Enke, Charles A. Ayyangar, Komanduri M. Thompson, Robert B. Zhen, Weining Raman, Natarajan V. Djajaputra, David Li, Sicong Nehru, Ramasamy M. Pillai, Sushakumari Sourivong, Paul Headley, Mary Yager, Ann L. Effects of field parameters on IMRT plan quality for gynecological cancer: A case study |
title | Effects of field parameters on IMRT plan quality for gynecological cancer: A case study |
title_full | Effects of field parameters on IMRT plan quality for gynecological cancer: A case study |
title_fullStr | Effects of field parameters on IMRT plan quality for gynecological cancer: A case study |
title_full_unstemmed | Effects of field parameters on IMRT plan quality for gynecological cancer: A case study |
title_short | Effects of field parameters on IMRT plan quality for gynecological cancer: A case study |
title_sort | effects of field parameters on imrt plan quality for gynecological cancer: a case study |
topic | Radiation Oncology Physics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5723493/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16143791 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v6i3.2087 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fungalbertyc effectsoffieldparametersonimrtplanqualityforgynecologicalcanceracasestudy AT enkecharlesa effectsoffieldparametersonimrtplanqualityforgynecologicalcanceracasestudy AT ayyangarkomandurim effectsoffieldparametersonimrtplanqualityforgynecologicalcanceracasestudy AT thompsonrobertb effectsoffieldparametersonimrtplanqualityforgynecologicalcanceracasestudy AT zhenweining effectsoffieldparametersonimrtplanqualityforgynecologicalcanceracasestudy AT ramannatarajanv effectsoffieldparametersonimrtplanqualityforgynecologicalcanceracasestudy AT djajaputradavid effectsoffieldparametersonimrtplanqualityforgynecologicalcanceracasestudy AT lisicong effectsoffieldparametersonimrtplanqualityforgynecologicalcanceracasestudy AT nehruramasamym effectsoffieldparametersonimrtplanqualityforgynecologicalcanceracasestudy AT pillaisushakumari effectsoffieldparametersonimrtplanqualityforgynecologicalcanceracasestudy AT sourivongpaul effectsoffieldparametersonimrtplanqualityforgynecologicalcanceracasestudy AT headleymary effectsoffieldparametersonimrtplanqualityforgynecologicalcanceracasestudy AT yagerannl effectsoffieldparametersonimrtplanqualityforgynecologicalcanceracasestudy |