Cargando…

Treatment‐planning considerations for prostate implants with the new linear RadioCoil™ [Formula: see text] brachytherapy source

Recently, various linear source models, for example, [Formula: see text] RadioCoil™, have been introduced to overcome the shortcomings of traditional “seed” type interstitial prostate brachytherapy implants, such as migration and clumping of the seeds. However, the existing prostate treatment‐planni...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Meigooni, Ali S., Awan, Shahid B., Rachabatthula, Venkata, Koona, Rafiq A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2005
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5723496/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16143789
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v6i3.2097
_version_ 1783285225265037312
author Meigooni, Ali S.
Awan, Shahid B.
Rachabatthula, Venkata
Koona, Rafiq A.
author_facet Meigooni, Ali S.
Awan, Shahid B.
Rachabatthula, Venkata
Koona, Rafiq A.
author_sort Meigooni, Ali S.
collection PubMed
description Recently, various linear source models, for example, [Formula: see text] RadioCoil™, have been introduced to overcome the shortcomings of traditional “seed” type interstitial prostate brachytherapy implants, such as migration and clumping of the seeds. However, the existing prostate treatment‐planning systems have not been updated to perform dose calculation for implants with linear sources greater than 1.0 cm in length. In these investigations, two new models are developed for 3D dose calculation for a prostate implant with linear brachytherapy sources using the commercially available treatment‐planning systems. The proposed models are referred to as the linear‐segmented source (LSS) model and the point‐segmented source (PSS) model. The calculated dose distributions obtained by these models for a single linear source have been validated by their comparison with the Monte Carlo–simulated data. Moreover, these models were used to calculate the dose distributions for a multilinear source prostate implant, and the results were compared to “seed” type implants. The results of these investigations show that the LSS model better approximates the linear sources than the PSS model. Moreover, these models have shown a better approximation of the dose distribution from a linear source for 0.5 cm source segments as compared to 1.0 cm source segments. However, for the points close to the longitudinal axis of the source located outside the region bounded by the active length, both models show differences of approximately [Formula: see text]. These deficiencies are attributed to the limitations of the TG43 formalism for elongated sources. PACS number: 87.53.‐j
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5723496
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2005
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57234962018-04-02 Treatment‐planning considerations for prostate implants with the new linear RadioCoil™ [Formula: see text] brachytherapy source Meigooni, Ali S. Awan, Shahid B. Rachabatthula, Venkata Koona, Rafiq A. J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics Recently, various linear source models, for example, [Formula: see text] RadioCoil™, have been introduced to overcome the shortcomings of traditional “seed” type interstitial prostate brachytherapy implants, such as migration and clumping of the seeds. However, the existing prostate treatment‐planning systems have not been updated to perform dose calculation for implants with linear sources greater than 1.0 cm in length. In these investigations, two new models are developed for 3D dose calculation for a prostate implant with linear brachytherapy sources using the commercially available treatment‐planning systems. The proposed models are referred to as the linear‐segmented source (LSS) model and the point‐segmented source (PSS) model. The calculated dose distributions obtained by these models for a single linear source have been validated by their comparison with the Monte Carlo–simulated data. Moreover, these models were used to calculate the dose distributions for a multilinear source prostate implant, and the results were compared to “seed” type implants. The results of these investigations show that the LSS model better approximates the linear sources than the PSS model. Moreover, these models have shown a better approximation of the dose distribution from a linear source for 0.5 cm source segments as compared to 1.0 cm source segments. However, for the points close to the longitudinal axis of the source located outside the region bounded by the active length, both models show differences of approximately [Formula: see text]. These deficiencies are attributed to the limitations of the TG43 formalism for elongated sources. PACS number: 87.53.‐j John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2005-08-17 /pmc/articles/PMC5723496/ /pubmed/16143789 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v6i3.2097 Text en © 2005 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Meigooni, Ali S.
Awan, Shahid B.
Rachabatthula, Venkata
Koona, Rafiq A.
Treatment‐planning considerations for prostate implants with the new linear RadioCoil™ [Formula: see text] brachytherapy source
title Treatment‐planning considerations for prostate implants with the new linear RadioCoil™ [Formula: see text] brachytherapy source
title_full Treatment‐planning considerations for prostate implants with the new linear RadioCoil™ [Formula: see text] brachytherapy source
title_fullStr Treatment‐planning considerations for prostate implants with the new linear RadioCoil™ [Formula: see text] brachytherapy source
title_full_unstemmed Treatment‐planning considerations for prostate implants with the new linear RadioCoil™ [Formula: see text] brachytherapy source
title_short Treatment‐planning considerations for prostate implants with the new linear RadioCoil™ [Formula: see text] brachytherapy source
title_sort treatment‐planning considerations for prostate implants with the new linear radiocoil™ [formula: see text] brachytherapy source
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5723496/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16143789
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v6i3.2097
work_keys_str_mv AT meigoonialis treatmentplanningconsiderationsforprostateimplantswiththenewlinearradiocoilformulaseetextbrachytherapysource
AT awanshahidb treatmentplanningconsiderationsforprostateimplantswiththenewlinearradiocoilformulaseetextbrachytherapysource
AT rachabatthulavenkata treatmentplanningconsiderationsforprostateimplantswiththenewlinearradiocoilformulaseetextbrachytherapysource
AT koonarafiqa treatmentplanningconsiderationsforprostateimplantswiththenewlinearradiocoilformulaseetextbrachytherapysource