Cargando…

Evaluation of dose delivery accuracy of Gamma Knife by polymer gel dosimetry

The BANG™ polymer gel dosimeter was used to evaluate 3D absorbed dose distributions in tissue delivered with Gamma Knife stereotactic radiosurgery systems. We compared dose distributions calculated with Leksell GammaPlan (LGP) treatment‐planning software with dose distributions measured with the pol...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Watanabe, Yoichi, Akimitsu, Tomohide, Hirokawa, Yutaka, Mooij, Rob B., Perera, G. Mark
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2005
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5723498/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16143798
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v6i3.2110
_version_ 1783285225746333696
author Watanabe, Yoichi
Akimitsu, Tomohide
Hirokawa, Yutaka
Mooij, Rob B.
Perera, G. Mark
author_facet Watanabe, Yoichi
Akimitsu, Tomohide
Hirokawa, Yutaka
Mooij, Rob B.
Perera, G. Mark
author_sort Watanabe, Yoichi
collection PubMed
description The BANG™ polymer gel dosimeter was used to evaluate 3D absorbed dose distributions in tissue delivered with Gamma Knife stereotactic radiosurgery systems. We compared dose distributions calculated with Leksell GammaPlan (LGP) treatment‐planning software with dose distributions measured with the polymer gel dosimeter for single‐shot irradiations. Head‐sized spherical glass vessels filled with the polymer gel were irradiated with Gamma Knife. The phantoms were scanned with a 1.0T MRI scanner. The Hahn spin‐echo sequence with two echoes was used for the MRI scans. Calibration relations between the spin‐spin relaxation rate and the absorbed dose were obtained by using small cylindrical vials, which were filled with the polymer gel from the same batch as for the spherical phantom. We made voxel‐by‐voxel comparisons of measured and calculated dose distributions for [Formula: see text] dose matrix elements. With the 3D dose data we calculated the tumor control probability (TCP) and normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) for a simple model. For the maximum dose of 100 Gy, the mean and one standard deviation of differences between the measured and the calculated doses were the following: [Formula: see text] Gy, and [Formula: see text] for 8‐mm, 14‐mm, and 18‐mm collimators, respectively. Tumor control probability values for measurements were smaller than the calculations by 0% to 7%, whereas NTCP values were larger by 7% to 24% for four of six experiments. PACS numbers: 87.53.‐j, 87.53.Dq, 87.53.Ly
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5723498
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2005
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57234982018-04-02 Evaluation of dose delivery accuracy of Gamma Knife by polymer gel dosimetry Watanabe, Yoichi Akimitsu, Tomohide Hirokawa, Yutaka Mooij, Rob B. Perera, G. Mark J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Measurements The BANG™ polymer gel dosimeter was used to evaluate 3D absorbed dose distributions in tissue delivered with Gamma Knife stereotactic radiosurgery systems. We compared dose distributions calculated with Leksell GammaPlan (LGP) treatment‐planning software with dose distributions measured with the polymer gel dosimeter for single‐shot irradiations. Head‐sized spherical glass vessels filled with the polymer gel were irradiated with Gamma Knife. The phantoms were scanned with a 1.0T MRI scanner. The Hahn spin‐echo sequence with two echoes was used for the MRI scans. Calibration relations between the spin‐spin relaxation rate and the absorbed dose were obtained by using small cylindrical vials, which were filled with the polymer gel from the same batch as for the spherical phantom. We made voxel‐by‐voxel comparisons of measured and calculated dose distributions for [Formula: see text] dose matrix elements. With the 3D dose data we calculated the tumor control probability (TCP) and normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) for a simple model. For the maximum dose of 100 Gy, the mean and one standard deviation of differences between the measured and the calculated doses were the following: [Formula: see text] Gy, and [Formula: see text] for 8‐mm, 14‐mm, and 18‐mm collimators, respectively. Tumor control probability values for measurements were smaller than the calculations by 0% to 7%, whereas NTCP values were larger by 7% to 24% for four of six experiments. PACS numbers: 87.53.‐j, 87.53.Dq, 87.53.Ly John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2005-08-17 /pmc/articles/PMC5723498/ /pubmed/16143798 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v6i3.2110 Text en © 2005 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Measurements
Watanabe, Yoichi
Akimitsu, Tomohide
Hirokawa, Yutaka
Mooij, Rob B.
Perera, G. Mark
Evaluation of dose delivery accuracy of Gamma Knife by polymer gel dosimetry
title Evaluation of dose delivery accuracy of Gamma Knife by polymer gel dosimetry
title_full Evaluation of dose delivery accuracy of Gamma Knife by polymer gel dosimetry
title_fullStr Evaluation of dose delivery accuracy of Gamma Knife by polymer gel dosimetry
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of dose delivery accuracy of Gamma Knife by polymer gel dosimetry
title_short Evaluation of dose delivery accuracy of Gamma Knife by polymer gel dosimetry
title_sort evaluation of dose delivery accuracy of gamma knife by polymer gel dosimetry
topic Radiation Measurements
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5723498/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16143798
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v6i3.2110
work_keys_str_mv AT watanabeyoichi evaluationofdosedeliveryaccuracyofgammaknifebypolymergeldosimetry
AT akimitsutomohide evaluationofdosedeliveryaccuracyofgammaknifebypolymergeldosimetry
AT hirokawayutaka evaluationofdosedeliveryaccuracyofgammaknifebypolymergeldosimetry
AT mooijrobb evaluationofdosedeliveryaccuracyofgammaknifebypolymergeldosimetry
AT pereragmark evaluationofdosedeliveryaccuracyofgammaknifebypolymergeldosimetry