Cargando…
Effects of immobilization mask material on surface dose
This work investigates the increase in surface dose caused by thermoplastic masks used for patient positioning and immobilization. A thermoplastic mask is custom fit by stretching a heated mask over the patient at the time of treatment simulation. This mask is then used at treatment to increase the...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2005
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5723508/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15770192 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v6i1.1957 |
_version_ | 1783285228103532544 |
---|---|
author | Hadley, Scott W. Kelly, Robin Lam, Kwok |
author_facet | Hadley, Scott W. Kelly, Robin Lam, Kwok |
author_sort | Hadley, Scott W. |
collection | PubMed |
description | This work investigates the increase in surface dose caused by thermoplastic masks used for patient positioning and immobilization. A thermoplastic mask is custom fit by stretching a heated mask over the patient at the time of treatment simulation. This mask is then used at treatment to increase the reproducibility of the patient position. The skin sparing effect of mega‐voltage X‐ray beams can be reduced when the patient's skin surface is under the mask material. The sheet of thermoplastic mask has holes to reduce this effect and is available from one manufacturer with two different sizes of holes, one larger than the other. This work investigates the increase in surface dose caused by the mask material and quantifies the difference between the two samples of masks available. The change in the dose buildup was measured using an Attix parallel plate chamber by measuring tissue maximum ratios (TMRs) using solid water. Measurements were made with and without the mask material on the surface of the solid water for 6‐MV and 15‐MV X‐ray beams. The effective thickness of equivalent water was estimated from the TMR curves, and the increase in surface dose was estimated. The buildup effect was measured to be equivalent to 2.2 mm to 0.6 mm for masks that have been stretched by different amounts. The surface dose was estimated to change from 16% and 12% for 6 MV and 15 MV, respectively, to 27% to 61% for 6 MV and 18% to 40% for 15 MV with the mask samples. PACS number: 87.53.Dq |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5723508 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2005 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57235082018-04-02 Effects of immobilization mask material on surface dose Hadley, Scott W. Kelly, Robin Lam, Kwok J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics This work investigates the increase in surface dose caused by thermoplastic masks used for patient positioning and immobilization. A thermoplastic mask is custom fit by stretching a heated mask over the patient at the time of treatment simulation. This mask is then used at treatment to increase the reproducibility of the patient position. The skin sparing effect of mega‐voltage X‐ray beams can be reduced when the patient's skin surface is under the mask material. The sheet of thermoplastic mask has holes to reduce this effect and is available from one manufacturer with two different sizes of holes, one larger than the other. This work investigates the increase in surface dose caused by the mask material and quantifies the difference between the two samples of masks available. The change in the dose buildup was measured using an Attix parallel plate chamber by measuring tissue maximum ratios (TMRs) using solid water. Measurements were made with and without the mask material on the surface of the solid water for 6‐MV and 15‐MV X‐ray beams. The effective thickness of equivalent water was estimated from the TMR curves, and the increase in surface dose was estimated. The buildup effect was measured to be equivalent to 2.2 mm to 0.6 mm for masks that have been stretched by different amounts. The surface dose was estimated to change from 16% and 12% for 6 MV and 15 MV, respectively, to 27% to 61% for 6 MV and 18% to 40% for 15 MV with the mask samples. PACS number: 87.53.Dq John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2005-03-17 /pmc/articles/PMC5723508/ /pubmed/15770192 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v6i1.1957 Text en © 2005 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Radiation Oncology Physics Hadley, Scott W. Kelly, Robin Lam, Kwok Effects of immobilization mask material on surface dose |
title | Effects of immobilization mask material on surface dose |
title_full | Effects of immobilization mask material on surface dose |
title_fullStr | Effects of immobilization mask material on surface dose |
title_full_unstemmed | Effects of immobilization mask material on surface dose |
title_short | Effects of immobilization mask material on surface dose |
title_sort | effects of immobilization mask material on surface dose |
topic | Radiation Oncology Physics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5723508/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15770192 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v6i1.1957 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hadleyscottw effectsofimmobilizationmaskmaterialonsurfacedose AT kellyrobin effectsofimmobilizationmaskmaterialonsurfacedose AT lamkwok effectsofimmobilizationmaskmaterialonsurfacedose |