Cargando…

Effects of immobilization mask material on surface dose

This work investigates the increase in surface dose caused by thermoplastic masks used for patient positioning and immobilization. A thermoplastic mask is custom fit by stretching a heated mask over the patient at the time of treatment simulation. This mask is then used at treatment to increase the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hadley, Scott W., Kelly, Robin, Lam, Kwok
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2005
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5723508/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15770192
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v6i1.1957
_version_ 1783285228103532544
author Hadley, Scott W.
Kelly, Robin
Lam, Kwok
author_facet Hadley, Scott W.
Kelly, Robin
Lam, Kwok
author_sort Hadley, Scott W.
collection PubMed
description This work investigates the increase in surface dose caused by thermoplastic masks used for patient positioning and immobilization. A thermoplastic mask is custom fit by stretching a heated mask over the patient at the time of treatment simulation. This mask is then used at treatment to increase the reproducibility of the patient position. The skin sparing effect of mega‐voltage X‐ray beams can be reduced when the patient's skin surface is under the mask material. The sheet of thermoplastic mask has holes to reduce this effect and is available from one manufacturer with two different sizes of holes, one larger than the other. This work investigates the increase in surface dose caused by the mask material and quantifies the difference between the two samples of masks available. The change in the dose buildup was measured using an Attix parallel plate chamber by measuring tissue maximum ratios (TMRs) using solid water. Measurements were made with and without the mask material on the surface of the solid water for 6‐MV and 15‐MV X‐ray beams. The effective thickness of equivalent water was estimated from the TMR curves, and the increase in surface dose was estimated. The buildup effect was measured to be equivalent to 2.2 mm to 0.6 mm for masks that have been stretched by different amounts. The surface dose was estimated to change from 16% and 12% for 6 MV and 15 MV, respectively, to 27% to 61% for 6 MV and 18% to 40% for 15 MV with the mask samples. PACS number: 87.53.Dq
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5723508
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2005
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57235082018-04-02 Effects of immobilization mask material on surface dose Hadley, Scott W. Kelly, Robin Lam, Kwok J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics This work investigates the increase in surface dose caused by thermoplastic masks used for patient positioning and immobilization. A thermoplastic mask is custom fit by stretching a heated mask over the patient at the time of treatment simulation. This mask is then used at treatment to increase the reproducibility of the patient position. The skin sparing effect of mega‐voltage X‐ray beams can be reduced when the patient's skin surface is under the mask material. The sheet of thermoplastic mask has holes to reduce this effect and is available from one manufacturer with two different sizes of holes, one larger than the other. This work investigates the increase in surface dose caused by the mask material and quantifies the difference between the two samples of masks available. The change in the dose buildup was measured using an Attix parallel plate chamber by measuring tissue maximum ratios (TMRs) using solid water. Measurements were made with and without the mask material on the surface of the solid water for 6‐MV and 15‐MV X‐ray beams. The effective thickness of equivalent water was estimated from the TMR curves, and the increase in surface dose was estimated. The buildup effect was measured to be equivalent to 2.2 mm to 0.6 mm for masks that have been stretched by different amounts. The surface dose was estimated to change from 16% and 12% for 6 MV and 15 MV, respectively, to 27% to 61% for 6 MV and 18% to 40% for 15 MV with the mask samples. PACS number: 87.53.Dq John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2005-03-17 /pmc/articles/PMC5723508/ /pubmed/15770192 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v6i1.1957 Text en © 2005 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Hadley, Scott W.
Kelly, Robin
Lam, Kwok
Effects of immobilization mask material on surface dose
title Effects of immobilization mask material on surface dose
title_full Effects of immobilization mask material on surface dose
title_fullStr Effects of immobilization mask material on surface dose
title_full_unstemmed Effects of immobilization mask material on surface dose
title_short Effects of immobilization mask material on surface dose
title_sort effects of immobilization mask material on surface dose
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5723508/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15770192
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v6i1.1957
work_keys_str_mv AT hadleyscottw effectsofimmobilizationmaskmaterialonsurfacedose
AT kellyrobin effectsofimmobilizationmaskmaterialonsurfacedose
AT lamkwok effectsofimmobilizationmaskmaterialonsurfacedose