Cargando…

Analysis of patient repositioning accuracy in precision radiation therapy using automated image fusion

This work describes a rapid and objective method of determining repositioning error during the course of precision radiation therapy using off‐line CT imaging and automated mutual‐information image fusion. The technique eliminates the variability associated with manual identification of anatomical l...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Robar, James L., Clark, Brenda G., Schella, Jason W., Kim, Chang Seon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2005
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5723511/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15770198
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v6i1.1998
_version_ 1783285228839632896
author Robar, James L.
Clark, Brenda G.
Schella, Jason W.
Kim, Chang Seon
author_facet Robar, James L.
Clark, Brenda G.
Schella, Jason W.
Kim, Chang Seon
author_sort Robar, James L.
collection PubMed
description This work describes a rapid and objective method of determining repositioning error during the course of precision radiation therapy using off‐line CT imaging and automated mutual‐information image fusion. The technique eliminates the variability associated with manual identification of anatomical landmarks by observers. A phantom study was conducted to quantify the accuracy of the image co‐registration‐based analysis itself. For CT voxel dimensions of [Formula: see text] , the method is shown to detect translations with an accuracy of 0.5 mm in the anterior‐posterior and lateral dimensions and 0.8 mm in the superior‐inferior dimension. Phantom rotation in the coronal plane was detected to within 0.5° of expected values. The analysis has been applied to eight radiotherapy patients at two independent clinics, each immobilized by the same system for cranial stereotactic radiotherapy and CT‐imaged once per week over the five‐ to six‐week course of treatment. Among all patients, the ranges of translation in the anterior‐posterior, lateral, and superior‐inferior dimensions were [Formula: see text] , and [Formula: see text] , respectively. Considering all patients and CT scans, the standard deviations of translation were 0.42 mm, 0.47 mm, and 1.36 mm in the anterior‐posterior, lateral, and superior‐inferior dimensions, respectively. The ranges of patient rotation about the superior‐inferior, left‐right, and anterior‐posterior axes were [Formula: see text] , and [Formula: see text] , respectively. PACS numbers: 87.53.‐j, 87.53.Kn, 87.53.Ly, 87.53.Xd
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5723511
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2005
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57235112018-04-02 Analysis of patient repositioning accuracy in precision radiation therapy using automated image fusion Robar, James L. Clark, Brenda G. Schella, Jason W. Kim, Chang Seon J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics This work describes a rapid and objective method of determining repositioning error during the course of precision radiation therapy using off‐line CT imaging and automated mutual‐information image fusion. The technique eliminates the variability associated with manual identification of anatomical landmarks by observers. A phantom study was conducted to quantify the accuracy of the image co‐registration‐based analysis itself. For CT voxel dimensions of [Formula: see text] , the method is shown to detect translations with an accuracy of 0.5 mm in the anterior‐posterior and lateral dimensions and 0.8 mm in the superior‐inferior dimension. Phantom rotation in the coronal plane was detected to within 0.5° of expected values. The analysis has been applied to eight radiotherapy patients at two independent clinics, each immobilized by the same system for cranial stereotactic radiotherapy and CT‐imaged once per week over the five‐ to six‐week course of treatment. Among all patients, the ranges of translation in the anterior‐posterior, lateral, and superior‐inferior dimensions were [Formula: see text] , and [Formula: see text] , respectively. Considering all patients and CT scans, the standard deviations of translation were 0.42 mm, 0.47 mm, and 1.36 mm in the anterior‐posterior, lateral, and superior‐inferior dimensions, respectively. The ranges of patient rotation about the superior‐inferior, left‐right, and anterior‐posterior axes were [Formula: see text] , and [Formula: see text] , respectively. PACS numbers: 87.53.‐j, 87.53.Kn, 87.53.Ly, 87.53.Xd John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2005-03-17 /pmc/articles/PMC5723511/ /pubmed/15770198 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v6i1.1998 Text en © 2005 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Robar, James L.
Clark, Brenda G.
Schella, Jason W.
Kim, Chang Seon
Analysis of patient repositioning accuracy in precision radiation therapy using automated image fusion
title Analysis of patient repositioning accuracy in precision radiation therapy using automated image fusion
title_full Analysis of patient repositioning accuracy in precision radiation therapy using automated image fusion
title_fullStr Analysis of patient repositioning accuracy in precision radiation therapy using automated image fusion
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of patient repositioning accuracy in precision radiation therapy using automated image fusion
title_short Analysis of patient repositioning accuracy in precision radiation therapy using automated image fusion
title_sort analysis of patient repositioning accuracy in precision radiation therapy using automated image fusion
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5723511/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15770198
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v6i1.1998
work_keys_str_mv AT robarjamesl analysisofpatientrepositioningaccuracyinprecisionradiationtherapyusingautomatedimagefusion
AT clarkbrendag analysisofpatientrepositioningaccuracyinprecisionradiationtherapyusingautomatedimagefusion
AT schellajasonw analysisofpatientrepositioningaccuracyinprecisionradiationtherapyusingautomatedimagefusion
AT kimchangseon analysisofpatientrepositioningaccuracyinprecisionradiationtherapyusingautomatedimagefusion