Cargando…

A dose‐volume‐based tool for evaluating and ranking IMRT treatment plans

External beam radiotherapy is commonly used for patients with cancer. While tumor shrinkage and palliation are frequently achieved, local control and cure remain elusive for many cancers. With regard to local control, the fundamental problem is that radiotherapy‐induced normal tissue injury limits t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Miften, Moyed M., Das, Shiva K., Su, Min, Marks, Lawrence B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2004
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5723521/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15738916
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v5i4.1981
_version_ 1783285231177957376
author Miften, Moyed M.
Das, Shiva K.
Su, Min
Marks, Lawrence B.
author_facet Miften, Moyed M.
Das, Shiva K.
Su, Min
Marks, Lawrence B.
author_sort Miften, Moyed M.
collection PubMed
description External beam radiotherapy is commonly used for patients with cancer. While tumor shrinkage and palliation are frequently achieved, local control and cure remain elusive for many cancers. With regard to local control, the fundamental problem is that radiotherapy‐induced normal tissue injury limits the dose that can be delivered to the tumor. While intensity‐modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) allows for the delivery of higher tumor doses and the sparing of proximal critical structures, multiple competing plans can be generated based on dosimetric and/or biological constraints that need to be considered/compared. In this work, an IMRT treatment plan evaluation and ranking tool, based on dosimetric criteria, is presented. The treatment plan with the highest uncomplicated target conformity index [Formula: see text] is ranked at the top. The [Formula: see text] is a dose‐volume‐based index that considers both a target conformity index (TCI) and a normal tissue‐sparing index (NTSI). [Formula: see text] is designed to assist in the process of judging the merit of a clinical treatment plan. To demonstrate the utility of this tool, several competing lung and prostate IMRT treatment plans are compared. Results show that the plan with the highest [Formula: see text] values accomplished the competing goals of tumor coverage and critical structures sparing best, among rival treatment plans for both treatment sites. The study demonstrates, first, that dose‐volume‐based indices, which summarize complex dose distributions through a single index, can be used to automatically select the optimal plan among competing plans, and second, that this dose‐volume‐based index may be appropriate for ranking IMRT dose distributions. PACS numbers: 87.53.‐j, 87.53.Tf
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5723521
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2004
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57235212018-04-02 A dose‐volume‐based tool for evaluating and ranking IMRT treatment plans Miften, Moyed M. Das, Shiva K. Su, Min Marks, Lawrence B. J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics External beam radiotherapy is commonly used for patients with cancer. While tumor shrinkage and palliation are frequently achieved, local control and cure remain elusive for many cancers. With regard to local control, the fundamental problem is that radiotherapy‐induced normal tissue injury limits the dose that can be delivered to the tumor. While intensity‐modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) allows for the delivery of higher tumor doses and the sparing of proximal critical structures, multiple competing plans can be generated based on dosimetric and/or biological constraints that need to be considered/compared. In this work, an IMRT treatment plan evaluation and ranking tool, based on dosimetric criteria, is presented. The treatment plan with the highest uncomplicated target conformity index [Formula: see text] is ranked at the top. The [Formula: see text] is a dose‐volume‐based index that considers both a target conformity index (TCI) and a normal tissue‐sparing index (NTSI). [Formula: see text] is designed to assist in the process of judging the merit of a clinical treatment plan. To demonstrate the utility of this tool, several competing lung and prostate IMRT treatment plans are compared. Results show that the plan with the highest [Formula: see text] values accomplished the competing goals of tumor coverage and critical structures sparing best, among rival treatment plans for both treatment sites. The study demonstrates, first, that dose‐volume‐based indices, which summarize complex dose distributions through a single index, can be used to automatically select the optimal plan among competing plans, and second, that this dose‐volume‐based index may be appropriate for ranking IMRT dose distributions. PACS numbers: 87.53.‐j, 87.53.Tf John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2004-11-24 /pmc/articles/PMC5723521/ /pubmed/15738916 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v5i4.1981 Text en © 2004 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Miften, Moyed M.
Das, Shiva K.
Su, Min
Marks, Lawrence B.
A dose‐volume‐based tool for evaluating and ranking IMRT treatment plans
title A dose‐volume‐based tool for evaluating and ranking IMRT treatment plans
title_full A dose‐volume‐based tool for evaluating and ranking IMRT treatment plans
title_fullStr A dose‐volume‐based tool for evaluating and ranking IMRT treatment plans
title_full_unstemmed A dose‐volume‐based tool for evaluating and ranking IMRT treatment plans
title_short A dose‐volume‐based tool for evaluating and ranking IMRT treatment plans
title_sort dose‐volume‐based tool for evaluating and ranking imrt treatment plans
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5723521/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15738916
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v5i4.1981
work_keys_str_mv AT miftenmoyedm adosevolumebasedtoolforevaluatingandrankingimrttreatmentplans
AT dasshivak adosevolumebasedtoolforevaluatingandrankingimrttreatmentplans
AT sumin adosevolumebasedtoolforevaluatingandrankingimrttreatmentplans
AT markslawrenceb adosevolumebasedtoolforevaluatingandrankingimrttreatmentplans
AT miftenmoyedm dosevolumebasedtoolforevaluatingandrankingimrttreatmentplans
AT dasshivak dosevolumebasedtoolforevaluatingandrankingimrttreatmentplans
AT sumin dosevolumebasedtoolforevaluatingandrankingimrttreatmentplans
AT markslawrenceb dosevolumebasedtoolforevaluatingandrankingimrttreatmentplans