Cargando…
A dose‐volume‐based tool for evaluating and ranking IMRT treatment plans
External beam radiotherapy is commonly used for patients with cancer. While tumor shrinkage and palliation are frequently achieved, local control and cure remain elusive for many cancers. With regard to local control, the fundamental problem is that radiotherapy‐induced normal tissue injury limits t...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2004
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5723521/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15738916 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v5i4.1981 |
_version_ | 1783285231177957376 |
---|---|
author | Miften, Moyed M. Das, Shiva K. Su, Min Marks, Lawrence B. |
author_facet | Miften, Moyed M. Das, Shiva K. Su, Min Marks, Lawrence B. |
author_sort | Miften, Moyed M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | External beam radiotherapy is commonly used for patients with cancer. While tumor shrinkage and palliation are frequently achieved, local control and cure remain elusive for many cancers. With regard to local control, the fundamental problem is that radiotherapy‐induced normal tissue injury limits the dose that can be delivered to the tumor. While intensity‐modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) allows for the delivery of higher tumor doses and the sparing of proximal critical structures, multiple competing plans can be generated based on dosimetric and/or biological constraints that need to be considered/compared. In this work, an IMRT treatment plan evaluation and ranking tool, based on dosimetric criteria, is presented. The treatment plan with the highest uncomplicated target conformity index [Formula: see text] is ranked at the top. The [Formula: see text] is a dose‐volume‐based index that considers both a target conformity index (TCI) and a normal tissue‐sparing index (NTSI). [Formula: see text] is designed to assist in the process of judging the merit of a clinical treatment plan. To demonstrate the utility of this tool, several competing lung and prostate IMRT treatment plans are compared. Results show that the plan with the highest [Formula: see text] values accomplished the competing goals of tumor coverage and critical structures sparing best, among rival treatment plans for both treatment sites. The study demonstrates, first, that dose‐volume‐based indices, which summarize complex dose distributions through a single index, can be used to automatically select the optimal plan among competing plans, and second, that this dose‐volume‐based index may be appropriate for ranking IMRT dose distributions. PACS numbers: 87.53.‐j, 87.53.Tf |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5723521 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2004 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57235212018-04-02 A dose‐volume‐based tool for evaluating and ranking IMRT treatment plans Miften, Moyed M. Das, Shiva K. Su, Min Marks, Lawrence B. J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics External beam radiotherapy is commonly used for patients with cancer. While tumor shrinkage and palliation are frequently achieved, local control and cure remain elusive for many cancers. With regard to local control, the fundamental problem is that radiotherapy‐induced normal tissue injury limits the dose that can be delivered to the tumor. While intensity‐modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) allows for the delivery of higher tumor doses and the sparing of proximal critical structures, multiple competing plans can be generated based on dosimetric and/or biological constraints that need to be considered/compared. In this work, an IMRT treatment plan evaluation and ranking tool, based on dosimetric criteria, is presented. The treatment plan with the highest uncomplicated target conformity index [Formula: see text] is ranked at the top. The [Formula: see text] is a dose‐volume‐based index that considers both a target conformity index (TCI) and a normal tissue‐sparing index (NTSI). [Formula: see text] is designed to assist in the process of judging the merit of a clinical treatment plan. To demonstrate the utility of this tool, several competing lung and prostate IMRT treatment plans are compared. Results show that the plan with the highest [Formula: see text] values accomplished the competing goals of tumor coverage and critical structures sparing best, among rival treatment plans for both treatment sites. The study demonstrates, first, that dose‐volume‐based indices, which summarize complex dose distributions through a single index, can be used to automatically select the optimal plan among competing plans, and second, that this dose‐volume‐based index may be appropriate for ranking IMRT dose distributions. PACS numbers: 87.53.‐j, 87.53.Tf John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2004-11-24 /pmc/articles/PMC5723521/ /pubmed/15738916 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v5i4.1981 Text en © 2004 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Radiation Oncology Physics Miften, Moyed M. Das, Shiva K. Su, Min Marks, Lawrence B. A dose‐volume‐based tool for evaluating and ranking IMRT treatment plans |
title | A dose‐volume‐based tool for evaluating and ranking IMRT treatment plans |
title_full | A dose‐volume‐based tool for evaluating and ranking IMRT treatment plans |
title_fullStr | A dose‐volume‐based tool for evaluating and ranking IMRT treatment plans |
title_full_unstemmed | A dose‐volume‐based tool for evaluating and ranking IMRT treatment plans |
title_short | A dose‐volume‐based tool for evaluating and ranking IMRT treatment plans |
title_sort | dose‐volume‐based tool for evaluating and ranking imrt treatment plans |
topic | Radiation Oncology Physics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5723521/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15738916 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v5i4.1981 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT miftenmoyedm adosevolumebasedtoolforevaluatingandrankingimrttreatmentplans AT dasshivak adosevolumebasedtoolforevaluatingandrankingimrttreatmentplans AT sumin adosevolumebasedtoolforevaluatingandrankingimrttreatmentplans AT markslawrenceb adosevolumebasedtoolforevaluatingandrankingimrttreatmentplans AT miftenmoyedm dosevolumebasedtoolforevaluatingandrankingimrttreatmentplans AT dasshivak dosevolumebasedtoolforevaluatingandrankingimrttreatmentplans AT sumin dosevolumebasedtoolforevaluatingandrankingimrttreatmentplans AT markslawrenceb dosevolumebasedtoolforevaluatingandrankingimrttreatmentplans |