Cargando…

Comparative potency of obeticholic acid and natural bile acids on FXR in hepatic and intestinal in vitro cell models

Obeticholic acid (OCA) is a semisynthetic farnesoid X receptor (FXR) agonist, an analogue of chenodeoxycholic acid (CDCA) which is indicated for the treatment of primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) in combination with ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA). OCA efficiently inhibits bile acid synthesis and promot...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Yuanyuan, LaCerte, Carl, Kansra, Sanjay, Jackson, Jonathan P., Brouwer, Kenneth R., Edwards, Jeffrey E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5723701/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29226620
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/prp2.368
_version_ 1783285261305643008
author Zhang, Yuanyuan
LaCerte, Carl
Kansra, Sanjay
Jackson, Jonathan P.
Brouwer, Kenneth R.
Edwards, Jeffrey E.
author_facet Zhang, Yuanyuan
LaCerte, Carl
Kansra, Sanjay
Jackson, Jonathan P.
Brouwer, Kenneth R.
Edwards, Jeffrey E.
author_sort Zhang, Yuanyuan
collection PubMed
description Obeticholic acid (OCA) is a semisynthetic farnesoid X receptor (FXR) agonist, an analogue of chenodeoxycholic acid (CDCA) which is indicated for the treatment of primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) in combination with ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA). OCA efficiently inhibits bile acid synthesis and promotes bile acid efflux via activating FXR‐mediated mechanisms in a physiologically relevant in vitro cell system, Sandwich‐cultured Transporter Certified ™ human primary hepatocytes (SCHH). The study herein evaluated the effects of UDCA alone or in combination with OCA in SCHH. UDCA (≤100 μmol/L) alone did not inhibit CYP7A1 mRNA, and thus, no reduction in the endogenous bile acid pool observed. UDCA ≤100 μmol/L concomitantly administered with 0.1 μmol/L OCA had no effect on bile acid synthesis beyond what was observed with OCA alone. Furthermore, this study evaluated human Caco‐2 cells (clone C2BBe1) as in vitro intestinal models. Glycine conjugate of OCA increased mRNA levels of FXR target genes in Caco‐2 cells, FGF‐19, SHP, OSTα/β, and IBABP, but not ASBT, in a concentration‐dependent manner, while glycine conjugate of UDCA had no effect on the expression of these genes. The results suggested that UDCA ≤100 μmol/L did not activate FXR in human primary hepatocytes or intestinal cell line Caco‐2. Thus, co‐administration of UDCA with OCA did not affect OCA‐dependent pharmacological effects.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5723701
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57237012017-12-13 Comparative potency of obeticholic acid and natural bile acids on FXR in hepatic and intestinal in vitro cell models Zhang, Yuanyuan LaCerte, Carl Kansra, Sanjay Jackson, Jonathan P. Brouwer, Kenneth R. Edwards, Jeffrey E. Pharmacol Res Perspect Original Articles Obeticholic acid (OCA) is a semisynthetic farnesoid X receptor (FXR) agonist, an analogue of chenodeoxycholic acid (CDCA) which is indicated for the treatment of primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) in combination with ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA). OCA efficiently inhibits bile acid synthesis and promotes bile acid efflux via activating FXR‐mediated mechanisms in a physiologically relevant in vitro cell system, Sandwich‐cultured Transporter Certified ™ human primary hepatocytes (SCHH). The study herein evaluated the effects of UDCA alone or in combination with OCA in SCHH. UDCA (≤100 μmol/L) alone did not inhibit CYP7A1 mRNA, and thus, no reduction in the endogenous bile acid pool observed. UDCA ≤100 μmol/L concomitantly administered with 0.1 μmol/L OCA had no effect on bile acid synthesis beyond what was observed with OCA alone. Furthermore, this study evaluated human Caco‐2 cells (clone C2BBe1) as in vitro intestinal models. Glycine conjugate of OCA increased mRNA levels of FXR target genes in Caco‐2 cells, FGF‐19, SHP, OSTα/β, and IBABP, but not ASBT, in a concentration‐dependent manner, while glycine conjugate of UDCA had no effect on the expression of these genes. The results suggested that UDCA ≤100 μmol/L did not activate FXR in human primary hepatocytes or intestinal cell line Caco‐2. Thus, co‐administration of UDCA with OCA did not affect OCA‐dependent pharmacological effects. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-11-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5723701/ /pubmed/29226620 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/prp2.368 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Pharmacology Research & Perspectives published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd, British Pharmacological Society and American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial‐NoDerivs (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Zhang, Yuanyuan
LaCerte, Carl
Kansra, Sanjay
Jackson, Jonathan P.
Brouwer, Kenneth R.
Edwards, Jeffrey E.
Comparative potency of obeticholic acid and natural bile acids on FXR in hepatic and intestinal in vitro cell models
title Comparative potency of obeticholic acid and natural bile acids on FXR in hepatic and intestinal in vitro cell models
title_full Comparative potency of obeticholic acid and natural bile acids on FXR in hepatic and intestinal in vitro cell models
title_fullStr Comparative potency of obeticholic acid and natural bile acids on FXR in hepatic and intestinal in vitro cell models
title_full_unstemmed Comparative potency of obeticholic acid and natural bile acids on FXR in hepatic and intestinal in vitro cell models
title_short Comparative potency of obeticholic acid and natural bile acids on FXR in hepatic and intestinal in vitro cell models
title_sort comparative potency of obeticholic acid and natural bile acids on fxr in hepatic and intestinal in vitro cell models
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5723701/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29226620
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/prp2.368
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangyuanyuan comparativepotencyofobeticholicacidandnaturalbileacidsonfxrinhepaticandintestinalinvitrocellmodels
AT lacertecarl comparativepotencyofobeticholicacidandnaturalbileacidsonfxrinhepaticandintestinalinvitrocellmodels
AT kansrasanjay comparativepotencyofobeticholicacidandnaturalbileacidsonfxrinhepaticandintestinalinvitrocellmodels
AT jacksonjonathanp comparativepotencyofobeticholicacidandnaturalbileacidsonfxrinhepaticandintestinalinvitrocellmodels
AT brouwerkennethr comparativepotencyofobeticholicacidandnaturalbileacidsonfxrinhepaticandintestinalinvitrocellmodels
AT edwardsjeffreye comparativepotencyofobeticholicacidandnaturalbileacidsonfxrinhepaticandintestinalinvitrocellmodels