Cargando…

Quality differences between private for-profit, private non-profit and public hospitals in Norway: a retrospective national register-based study of acute readmission rates following total hip and knee arthroplasties

OBJECTIVES: To compare the quality of care—using unplanned acute hospital readmissions as a quality measure—among patients treated at private for-profit hospitals (PFPs), private non-profit hospitals (PNPs) and public hospitals (PUBs) in Norway. DESIGN: A retrospective comparative study using the No...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Holom, Geir Hiller, Hagen, Terje P
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5724080/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28821517
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015771
_version_ 1783285292790185984
author Holom, Geir Hiller
Hagen, Terje P
author_facet Holom, Geir Hiller
Hagen, Terje P
author_sort Holom, Geir Hiller
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To compare the quality of care—using unplanned acute hospital readmissions as a quality measure—among patients treated at private for-profit hospitals (PFPs), private non-profit hospitals (PNPs) and public hospitals (PUBs) in Norway. DESIGN: A retrospective comparative study using the Norwegian Patient Register. Readmissions were evaluated by logistic regressions both using adjustment for various patient-level and other covariates, and a two-stage model using distance as an instrumental variable. SETTING: The Norwegian healthcare system. POPULATION: All publicly financed patients having primary total hip (37 897 patients) or primary total knee arthroplasty (25 802 patients) at one of the three hospital types from 2009 to 2014. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURE: 30-day unplanned acute hospital readmission rate. RESULTS: We found highest readmission rates among PUBs and lowest among PFPs, for both procedures. However, the patients were on average more than 2 years younger at PFPs. PFPs also treated the least severe patients, while PUBs treated the most severe. Using adjustment for various patient-level and other covariates, compared to PUBs, both PFPs and PNPs had lower odds of readmission following both procedures. However, using the instrumental variable method, the only significant difference found was a lower odds of readmission at PNPs among hip patients when compared with PUBs. No patients in our data set were readmitted to PFPs, those originally treated at PFPs were readmitted to either PNPs or PUBs, and PUBs received most of the readmitted patients across hospital types. CONCLUSIONS: Quality differences between hospital types were small; however, PNPs had significantly lower readmission rates compared with PUBs among patients having total hip arthroplasty. PUBs received the larger part of the readmitted patients across hospital types and thus play an essential role in the care of more complex patients and for readmissions, regardless of any quality differences.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5724080
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57240802017-12-19 Quality differences between private for-profit, private non-profit and public hospitals in Norway: a retrospective national register-based study of acute readmission rates following total hip and knee arthroplasties Holom, Geir Hiller Hagen, Terje P BMJ Open Health Services Research OBJECTIVES: To compare the quality of care—using unplanned acute hospital readmissions as a quality measure—among patients treated at private for-profit hospitals (PFPs), private non-profit hospitals (PNPs) and public hospitals (PUBs) in Norway. DESIGN: A retrospective comparative study using the Norwegian Patient Register. Readmissions were evaluated by logistic regressions both using adjustment for various patient-level and other covariates, and a two-stage model using distance as an instrumental variable. SETTING: The Norwegian healthcare system. POPULATION: All publicly financed patients having primary total hip (37 897 patients) or primary total knee arthroplasty (25 802 patients) at one of the three hospital types from 2009 to 2014. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURE: 30-day unplanned acute hospital readmission rate. RESULTS: We found highest readmission rates among PUBs and lowest among PFPs, for both procedures. However, the patients were on average more than 2 years younger at PFPs. PFPs also treated the least severe patients, while PUBs treated the most severe. Using adjustment for various patient-level and other covariates, compared to PUBs, both PFPs and PNPs had lower odds of readmission following both procedures. However, using the instrumental variable method, the only significant difference found was a lower odds of readmission at PNPs among hip patients when compared with PUBs. No patients in our data set were readmitted to PFPs, those originally treated at PFPs were readmitted to either PNPs or PUBs, and PUBs received most of the readmitted patients across hospital types. CONCLUSIONS: Quality differences between hospital types were small; however, PNPs had significantly lower readmission rates compared with PUBs among patients having total hip arthroplasty. PUBs received the larger part of the readmitted patients across hospital types and thus play an essential role in the care of more complex patients and for readmissions, regardless of any quality differences. BMJ Publishing Group 2017-08-18 /pmc/articles/PMC5724080/ /pubmed/28821517 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015771 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Health Services Research
Holom, Geir Hiller
Hagen, Terje P
Quality differences between private for-profit, private non-profit and public hospitals in Norway: a retrospective national register-based study of acute readmission rates following total hip and knee arthroplasties
title Quality differences between private for-profit, private non-profit and public hospitals in Norway: a retrospective national register-based study of acute readmission rates following total hip and knee arthroplasties
title_full Quality differences between private for-profit, private non-profit and public hospitals in Norway: a retrospective national register-based study of acute readmission rates following total hip and knee arthroplasties
title_fullStr Quality differences between private for-profit, private non-profit and public hospitals in Norway: a retrospective national register-based study of acute readmission rates following total hip and knee arthroplasties
title_full_unstemmed Quality differences between private for-profit, private non-profit and public hospitals in Norway: a retrospective national register-based study of acute readmission rates following total hip and knee arthroplasties
title_short Quality differences between private for-profit, private non-profit and public hospitals in Norway: a retrospective national register-based study of acute readmission rates following total hip and knee arthroplasties
title_sort quality differences between private for-profit, private non-profit and public hospitals in norway: a retrospective national register-based study of acute readmission rates following total hip and knee arthroplasties
topic Health Services Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5724080/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28821517
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015771
work_keys_str_mv AT holomgeirhiller qualitydifferencesbetweenprivateforprofitprivatenonprofitandpublichospitalsinnorwayaretrospectivenationalregisterbasedstudyofacutereadmissionratesfollowingtotalhipandkneearthroplasties
AT hagenterjep qualitydifferencesbetweenprivateforprofitprivatenonprofitandpublichospitalsinnorwayaretrospectivenationalregisterbasedstudyofacutereadmissionratesfollowingtotalhipandkneearthroplasties