Cargando…

The clinical academic workforce of the future: a cross-sectional study of factors influencing career decision-making among clinical PhD students at two research-intensive UK universities

OBJECTIVES: To examine clinical doctoral students’ demographic and training characteristics, career intentions, career preparedness and what influences them as they plan their future careers. DESIGN AND SETTING: Online cross-sectional census surveys at two research-intensive medical schools in Engla...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lopes, Joana, Ranieri, Veronica, Lambert, Trevor, Pugh, Chris, Barratt, Helen, Fulop, Naomi J, Rees, Geraint, Best, Denise
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5724086/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28851792
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016823
_version_ 1783285294244560896
author Lopes, Joana
Ranieri, Veronica
Lambert, Trevor
Pugh, Chris
Barratt, Helen
Fulop, Naomi J
Rees, Geraint
Best, Denise
author_facet Lopes, Joana
Ranieri, Veronica
Lambert, Trevor
Pugh, Chris
Barratt, Helen
Fulop, Naomi J
Rees, Geraint
Best, Denise
author_sort Lopes, Joana
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To examine clinical doctoral students’ demographic and training characteristics, career intentions, career preparedness and what influences them as they plan their future careers. DESIGN AND SETTING: Online cross-sectional census surveys at two research-intensive medical schools in England in 2015–2016. PARTICIPANTS: All medically qualified PhD students (N=523) enrolled at the University of Oxford and University College London were invited to participate. We report on data from 320 participants (54% male and 44% female), who were representative by gender of the invited population. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Career intentions. RESULTS: Respondents were mainly in specialty training, including close to training completion (25%, n=80), and 18% (n=57) had completed training. Half (50%, n=159) intended to pursue a clinical academic career (CAC) and 62% (n=198) were at least moderately likely to seek a clinical lectureship (CL). However, 51% (n=163) had little or no knowledge about CL posts. Those wanting a CAC tended to have the most predoctoral medical research experience (χ(2) (2, N=305)=22.19, p=0.0005). Key reasons cited for not pursuing a CAC were the small number of senior academic appointments available, the difficulty of obtaining research grants and work-life balance. CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest that urging predoctoral clinicians to gain varied research experience while ensuring availability of opportunities, and introducing more flexible recruitment criteria for CL appointments, would foster CACs. As CL posts are often only open to those still in training, the many postdoctoral clinicians who have completed training, or nearly done so, do not currently gain the opportunity the post offers to develop as independent researchers. Better opportunities should be accompanied by enhanced career support for clinical doctoral students (eg, to increase knowledge of CLs). Finally, ways to increase the number of senior clinical academic appointments should be explored since their lack seems to significantly influence career decisions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5724086
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57240862017-12-19 The clinical academic workforce of the future: a cross-sectional study of factors influencing career decision-making among clinical PhD students at two research-intensive UK universities Lopes, Joana Ranieri, Veronica Lambert, Trevor Pugh, Chris Barratt, Helen Fulop, Naomi J Rees, Geraint Best, Denise BMJ Open Medical Education and Training OBJECTIVES: To examine clinical doctoral students’ demographic and training characteristics, career intentions, career preparedness and what influences them as they plan their future careers. DESIGN AND SETTING: Online cross-sectional census surveys at two research-intensive medical schools in England in 2015–2016. PARTICIPANTS: All medically qualified PhD students (N=523) enrolled at the University of Oxford and University College London were invited to participate. We report on data from 320 participants (54% male and 44% female), who were representative by gender of the invited population. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Career intentions. RESULTS: Respondents were mainly in specialty training, including close to training completion (25%, n=80), and 18% (n=57) had completed training. Half (50%, n=159) intended to pursue a clinical academic career (CAC) and 62% (n=198) were at least moderately likely to seek a clinical lectureship (CL). However, 51% (n=163) had little or no knowledge about CL posts. Those wanting a CAC tended to have the most predoctoral medical research experience (χ(2) (2, N=305)=22.19, p=0.0005). Key reasons cited for not pursuing a CAC were the small number of senior academic appointments available, the difficulty of obtaining research grants and work-life balance. CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest that urging predoctoral clinicians to gain varied research experience while ensuring availability of opportunities, and introducing more flexible recruitment criteria for CL appointments, would foster CACs. As CL posts are often only open to those still in training, the many postdoctoral clinicians who have completed training, or nearly done so, do not currently gain the opportunity the post offers to develop as independent researchers. Better opportunities should be accompanied by enhanced career support for clinical doctoral students (eg, to increase knowledge of CLs). Finally, ways to increase the number of senior clinical academic appointments should be explored since their lack seems to significantly influence career decisions. BMJ Publishing Group 2017-08-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5724086/ /pubmed/28851792 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016823 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Medical Education and Training
Lopes, Joana
Ranieri, Veronica
Lambert, Trevor
Pugh, Chris
Barratt, Helen
Fulop, Naomi J
Rees, Geraint
Best, Denise
The clinical academic workforce of the future: a cross-sectional study of factors influencing career decision-making among clinical PhD students at two research-intensive UK universities
title The clinical academic workforce of the future: a cross-sectional study of factors influencing career decision-making among clinical PhD students at two research-intensive UK universities
title_full The clinical academic workforce of the future: a cross-sectional study of factors influencing career decision-making among clinical PhD students at two research-intensive UK universities
title_fullStr The clinical academic workforce of the future: a cross-sectional study of factors influencing career decision-making among clinical PhD students at two research-intensive UK universities
title_full_unstemmed The clinical academic workforce of the future: a cross-sectional study of factors influencing career decision-making among clinical PhD students at two research-intensive UK universities
title_short The clinical academic workforce of the future: a cross-sectional study of factors influencing career decision-making among clinical PhD students at two research-intensive UK universities
title_sort clinical academic workforce of the future: a cross-sectional study of factors influencing career decision-making among clinical phd students at two research-intensive uk universities
topic Medical Education and Training
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5724086/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28851792
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016823
work_keys_str_mv AT lopesjoana theclinicalacademicworkforceofthefutureacrosssectionalstudyoffactorsinfluencingcareerdecisionmakingamongclinicalphdstudentsattworesearchintensiveukuniversities
AT ranieriveronica theclinicalacademicworkforceofthefutureacrosssectionalstudyoffactorsinfluencingcareerdecisionmakingamongclinicalphdstudentsattworesearchintensiveukuniversities
AT lamberttrevor theclinicalacademicworkforceofthefutureacrosssectionalstudyoffactorsinfluencingcareerdecisionmakingamongclinicalphdstudentsattworesearchintensiveukuniversities
AT pughchris theclinicalacademicworkforceofthefutureacrosssectionalstudyoffactorsinfluencingcareerdecisionmakingamongclinicalphdstudentsattworesearchintensiveukuniversities
AT barratthelen theclinicalacademicworkforceofthefutureacrosssectionalstudyoffactorsinfluencingcareerdecisionmakingamongclinicalphdstudentsattworesearchintensiveukuniversities
AT fulopnaomij theclinicalacademicworkforceofthefutureacrosssectionalstudyoffactorsinfluencingcareerdecisionmakingamongclinicalphdstudentsattworesearchintensiveukuniversities
AT reesgeraint theclinicalacademicworkforceofthefutureacrosssectionalstudyoffactorsinfluencingcareerdecisionmakingamongclinicalphdstudentsattworesearchintensiveukuniversities
AT bestdenise theclinicalacademicworkforceofthefutureacrosssectionalstudyoffactorsinfluencingcareerdecisionmakingamongclinicalphdstudentsattworesearchintensiveukuniversities
AT lopesjoana clinicalacademicworkforceofthefutureacrosssectionalstudyoffactorsinfluencingcareerdecisionmakingamongclinicalphdstudentsattworesearchintensiveukuniversities
AT ranieriveronica clinicalacademicworkforceofthefutureacrosssectionalstudyoffactorsinfluencingcareerdecisionmakingamongclinicalphdstudentsattworesearchintensiveukuniversities
AT lamberttrevor clinicalacademicworkforceofthefutureacrosssectionalstudyoffactorsinfluencingcareerdecisionmakingamongclinicalphdstudentsattworesearchintensiveukuniversities
AT pughchris clinicalacademicworkforceofthefutureacrosssectionalstudyoffactorsinfluencingcareerdecisionmakingamongclinicalphdstudentsattworesearchintensiveukuniversities
AT barratthelen clinicalacademicworkforceofthefutureacrosssectionalstudyoffactorsinfluencingcareerdecisionmakingamongclinicalphdstudentsattworesearchintensiveukuniversities
AT fulopnaomij clinicalacademicworkforceofthefutureacrosssectionalstudyoffactorsinfluencingcareerdecisionmakingamongclinicalphdstudentsattworesearchintensiveukuniversities
AT reesgeraint clinicalacademicworkforceofthefutureacrosssectionalstudyoffactorsinfluencingcareerdecisionmakingamongclinicalphdstudentsattworesearchintensiveukuniversities
AT bestdenise clinicalacademicworkforceofthefutureacrosssectionalstudyoffactorsinfluencingcareerdecisionmakingamongclinicalphdstudentsattworesearchintensiveukuniversities